From glowbugs@theporch.com  Tue Jan  2 02:08:09 1996
Return-Path: glowbugs@theporch.com
Received: from uro (localhost.theporch.com [127.0.0.1]) by uro.theporch.com (8.7.3/AUX-3.1.1) with SMTP id CAA04833; Tue, 2 Jan 1996 02:04:22 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 1996 02:04:22 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199601020804.CAA04833@uro.theporch.com>
Errors-To: ws4s@midtenn.net
Reply-To: glowbugs@theporch.com
Originator: glowbugs@theporch.com
Sender: glowbugs@theporch.com
Precedence: bulk
From: glowbugs@theporch.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Subject: GLOWBUGS digest 64
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Please send list server requests to listproc@theporch.com
Status: O

			    GLOWBUGS Digest 64

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Help needed on homebrew TX
	by Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
  2) power supply for 6L6 Special
	by Bruce Robertson <brucerob@epas.utoronto.ca>
  3) Re: power supply for 6L6 Special
	by lbbarley@southwind.net (Bruce Barley)
  4) "Soft" Detector Tubes
	by "James P. Rybak" <jrybak@mesa5.Mesa.Colorado.EDU>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 11:04:05 -0600 (CST)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: glowbugs <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Subject: Help needed on homebrew TX
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960101104834.1279C-100000@admin.aurora.edu>


For the last week I havebeen building a CW transmitter for a friend.
It started out to be a rebuild of an old homebrew xtal controlled
rock crusher novice rig he picked up (single 6146) that was very
poorly constructed.

Anyway, I started over. The new rig has a solid state VFO (Hi-C Hartley
FET osc with several untuned followers & buffers behind it). The tube
part of the rig consists of a 6V6 driver and a pair of 2E26's as a push-
push doubler in the final. Basically, it seems to work as expected in that
power input is around 40 watts and output is 20 watts (This thing is
running close to class B because of drive capability). All unwanted
products (harmonics and osc feedthru) are at least -35dB.

Problem 1: Even though there are numerous buffers after the VFO osc stage,
tuning the grid tank of the final stage pulls the osc off freq. The VFO
is a self contained unit inside a minibox and is powered from a 7812
regulator. This pulling even happens when in the standby mode, where the
final grids are switched to a cutoff bias.

Problem 2: There is noticeable hum on the carrier, worse at the higher
bands (15 is worse than 40). I cannot detect the hum on a Marconi
modulation meter although I can see a slight ripple on the carrier on
a scope. I would guess the hum is less than 1% modulation, but I certainly
can hear it. How much hum is acceptable? I haven't tried an on-the-air
test with anyone yet. Plate supply ripple is 2V P-P and bias supply has
no detectable ripple. Appears to be clean thru the driver stage but
appears when the finals are engaged. 

Any ideas?

Thanks de Bob, K9EUI  (broehrig@admin.aurora.edu)


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 15:29:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Robertson <brucerob@epas.utoronto.ca>
To: Multiple recipients of list <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Subject: power supply for 6L6 Special
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960101152301.22911A-100000@epas.utoronto.ca>

After learning form some of you about the pit-falls of using a 
transformer as a choke, I'm now left without a big choke for my single 
tube 6L6 rock-bound project. I was thinking that choke input and its 
great regulation would be a good thing, but I'm now wondering about 
cap-input. My 53 Handbook wisely (though vaguely) sayas that good 
regulation is a good thing for a single stage rig, but it doesn't tell me 
what I need: 20%? Any rules of thumb out there? In my experinee a xtal 
alone doesn't drift much with voltage, but then that was down in the 12v 
range. Hmmm. I can get BIG caps, but I think I'll try for the 47 mmf 500 
v ones. At 400v with a good bleeder am I out of the ball-park?

Just trying to borrow someone's life's experience :-)

72, VE3UWL

Bruce G. Robertson  Dept. of Classics, U. of T.     


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 15:46:11 -0600
From: lbbarley@southwind.net (Bruce Barley)
To: brucerob@epas.utoronto.ca
Cc: glowbugs@theporch.com
Subject: Re: power supply for 6L6 Special
Message-ID: <199601012146.PAA12299@onyx.southwind.net>

>From one Bruce to another - Hi.

