Some of this unconfirmed and sites still to be secured, but the week of February 4 – 9, 2008 will be a big one for speakers here at UNC-Chapel Hill and ibiblio.org.
Monday February 4 at 3 pm, Cliff Missen of eGranary and Widernet.org will be speaking about his efforts and successes in bringing the Internet in a Box to places that the wires and wireless don’t reach — particularly in Africa. INTRAHealth and iblblio are sponsoring Cliff’s visit.
UPDATE: Cliff Missen will be speaking in the Pleasants Family Room of UNC’s Wilson Library.
Wednesday February 6 at 3 pm in the auditorium of the Frank Porter Graham Student Union, www.sivacracy.net founder Siva Vaidhyanathan will deliver the 2008 Henderson Lecture“The Human Knowledge Project (Part 1): Four Conceptual Errors concerning Massive Digital Library Projects.” This is a program of the School of Information and Library Science.
Part 2 of Vaidhyanathan’s talk will be presented at the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute at Duke University on Feb. 22, 2008.
Friday February 8 at 3 pm, DJ Spooky will give a demo/discussion/panel about his coming world premiere of VIDEO SOUL: WATTSTAX To The Avant Garde
“Internet use seems to create an information hunger and it is information-savvy young people who are most likely to visit libraries,” [Leigh Estabrook, a professor emerita at the University of Illinois and co-author of a report on the survey results] said.
Internet users were more than twice as likely to patronize libraries as non-Internet users, according to the survey.
More than two-thirds of library visitors in all age groups said they used computers while at the library.
Sixty-five percent of them looked up information on the Internet while 62 percent used computers to check into the library’s resources.
The survey showed 62 percent of Generation Y respondents said they visited a public library in the past year, with a steady decline in usage according to age. Some 57 percent of adults aged 43 to 52 said they visited a library in 2007, followed by 46 percent of adults aged 53 to 61; 42 percent of adults aged 62 to 71; and just 32 percent of adults over 72.
Note: this is a telephone based survey and so would likely undercount cell using Gen Ys.
The truth’s out there – honestly
We all know the pitfalls of Wikipedia, so where can you find some real facts online?
by James Knight
It has become a reflex reaction in the digital age. If you have a question that needs an answer or a fact to check, simply head online and tap it into Google. More often than not you will be directed to Wikipedia, where the answer is laid out for you.
The only problem is, it may not be the right answer.
Though many of us have come to rely on the online encyclopedia, every entry in it is available for anyone to edit, so you can’t always trust what you find there.
Fortunately, there are numerous more accurate resources on the web.
The trick is knowing where to look for them.
As an alternative to Wikipedia, try www.refdesk.com. This portal offers links to all manner of free dictionaries and encyclopedias, such as Microsoft’s Encarta, which has 42,000 articles. Conscientious researchers also have the option to head to sites with a better academic pedigree. Drawing together a range of global public-domain academic resources (of varying quality), www.ibiblio.org is worth dredging if you have a wide field of inquiry – cultural development in China, say.
For definitive statistics on any country in the world, the CIA World Factbook (www.tinyurl.com/2b2kg9) takes some beating. It contains up-to-date figures on everything from population to climate, life expectancy to natural resources and territorial disputes.
“We always say to our papers, you challenge is no matter what, the paper must improve. It always drove me crazy … where in a downturn, news hold cuts were made and the paper got worse. … And I always thought restaurants don’t make food worse in a downturn. Car companies don’t make cars less safe in a downturn. … Why is it OK to make a newspaper worse in a recession? That’s your excuse for making your product worse? It makes no sense.”
The question to Ted and to NandO and, indeed, to Pruitt is: are you making your product worse?
A more local McClatchy property, the Chapel Hill News, took a page cut today as well. The Sunday paper will now barely cover the bottom of a birdcage and is much too thin for wrapping a fish. (sans inserts).
W00t! W00t! is the Merriam-Webster’s top new word of 2007. Like it or not what we have been shouting by way of typing while playing video games, chatting or posting on our friends’ walls is now part of standard American English.
Computing culture has become more and more mainstream and accepted. How did this happen? Here’s one personal tale.
In 1991, we had been working on distributed searching and got some email from a researcher in Switzerland. He had a hypertext project that a few folks in high-energy physics were using. He thought more people would want to use it. He especially wanted to know if we could work on a gateway between our Wide Area Information Servers and his servers. We worked with him a bit and he used our servers for some demos there in Europe.
Then the big news came. He was coming to the US to do a presentation at Hypertext 91 in San Antonio. Almost immediately, he wrote disappointed. His paper had been turned down for being too simple. He would be allowed to do a poster and a small demo. But he was coming any way and would drop by North Carolina for a visit.
I called a local, not NCSU, computer science department and spoke to the folks there who were working on hypertext. They had seen the paper and rejected it.
Tim’s ideas were too simple. Anyone could implement such a server in an afternoon. And any graduate student could write a browser in a week! It was obvious from his description that he didn’t much understand hypertext markup languages. There were other objections.
But to me simplicity was the point, its elegance. That others could and did work on the code was a big plus. There was a community of developers that you could talk to. Even as a user you could make suggestions — and better they would often implement those ideas if you couldn’t do it yourself.
Tim Berners-Lee’s World Wide Web was running on my desktop – okay more a workstation than a desktop – a new NeXT computer from Steve Jobs.
And I was learning something about computing that I hadn’t been taught directly at NCSU — as told in three recent book titles:
The Wealth of Networks, how social production and sharing made great products and created opportunities and even new markets (thanks Yochai Benkler for writing a book describing the process in 2005 – his book is free or you can buy it from Yale Press, you can make translations on a wiki that Benkler supports).
I watched and participated in the process of Democratizing Innovation (thanks to Eric Von Hippel for naming and describing that process in his book which you can download or buy from MIT Press)
Through a series of events, I became perhaps overly involved in copyright and legal issues. I was also learning the power of Free Culture (thanks to Larry Lessig for writing that book which is free for download or you can buy it from Penguin Books)
I started comparing the Laws of Computing:
Moore’s law – processor speed doubles
Metcalf’s law – potential network connections grows by squaring the number of connections
But David Reed’s law — utility of a network grows exponentially, particularly in social networks, by the number of connections used.
I hope you’ve noticed that most of my story, the books mentioned and Reed’s law have been dependent on the social not just the technical. Indeed one of the surprises of computer science is not that it has social impact – technology usually has some sort of social impact – but the impact that our social selves have on technology.
Our need to network, to have friends, to involve others in our work, our need to listen to and to be affected by our users – all of this is embedded in our work and in our creations.
No successful company sees Research and Development as a place that develops ideas separate from the rest of the company or from their customers – and then tosses those ideas, patents, and projects over the wall to others to use or to abandon.
Computer science is not done just by teams with roles, but by a constant flow of social interactions that never seems to end. Well, for successful projects at least.
Most software projects of size involve if not open source, then an SDK or API or other interface that allows social production and innovation that was not imagined by the original developers.
Every project has a user group, a mailing list, etc to encourage involvement.
Every project has impact as the social uses of that project grow.
And afterwards the experience helps us grow and changes us.
If not “w00t!” wouldn’t be word of the year. Dilbert and to some degree Foxtrot wouldn’t be funny to those outside the tech industry.
We who were kept in the basement and fed pizza and power drinks are creators of our common culture through our social contributions. Our software is global. Within the code is contained law and a social contract and to some degree our joint futures.
We are not just the people that our parents warned us about (Jimmy Buffet) as more and more we become “the ONES we have been waiting for” (June Jordan “Poem for South African Women”)
Advent was once a mini-Lent, a time to confess and cleanse your soul of sins. In a kind of reversal of that spirit, and in honor of our modern remaking of the season, I wrote a very brief but very compacted piece of seven lines for the News and Observer. In “Seven Deadly Friends,” our old friends the seven deadly sins don’t get a line each, they shift for position and have a few others visiting.
In print, this morning or online at the link above. Enjoy.
Perhaps the shortest and most compact poem that I’ve written — except for a couple of haiku assignments that aren’t worth mentioning even tho I just mentioned them — will be on the News and Observer Book Page this coming Sunday December 16th.
The Wolfsonian send a large packet about itself explaining among other things their concept of Thinkism: What man makes, makes man. This has inspired quite a bit of discussion on Thinkism here in the ibiblio brain-center. Does it mean I don’t have to clean up my office, for example?
The idea behind Thinkism is contained in Wolfson‘s phrase, “What man makes, makes man.” In other words, by examining the products, propaganda, and artwork that people have created over the years — and thinking about them — we can begin to understand objects as human ideas, concerns, and aspirations and start to understand why the world looks the way it does.
It’s more than just looking at a beautiful painting; it’s about considering an object, thinking about where and why it was made, and what role it plays in society. In this way, we make connections among everything in the world, and come to realize that everything is inter-connected. Everything. From old book covers to old stoves…