Mendele: Yiddish literature and language ______________________________________________________ Contents of Vol. 4.355 March 7, 1995 1) The YIVO find in Lithuania (Dan Leeson) 2) Yoshe, Heshl et al. (Dovid Braun) 3) Skotsl kumt (Leon Kestenbaum) 4) Skotsl kumt (Bob Rothstein) 1)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 1995 14:50:03 EST From: leeson@aspen.fhda.edu Subject: The YIVO find in Lithuania Last night around midnight, CNN had a lengthy piece on the find in Lithuania and its transportation to New York YIVO. This is not new because there have been several mentions of it on this board. However, there was one item spoken of in the CNN report that was, to my ears, quite new. It was explicitly stated that only a small portion of the material was sent to New York and that the remainder would be kept in Lithuania and parceled out to YIVO in New York only when the parcel then in New York was returned to Lithuania. So they describe a 10% New York, 90% Lithuania holding of the materials with NY's piece going back to Lithuania each time that NY wanted a new portion. The impression given was that NY would act as a curator, physically restoring, cataloging, preserving, etc. the portion then in its hands and then return it all to Lithuania in order to get the next piece of work. I'm not making this up, though the CNN broadcast may have done so. Is this description even vaguely correct or were the facts misrepresented? Dan Leeson Los Altos, California 2)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 1995 19:30:29 EST From: dovid@mit.edu Subject: Yoshe, Heshl et al. Thanks, Elye Juni, for the remarks. I was uncomfortable with my hypothesis as well (that at some point _yehoyshue_ was stressed on the 2nd syllable). It is just that Yiddish diminutive personal names usually make use of the stressed syllable of the "oiginal" name, if nothing else. So _shie_ (and the ensuing _shike, shitsye, shikl_) are no surprises; _heshl_ and _yoshe_, on the other hand, are. The same problem is seen in _iser_ (thanks, Meylekh): from the name _yisro'el_ it is no surprise that the guy is called _srol, srolke, srulik, srultshe_, but it *is* a surprise that _(y)isro'el_ went to _i'ser(l)_. Bekitser, I don't what the answer is but we know what the question is, at least. If there was a time when _yeho'(y)shue_ was the form in Yiddish, then _yoshe_ and _heshl_ are explained: yeho'shue --> yo'shue --> yoshe yeho'shue --> ho'shue --> he'shl (by umlauting, as in hOr~hErele, gOt~gEter) I put the 2nd "y" in parentheses a few lines up because, perhaps like _yosef_, this khoylem-vov was (is?) dialectally pronounced [o] and not [oy]; that is, in "litvish" Yiddish the name is pronounced [yeysef] and in the other dialects (all? or only "poylish" Yiddish) the name is pronounced _yosef_ (and not *_yoysef_, as the general pattern would lead us to expect). (Note that _yosl_ is therefore no surprise: it derives from _yosef_ and not *_yoysef_.) As for ante(-ante-ante)penultimate stress, there's _kalo'nimus_, _ro'sheshone_ (in "litvish" Yiddish), _akha'zhvereysh_ (in my "litvish" Yiddish). So they are possible, if uncommon. How were you taught in kheyder to pronounce Dovidameylekh's friend's name: [yo'ynesn] or [yoyno'sn/yenos'n]? (I think both are available in the dialects. And do you concur that nobody in Yiddish speaking communities -- at least the ones you have access to -- is actually called by this name? If anything, it's _nosn_.) "Be me well and strong" Dovid Braun 3)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 21:51:33 -0500 From: Leon.L.M.K.Kestenbaum@Legal.sprinta1.sprint.com Subject: Skotsl kumt Perhaps it is time to move on, but I would like to khazer iber nokh a mol the expression "skutsl kumt." Skutsl kumt is the greeting Gimpel recieves from his soon-to-be bride, Elke. Bashevis Singer writes "a ponim gevust ver ich bin, veil ze tut oif mir a kuk un zugt -- Skutsl kumt, r'iz du der yuldt." Saul Bellow translates this as "Evidently she knew who I was. She took a look at me and said 'Look who's here! He's come, the drip.'" This would suggest that the expression "skutsl kumt" is: (1) not limited to greeting women; (2) not a reaction of surprise in response to a visit; and, (3) not a warm or complimentary greeting. At least from the example in Gimpel the Fool, Keyle Goodman would seem to have it about right. The expression connotes sarcasm, as in "look what the cat dragged in." Leon Kestenbaum Potomac, MD 4)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 1995 23:54:40 -0500 (EST) From: rar@slavic.umass.edu Subject: Skotsl kumt The expression _skotsl kumt_ had a fairly extensive discussion in the (relatively) early days of Mendele. See 1.48, 1.161 and 1.183-185 (the last of these with etymological proposals from _Yidishe shprakh_ and _Filologishe shriftn_). Bob Rothstein ______________________________________________________ End of Mendele Vol. 4.355 Mendele has 2 rules: 1. Provide a meaningful Subject: line 2. Sign your article (full name please) A Table of Contents is now available via anonymous ftp, along with weekly updates. Anonymous ftp archives available on: ftp.mendele.trincoll.edu in the directory pub/mendele/files Archives available via gopher on: gopher.cic.net Send articles to: mendele@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu Send change-of-status messages to: listserv@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu a. For a temporary stop: set mendele nomail b. To resume delivery: set mendele mail c. To subscribe: sub mendele first_name last_name d. To unsubscribe kholile: unsub mendele Other business: nmiller@mail.trincoll.edu