<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hood v Lawrence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/hood-v-lawrence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/hood-v-lawrence/</link>
	<description>Accept no substitutes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jones</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/hood-v-lawrence/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=54#comment-21</guid>
		<description>thanks for the correction. i have to admit, as i did, that the choice of &#039;insurgent&#039; over other words allows the imagination to conjure up ocean  
surges. imagine: what if you or bruce had used the cognate - freedom fighter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the correction. i have to admit, as i did, that the choice of &#8216;insurgent&#8217; over other words allows the imagination to conjure up ocean<br />
surges. imagine: what if you or bruce had used the cognate &#8211; freedom fighter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hood</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/hood-v-lawrence/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=54#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I just blogged about the same incident, but read the result entirely different. There is no definition, first or second or on down, that supports Professor Lawrence’s argument, which was preposterous. An insurgency is not a foreign infiltration, necessarily or in common usage. Remember that he was suggesting the president was “lying” because he attributed the violence in Iraq to “insurgents” instead of “dissidents.” Sounds like a semantic deal, but that is precisely what he was arguing -- the semantics suggested an intent to mislead. No, it just means that the good professor was, and probably is, confused.

Thanks for the invite, by the way. Great class, great experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just blogged about the same incident, but read the result entirely different. There is no definition, first or second or on down, that supports Professor Lawrence’s argument, which was preposterous. An insurgency is not a foreign infiltration, necessarily or in common usage. Remember that he was suggesting the president was “lying” because he attributed the violence in Iraq to “insurgents” instead of “dissidents.” Sounds like a semantic deal, but that is precisely what he was arguing &#8212; the semantics suggested an intent to mislead. No, it just means that the good professor was, and probably is, confused.</p>
<p>Thanks for the invite, by the way. Great class, great experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
