From glowbugs@theporch.com  Mon Oct 14 11:02:03 1996
Return-Path: <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Received: from uro (localhost.theporch.com [127.0.0.1]) by uro.theporch.com (8.8.0/AUX-3.1.1) with SMTP id KAA10380; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 10:55:49 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 10:55:49 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199610141555.KAA10380@uro.theporch.com>
Errors-To: conard@tntech.campus.mci.net
Reply-To: glowbugs@theporch.com
Originator: glowbugs@theporch.com
Sender: glowbugs@theporch.com
Precedence: bulk
From: glowbugs@theporch.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <glowbugs@theporch.com>
Subject: GLOWBUGS digest 320
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Please send list server requests to listproc@theporch.com
Status: O

			    GLOWBUGS Digest 320

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: Regenerative Design
	by jeffd@coriolis.com (Jeff Duntemann)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 08:53:12 -0700
From: jeffd@coriolis.com (Jeff Duntemann)
To: mjsilva@ix.netcom.com
Cc: glowbugs@theporch.com
Subject: Re: Regenerative Design
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19961014084902.00eebee4@ntserver.coriolis.com>

>It's not a "newer" idea, since it was probably first tried about a week 
>after Armstrong demonstrated his regenerative detector, but consider 
>using a separate local oscillator feeding your regenerative (but not 
>oscillating) detector.  This is simply a DC receiver with a 
>regenerative mixer, which leads to a large increase in both selectivity 
>and gain over a standard DC receiver, while minimizing the pulling 
>effects of swaying antennas and strong nearby signals.
>
>73,
>Mike, KK6GM

Mike, do you have any citations in the literature discussing this sort of
circuit?  I have a HUGE library of old ham magazines and would love to see a
real circuit.

Thanks!

--73--

--Jeff Duntemann KG7JF
  Scottsdale, Arizona


------------------------------

End of GLOWBUGS Digest 320
**************************

