<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source problems with #noemail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/open-source-problems-with-noemail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/open-source-problems-with-noemail/</link>
	<description>Accept no substitutes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/open-source-problems-with-noemail/comment-page-1/#comment-440521</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/?p=3195#comment-440521</guid>
		<description>Status.net tells me: &quot;Subscription Confirmed: Congratulations, you&#039;ll be one of the first to experience StatusNet 1.0! In the coming weeks we&#039;ll be sending you an exclusive invitation to the Private Beta, and we&#039;ll be looking forward to your feedback.&quot;

It&#039;s open source, but not open for business. Or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Status.net tells me: &#8220;Subscription Confirmed: Congratulations, you&#8217;ll be one of the first to experience StatusNet 1.0! In the coming weeks we&#8217;ll be sending you an exclusive invitation to the Private Beta, and we&#8217;ll be looking forward to your feedback.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s open source, but not open for business. Or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: status.net lover</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/open-source-problems-with-noemail/comment-page-1/#comment-440520</link>
		<dc:creator>status.net lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/?p=3195#comment-440520</guid>
		<description>Yeah status.net is a great free and open source alternative to twitter, not to mention decentralised and federated. The thing is, Ruby, there is a standard specification (OStatus), developed largely by the geniuses at status.net, also in use by rstatus and possibly others, but twitter (being proprietary and centralized) seems to show little interest in adopting these standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah status.net is a great free and open source alternative to twitter, not to mention decentralised and federated. The thing is, Ruby, there is a standard specification (OStatus), developed largely by the geniuses at status.net, also in use by rstatus and possibly others, but twitter (being proprietary and centralized) seems to show little interest in adopting these standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Sinreich</title>
		<link>http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/open-source-problems-with-noemail/comment-page-1/#comment-440477</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby Sinreich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ibiblio.org/pjones/blog/?p=3195#comment-440477</guid>
		<description>http://status.net has got a decent open source alternative to Twitter. Though since there&#039;s no standardized protocol, they only partially talk to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://status.net" rel="nofollow">http://status.net</a> has got a decent open source alternative to Twitter. Though since there&#8217;s no standardized protocol, they only partially talk to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
