Mendele: Yiddish literature and language ______________________________________________________ Contents of Vol. 4.228 December 11, 1994 1) Introduction (Gil Wiedermann) 2) Yiddish theater in Germany(Michael Steinlauf) 3) Nit and nisht (Dovid Braun) 1)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 94 17:02:24 From: gil.wiedermann@chrysalis.org Subject: Introduction I have been very interested in Yiddish for a long time. I have started trying to really learn Yiddish for a few months now. Here in Dallas we have started a small Yiddish group -- just 4 of us. One of our members took the University of Wisconsin correspondence course, and another has attended the Oxford summer program. I am studying Uriel Weinreich's College Yiddish in my spare time. I studied Der Yiddisher Lerer several months ago to sort of "jump start" my Yiddish from literally nothing. I wish I could take off a few weeks from work and go to the Columbia or Oxford program but I can't take off from work that long. My current plan is to take the University of Wisconsin correspondence course soon. However before I do that I would gladly accept any comments or suggestions from anyone on good ways to learn Yiddish. I live in Dallas and unfortunately the "pickings are slim" for learning it. Nevertheless, challenges are meant to be overcome. I would like to know about any programs, courses, methods, etc. that someone could suggest. I realize it would be better to spend a few semesters in class, but "a bisl un a bisl vert a fule shisl" as they say. I found out about the mailing list from Itzik Gottesman who teaches Yiddish at the University of Texas at Austin. A little extra about me: I'm 31 years old, single and looking, a CPA with the power company here, TU Electric. I have a BBA from UT Austin and an MBA from UT Dallas. That's really all about me. I'm ready to read and learn from the rest of you! Gil Wiedermann 2)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 1994 15:25:17 -0500 (EST) From: m_steinlauf@acad.fandm.edu Subject: Yiddish theater in Germany In response to David Brenner's query about Yiddish theater in Imperial and Weimar Germany: There were two papers on the subject at the Yiddish theater conference in Warsaw a year ago. Both these papers, as well as two others on Yiddish theater in Vienna, were by graduate students working under Prof.Hans-Peter Bayerdorfer at the Institut fur Theaterwissenschaft of the University of Munich, 8000 Munchen 22, Ludwigstr. 25. I have abstracts of these papers; contact me privately and I'll be happy to share them. In addition, a young Polish scholar presented a paper (of which I also have an abstract) on Yiddish theater in Danzig in the 1930's. Michael Steinlauf 3)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 1994 22:53:54 EST From: dovid@mit.edu Subject: nit and nisht Dvosye Bilik: I have heard it said and seen it written that _nit_ is largely the litvish form and that _nisht_ is largely everybody else's form. Poylishe yidn are well-known for _nish'_ and from litvishe yidn, you are bound to here (predominantly, always?) _nit_, and loss of the /t/ when _nit_ meets the prefix _ge-_. For example, [nigeven] = 'nit geven', [nigehat] = 'nit gehat'. I said "pseudo-litvakes" because, in my Yiddish which has most of the vowels of litvish Yiddish, _nit_ and _nisht_ are interchangeable. In fact, they can even coincide: gornit nisht, gornisht nit. (You will also see this is print. It has struck me as especially common in Soviet Yiddish publications. They're mostly under the influence of litvish [Northeastern] and voliner [Southeastern] Yiddish. Why Soviet Yiddish should be so gung-ho over them is beyond me, though.) But notwithstanding my "litvisher yikhes" -- most of my vowels, that is -- I also have a thing or two that a true-blue litvak doesn't, and that's the sound [ow] which alternates in free variation with [oy], as in [arojs] and [arows]. Not to mention a couple of lexical items which are more commonly associated with voliner Yiddish. So I'm never sure of classifying myself as a litvak. I'm not familiar with the towns you, Dvosye Bilik, mentioned, but if they're Lithuania/Latvia proper and if your memory of nit/nisht-interchangeability is correct, then the received knowledge that _nisht_ is uncommon in litvish usage is wrong. Maybe the Atlas will treat us to a clearer picture? Furthermore about the classification: a litvak tsu a litvak iz nit glaykh. People who say [teyre] and [aroys]/[aruys] are usually classified as litvakes by other people; that doesn't mean that they classify _themselves_ as such. I think I've told this story on Mendele before: once talking with my grandmother (born and raised in Sukhovolye, in the Sakolke county [powiat] in the province of Grodne) about our "litvishkayt", she said that only in America was she called a "litvetshke" (and quite obviously: because of her vowels). My question: "Vos far a yidn zaynen mir den?" Her answer: "Vaysrusishe." (And historically, the area between Grodne and Byalistok is White Russia.) Having heard us referred to as "vaysrusishe" and being a tad familiar with the Slavic languages, I asked whether she had ever heard "vaysrusish" or known "vaysrusn" (all my life I had only known of the local Slavic language as being Polish and the non-Jewish inhabitants of her town as being Poles). The answer: "There is no such thing [as a White Russian or White Russian language]", i.e. these just didn't exist in her area, although the area itself was called (amongst Jews at least) White Russia (since historically this _was_ White Russia). I have heard the same litvish-vaysrusish distinction from other people as well. M. Schaechter remarked on this distinction somewhere, where he notes tellingly that the Vaad Arbe Arotses ['Council of 4 Lands'] was comprised of "poyln, lite, raysn [=vaysrusland], zamet". (I think these were the 4 components. Whatever they were, two of them were definitely _lite_ and _raysn_, showing that the communities definitely held themselves to be distinct.) And that's the story. p.s. While /t/ falls out before the prefix _ge-_ in true-blue litvish speech (as far as I have heard), it doesn't fall out in my psuedo-litvish (read: "vaysrusish") speech. So _nit geven_ is pronounced [nidgeven] and not [nigeven]. Dovid Braun ______________________________________________________ End of Mendele Vol. 4.228 Mendele has 2 rules: 1. Provide a meaningful Subject: line 2. Sign your article (full name please) A Table of Contents is now available via anonymous ftp, along with weekly updates. Anonymous ftp archives available on: ftp.mendele.trincoll.edu in the directory pub/mendele/files Archives available via gopher on: gopher.cic.net Send articles to: mendele@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu Send change-of-status messages to: listserv@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu a. For a temporary stop: set mendele nomail b. To resume delivery: set mendele mail c. To subscribe: sub mendele first_name last_name d. To unsubscribe kholile: unsub mendele Other business: nmiller@mail.trincoll.edu