If you are using a vacuum tube rectifier (a la' 5U4 family), a large value
capacitor input filter will yield a very large peak current to the first
capacitor in the filter which can be enough to really shorten the life of
your rectifier.  For something of the 6L6 single tuber power range, I would
suggest nothing larger than 40 mfd for the input filter.  If you have access
to a RCA Teceiving Tube Manual (mine is RC-29, ca 1973), you will see the
voltage drop, versus B+ power delivered is a lot steeper using a capacitor
input rather than a choke input filter. And those design curves are
specified 40 mfd.  If by any chance you are using a half wave, rather than a
full wave rectifier circuit, the peak current to the input filter capacitor
is even greater!  A direct result of this is that the power transformer
itself must be derated in total power handling capacity due to this peak
current.  

My '61 ARRL handbook shows a 6DQ6 single tuber - rock bound which uses only
8 ufd in each filter section (but with a choke - as a PI filter).  Runs 370
VDC to the plate and REGULATED 150 VDC to the screen grid.  This is done
with an OD3/VR150 regulator tube.  

In some of the old televisions, it wasn't uncommon to find several hundred
mfd capacitors at 450 VDC in the filter circuits.  However, you typically
found a fairly stiff input resistor at the start of the whole shebang, and
remember that the load current on the supply was virtually STEADY.  In your
1 tuber you will have an on-off situation drawing several tens of watts out
of that filter.  To help in limiting the current surge in the first
capacitor, I would look at putting about 270 - 330 ohms (at 10 watts wire
wound) in series with the first capacitor. The penalty here is going to cost
you about 25 to 30 volts. If you stay at around 8 mfd for your input
capacitor, you can get by without this resistor.  You may find it
advantageous to put your large capacitor as the second capacitor (or even
3rd) in your p/s filter, and use a couple of hundred ohms at 5 watts wire
wound between the 1st and 2nd capacitor (and about 150 ohms at 5 watts w/w
between the 2nd and 3rd filter capacitor). At 90 ma total draw, you'll drop
about 20 volts across the resistor between the 1st and 2nd capacitor.
However, your a-c ripple will be down to typically close to 1% coming out of
these filters at rated load. And you want to keep better than 10% regulation
on your B+ line.  

I really like the idea of the screen regulator.  It will help keep a more
constant load on your power supply in a key up condition, and should help
reduce how "yoopy" your on-air signal sounds.  So too, will a good bleeder
of about 47K at 10 watts.  Combine the two, and you probably will have a
signal that won't draw too much attention from your O-O. {Do we still have
Official Observers? Yes/No}.

If you're into building, there are several circuits in the '61 ARRL handbook
for voltage regulators which are multi-tube circuits, not too complex, and
DON'T require those chokes which are so hard to come up with in the 10+ hy
and 100+ ma ranges.  You might take a look and see if any of those tickle
your fancy.  Once built, they would be useful for a multitude of projects.  

Best wishes for '96.  Hope to get to work you on 40 with that rig when you
get it up and running.  

Bruce Barley - KB0PZD
lbbarley@southwind.net

>After learning form some of you about the pit-falls of using a 
>transformer as a choke, I'm now left without a big choke for my single 
>tube 6L6 rock-bound project. I was thinking that choke input and its 
>great regulation would be a good thing, but I'm now wondering about 
>cap-input. My 53 Handbook wisely (though vaguely) sayas that good 
>regulation is a good thing for a single stage rig, but it doesn't tell me 
>what I need: 20%? Any rules of thumb out there? In my experinee a xtal 
>alone doesn't drift much with voltage, but then that was down in the 12v 
>range. Hmmm. I can get BIG caps, but I think I'll try for the 47 mmf 500 
>v ones. At 400v with a good bleeder am I out of the ball-park?
>
>Just trying to borrow someone's life's experience :-)
>
>72, VE3UWL
>
>Bruce G. Robertson  Dept. of Classics, U. of T.     



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 14:54:49 -0700 (MST)
From: "James P. Rybak" <jrybak@mesa5.Mesa.Colorado.EDU>
To: Glowbugs <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Subject: "Soft" Detector Tubes
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9601011402.A11198-0100000@mesa5.mesa.colorado.edu>

I know that the UV200 and UX200 were "soft" detector tubes.  (They did 
not have a "hard" vacuum.)  Can anyone tell me what other varieties of 
"soft" detector tubes were used in the early 1920's?  For instance, what 
about the UV199, UX199, WD11, etc.?

Thanks.

Jim Rybak  W0KSD

------------------------------

End of GLOWBUGS Digest 64
*************************

