Mendele: Yiddish literature and language ______________________________________________________ Contents of Vol. 6.246 March 2, 1997 1) Ende oysiyes (Rick Turkel) 2) Ende oysiyes (A. Joseph Ross) 3) Ende oysiyes (Sholem Yafe) 1)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 11:42:11 -0500 From: rturkel@cas.org Subject: Ende oysiyes I know I should probably stop beating a dead horse, but ellen prince's question in Vol. 6.243: does anyone really think that there were non-jews in the kremlin who (a) could read the hebrew alphabet and (b) gave a damn how yiddish words were spelled? demands an answer. It was ellen who cautioned earlier (6.240) about "keeping our time frame straight." Of course there were no "non-Jews in the Kremlin ...," but there were plenty of _Jews_ there at the time who had been raised in more or less frum, Yiddish-speaking households and who were literate in Yiddish, from Trotsky on down. Especially for them as Communists, with all their anti-nationalist rhetoric, the idea that Jews would maintain _any_ connection to their "antiquated" ways was anathema. Many of the most strident anti-smoking advocates are ex-smokers themselves. or is it so upsetting that the reform came from jews, and from jews who were among the most highly literate in yiddish nokh? It's not upsetting, it's just a little hard to believe that, out of the blue, the literati would favor excising an important cultural element from the language as it had been written for hundreds of years. on the contrary, it's the convention that the *right wing* adopted (and that survives today, at least outside the ex-ussr) that needs explaining -- how religious fanaticism intruding on a purely secular issue results in the failure to achieve the desired logical spelling reform. As I understand it, there was little in the way of a right or left wing within Yiddish much before the turn of the 20th century in Eastern Europe. Jewish society of that time and place was fairly closed; most of those who gave up any semblance of religious observance left the shtetl for the big city, and left Yiddish behind as well. Those who continued to use Yiddish (at least the men, anyway) had at least some familiarity with Hebrew; that was the setting in which the Hebrew component of Yiddish became incorporated in to the language and in which the orthography as we know it in the West crystallized. It seems to me that you've got it backwards - it was the secularists of a later time that came along and attempted to alter a system that had been accepted universally and had always served its purpose reasonably well. Even fairly uneducated women could read the tzena ur'ena and other such literature in the traditional orthography. Rick Turkel 2)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 23:37:06 -0500 (EST) From: lawyer@world.std.com Subject: Soviet spelling "reform" Ellen Prince wonders [6.243] how the spelling reform in the early USSR could have been ordered from above, and thinks that this would have had to be done by "non-jews in the kremlin who (a) could read the hebrew alphabet and (b) gave a damn how yiddish words were spelled". Non-Jews? At that time, there were Jews highly-placed in the Communist Party (Trotsky, for example) who could have been quite knowledgeable about Yiddish and had ideological reasons for ordering a spelling reform. The early Communist Party, after the revolution, tended to think of anti-semitism as one of those Bourgeoise and Czarist notions that they were going to do away with. Anti-semitism returned later, especially under Stalin. A. Joseph Ross Boston 3)---------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 03:18:41 -0500 (EST) From: lakejaffe@aol.com Subject: Sovetish Heymland spelling This is with reference to the Soviet style of writing Yiddish, as discussed by several people in Vol. 6.240. I happen to have a copy of Sovetish Heymland No. 11 dated 1965. Words ending in kh use the long form, as we do. The same is true of words ending in m, n, f, or ts. The silent aleph is used as we do, before a vov or a yud when either of these would otherwise be the first letter of the word. What's missing are veyz, khes, kof, sin, tof, and sof. And guess what. It's a pleasure to read! Many English words are derived from Greek, and we do quite well writing them with English letters. Would anybody vote to start writing them in Greek letters?! So why can't Yiddish spell Yiddish words of Hebraic or Aramaic origin in Yiddish style? It can, and Sovetish Heymland did, and -- for a guy like me -- it's a real pleasure! I don't have to search for the unfamiliar-looking words in Steven Jacobson's valuable little book! Sholem Yafe ______________________________________________________ End of Mendele Vol. 6.246 Mendele has 2 rules: 1. Provide a meaningful Subject: line 2. Sign your article (full name please) Send articles to: mendele@yalevm.cis.yale.edu Send change-of-status messages to: listserv@yalevm.cis.yale.edu a. For a temporary stop: set mendele nomail b. To resume delivery: set mendele mail c. To subscribe: sub mendele first_name last_name d. To unsubscribe kholile: unsub mendele Other business: nmiller@mail.trincoll.edu ****Getting back issues**** 1. Anonymous ftp archives are available. ftp ftp.mendele.trincoll.edu in the directory pub/mendele/files A table of contents is also available, along with weekly updates. 2. Mendele archives can also be reached as follows: via WWW: http://sunsite.unc.edu/yiddish/mewais.html via gopher: gopher://sunsite.unc.edu/11/../.pub/academic/languages/yiddish/mendele via ftp: ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/academic/languages/yiddish/mendele