1995.07.09 / Walter R /  A new theorical explication for Cold Fusion is born.
     
Originally-From: "Walter E.R. Cassani" <cassani@Linux.InfoSquare.it>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: A new theorical explication for Cold Fusion is born.
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 00:41:16 +0200
Organization: Comm 2000 - Milan, Italy


Goodbye Quantum Mechanics, and Cromodynamics.

A new nuclear model derives from a new unitary theory.

Albert was right, a new, more complete, causal, theory is born.

This is: The Wave Theory of the Field.

It is available in  <<  http://www.inet.it/cassani/index.html  >> 

The INDEX of  "The Wave Theory of the Field" is:

LETTER
The Letter contains the provocatory announce that : " a new, unitary 
Wave Theory, for justification of masses and fields, is born ".
The original idea coming from : "Il Campo Unificato" -Robota srl-.
(The Unified Field) published 10/09/84 in Milan -Italy-

ABSTRACT
It contains arguments of the book translation, published 
in Italy in 1989, entitled " La Teoria Ondulatoria del Campo ",
more widely treated in the next book in 1994:
"Albert Aveva Ragione - DIO NON GIOCA A DADI"
"Albert Was Right - GOD DON'T PLAY DICE".


INTRODUCTION
It shows the concept of space-time, that qualify the actual model
of space-time continuum, to clarify the idea that everybody
form about it, in order to define new ideas to create a " discrete " 
model of space-time.

PERTURBATION OF SCHILD'S DISCRETE SPACE-TIME
It shows the nature and properties of a Schild's discrete space-time, 
that can be interpreted like waves of perturbations of its own metrical 
structure, and can be read like perturbations of a new, plausible, 
discrete, metrical " Ether ".

WAVE HYPOTHESIS OF THE MASS FIELDS
Starting from equality of two energies: Einstein's energy  E = m c^2  
and  Planck's energy  E = h v, we make the hypothesis that all 
subatomic particles are elementary sources of spherical waves that, 
in complex, constitute all spherical fields ascribing to particles.

WAVE MOMENTUM
With this elementary waves we discover a new law for elementary
interaction light - particle that involve a simple symmetry principle.

ENERGY AND ITS VARIATIONS
Where we discover the real variation's nature of Photon, and the 
relation between elementary waves and De Broglie waves. 

THE RELATIVE SYMMETRY PRINCIPLE
This simple and elementary symmetry principle constitutes the
unique law that regulates the four interactions, that unify, under a 
omnicomprensive vision, Quantum Mechanics and all other 
physical dynamics.

THE INERTIA'S WAVE NATURE
We discover that, the wave nature of masses, and the variation's
nature of Relative Symmetry Principle, conduces to consider
the Inertia like natural and " local " consequence bodies' wave structure.

THE WAVE NATURE OF QUANTUM GRAVITY
It appens that, the same model of the variation's nature of the 
Relative Symmetry Principle, applied to Inertia, results an extraordinary
consequent model to describe a Wave Quantum Gravity interaction.

TERMINAL VELOCITIES FOR MASSES
The exclusive wave nature of bodies, and the space-time
quantization, displays the impossibility for masses to surpass 
the velocity of own waves, that move at light velocity, and to reduce 
its wavelength, for Doppler effect, under the "discrete" length. 

THE FIFTH INTERACTION
Because impossibility to return at continuum space-time concept,
we can comprehend impossibility to reduce a wavelength, that 
describes bodies' mass, to infinitesimal. And consequently,  
we can understand existence of a Fifth Repulsive Interaction 
that acts with more evidence in cosmological field, between 
the maxi-bodies, and prevent any indiscriminate increase of masses.  

WAVE INTERPRETATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
An unexpected, simple completion of General Relativity discovers
the inevitable, causal connection with Quantum Mechanics, realizing
the dream so long time pursued from Albert.

WAVE DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPTON EFFECT
With the wave interpretation of experimental data, derived from Compton
effect, we immediately show possibilities, verifying the Relative Symmetry
Principle's capacities, applying the new unification between QM and GR.

WAVE MODEL OF ELECTRON AND PROTON
A new extrapolation of Compton effect, conduces to discover an 
extraordinary resonance's wave mechanism, that allows to verify the 
possible existence of a creative wave's system, so far called : " particle ".

WAVE CREATION OF PAIRS
The generalization of the same extraordinary resonance's wave mechanism
allows to justify the phenomenon of creation of pairs.

WAVE INTERPRETATION OF THE LORENTZ FORCE
The application of a dynamical orientation, for the same wave mechanism
that we identify with particle, shows that happens wen it is submitted 
to magnetic field, showing that the Lorentz force is a consequence of 
Doppler relativistic effect of particle's oriented wave system.

THE WAVE NATURE OF ELECTRIC CHARGE
The geometrical analysis, of the "discrete", shows that particle's wave 
structure presents the characteristics, that we have so far justified and
quantified with the electrical charge concept.   

THE VECTORIAL DESCRIPTION OF PARTICLES
The specularity of the pairs' creation allows to consider the opposition
particle - antiparticle, that conduces to justify the electromagnetic
interactions like violations of characteristic  " chirality's properties " 
of the wave mechanism - particles.

THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVE ISOTROPY
From the VECTORIAL description of the wave mechanism - particles
we can justify existence of one principle of relative isotropy
that comprehends in a generalization the Relative Symmetry Principle.

STATISTICAL POSSIBILITIES FOR CREATION 
OF SINGLES PARTICLES
We deduce from quantification of statistical possibilities, inherent 
in geometrical wave structures, to overlap particle-antiparticle, 
in annihilation phenomena, from which we can concept 
a causal wave chain to create matter in elementary particles. 

MASS DEFECT AND WAVE NUCLEAR FORCE
The comparation, to nuclear distances, of two Protons-wave model
show that at distance 1 Fermi the electromagnetic interactions are 
absent, because are absent the waves that characterize electrical 
interactions. This implies a different point of view for the forces in act.
From this different view we can support an original explication
of Cold Fusion.  

THE NEUTRON WAVE MODEL
The different wave structures and interactions between the nucleons
conduces to consider a new possibility for a Neutron wave model.

BETA DECAY IN WAVE MODEL
The new wave model shows a causal chain that justify, better that 
actual way, the entire process of Beta Decay and, consequently,
allows the wave nature of Neutrinos.

THE MUON AND PION WAVE MODEL
From wave model of Beta Decay process we can deduce all masses,
charges, energies, spins, and decays of all particles' family.

THE WAVE ATOM
The atom's quantum energy's levels can now be interpreted, like wave
resonance's organizations, of the wave source-electron in resonance's
orbits, that contain and describe integer numbers of Doppler 
wavelength on the specific orbit. 

THE WAVE CONSTANT OF FINE STRUCTURE
The complete, causal comprehension to wave nature, of Constant
of Fine Structure, conclude from presence of  two relativistic Doppler 
wavelength of two waves that move in opposite directions
on the same resonance orbit, that obey to more parameters
that condition their wave resonance states. 

LIGHT LIKE WAVE'S VARIATION 
The final consequence, of existence of resonant orbits and
non resonant orbits for the wave source-electron, that jump between
two different states of resonance, concludes itself with a directional 
wave emission, of a modulation of frequency, that we call : " Photon ".

Good reading, and...... please to destroy it, if you be able.

                         Walter E. R. Cassani
**************************************************
                   cassani@linux.infosquare.it

     For FTP of  " The Wave Theory of the Field "
    <<  ftp.infosquare.it  >>  in  pub/theory/ 
     Files: wtf-1.doc , wtf-2.doc  =  1.7 Mb 
     in Microsoft Word 6.
               
 For the Theory in W W Web, with formulae and figures:
      <<   http://www.inet.it/cassani/index.html  >>

**************************************************
 








cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudencassani cudfnWalter cudlnR cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszL cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.08 /  KAnko /  Re: The Farce of Physics
     
Originally-From: kanko@aol.com (KAnko)
Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.objectivism,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.
stro,sci.energy,sci.misc,sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics.
usion,sci.physics.particle,sci.research,sci.skeptic
Subject: Re: The Farce of Physics
Date: 8 Jul 1995 20:34:18 -0400
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)

First off, I am also sorry for all the cross-posting, but I am in a hurry.


Now, Mark, take a look at the book "The Experimental Foundations of
Particle Physics" by Cahn and Goldhaber.  For most of the past 200 years,
experiment has driven theory.  NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!  Quarks were
not postulated first.  Two experimental results, the particle zoo and
electron-proton scattering, were responsible for the quark idea.  Just
like the periodic table, the particle zoo was most easily explained by
hadron and meson constituates, ie the quarks.  And Feymann and others
proposed the partons, or quarks, to explain the electron-proton scattering
data.  

You have probably never seen a molecule either, but does that mean they
don't exist.  Have you ever seen Juan Carlos of Spain???  Does that mean
he does not exist???  Take some time to read up and get educated before
you start flaming physics.  For the most part, experimentation drives
these theories.  Not always, but for the most part.  When there are
periods with little new experimental data, some theorist have a tendency
to go a bit blackboard crazy, but get your history straight.
Dr. Kevin Ankoviak

"If you find truth, beauty's just a decay away!!"
cudkeys:
cuddy8 cudenkanko cudlnKAnko cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 /   /  New Gravitational force
     
Originally-From: ejeong@pinet.aip.org (euejin_jeong)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: New Gravitational force
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 02:47:03 GMT
Organization: AIP




    The propulsion mechanism of an infinitely advanced beings has been
    thoroughly studied and explained.
    They may have been visiting us using this method. The reason
    for this assertion is because the physical law is the same everywhere
    in the universe.
    They must be using the anti-gravity force coming from
    the gravitational dipole moment. Antimatter is not the solution to
    the problem. Formidable task of creating and storing of antimatter
    simply rules out such possibility.

    So, the next candidate is the gravitational dipole moment.
    The nice thing about it is that it is controllable. There are
    many other attractive features in the theory as following.

    1. It describes the controllable anti-gravity force.(propulsion of
    a vehicle out of water into the air and out toward the space)

    2. The gravitational dipole moment develops into a wormhole in the
    extreme limit of its propulsion according to the natural extension of
    the theory, which means you can travel faster than the speed of
    light.(first theoretical demonstration of its kind: the method of creating
    the MACROSCOPIC wormhole, not the microscopic one resulting from the
    quantum fluctuation)

    3. It revives the Mach's principle which has not been fully incorporated
    into the general relativity.

    4. It explains the origin of the centrifugal force.

    5. It explains how the aliens might use this method without carrying
    the huge amount of fuel required for the interstellar travel.

    6. It is consistent with the general relativity + Mach's principle.

    7. It explains the anormalous red shift which is one of the most
    baffling problems in the present day cosmology.

    8. It even suggests the possibility of producing the unlimited
    local energy purely by the electro-mechanical method.

    9. It explains the DUAL character of the center of mass of an
    object when the gravitational dipole moment is created.(which means
    the object is at the two places at the same time)

    10. It suggests the controlled experiment for the test of the general
    relativity.(none so far has been proposed)

    11. It explains the cause of the crop circle especially its swirling.

    Why then the theory has been hidden so far ?
    Simple. Because the gravitational dipole term in the linearized
    field equation of the general relativity has been neglected partly
    due to the fact that there was no observed natural phenomena
    associated with it and also partly because the mechanism of creating
    the non-zero dipole term was elusive in its nature. The fact that
    the exact metric solution to the general relativity for this case
    is very complicated and unknown may have been another reason.

    Consequences ?

    1. Scientific Revolution
    2. Total Overhaul of NASA
    3. Global Recognition of Alien Civilization
    4. Obsolete Airplane
    5. Wide Spread Space Exploration
    6. Unlimited Pollution Free Energy
    7. