<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0/0 = BBC Story and lots of comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/00-bbc-story-and-lots-of-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/00-bbc-story-and-lots-of-comments/</link>
	<description>Accept no substitutes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: coturnix</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/00-bbc-story-and-lots-of-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-71400</link>
		<dc:creator>coturnix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibiblio.org/pjones/wordpress/?p=1732#comment-71400</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d probably like &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/cgi-bin/MT/mt-search.cgi?Template=combinedSearch&amp;search=nullity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these posts&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d probably like <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/cgi-bin/MT/mt-search.cgi?Template=combinedSearch&amp;search=nullity" rel="nofollow">these posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Huang Chen</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/00-bbc-story-and-lots-of-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-71286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Huang Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibiblio.org/pjones/wordpress/?p=1732#comment-71286</guid>
		<description>Division by zero is absurd, but triviality is quite useful.

http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/

There are 3 existential types, not just 2. 

1) That which exists. 

2) That which does not exist. 

3) That for which existence is indeterminate. 

Any trivial is of the third type because “The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate”. 

This last statement can be proved quite easily. It says that given any unique object, there is no way to determine if the object is really itself, or if it is in fact a trivial clone of itself. This is indeterminate. 

One can exploit this existential indeterminacy of the trivials to make all kinds of unusual models. 

http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/

But division by zero ? I dont think that this will ever work.

Huang</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Division by zero is absurd, but triviality is quite useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>There are 3 existential types, not just 2. </p>
<p>1) That which exists. </p>
<p>2) That which does not exist. </p>
<p>3) That for which existence is indeterminate. </p>
<p>Any trivial is of the third type because “The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate”. </p>
<p>This last statement can be proved quite easily. It says that given any unique object, there is no way to determine if the object is really itself, or if it is in fact a trivial clone of itself. This is indeterminate. </p>
<p>One can exploit this existential indeterminacy of the trivials to make all kinds of unusual models. </p>
<p><a href="http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>But division by zero ? I dont think that this will ever work.</p>
<p>Huang</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
