<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is Red; Yahoo is Blue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/google-is-red-yahoo-is-blue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/google-is-red-yahoo-is-blue/</link>
	<description>Accept no substitutes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Sinreich</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/google-is-red-yahoo-is-blue/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby Sinreich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=50#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I have had a Google News alert on the word &quot;abortion&quot; for several months.  Usually it turns up 5-8 conservative and far-right sources every day, NO liberal or prorogressive sources (Alternet and others are out there), and 1-2 regular news publications.  Their news sources include anti-choice websites (like Lifesite, People&#039;s Weekly World, LifeNews.com, and a bunch of catholic things), but they apparently don&#039;t follow any pro-choice sites.

I also have an alert on &quot;Planned Parenthood&quot; which turns up about 50% pro-life sources and 50% &quot;impartial&quot; journalistic sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a Google News alert on the word &#8220;abortion&#8221; for several months.  Usually it turns up 5-8 conservative and far-right sources every day, NO liberal or prorogressive sources (Alternet and others are out there), and 1-2 regular news publications.  Their news sources include anti-choice websites (like Lifesite, People&#8217;s Weekly World, LifeNews.com, and a bunch of catholic things), but they apparently don&#8217;t follow any pro-choice sites.</p>
<p>I also have an alert on &#8220;Planned Parenthood&#8221; which turns up about 50% pro-life sources and 50% &#8220;impartial&#8221; journalistic sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
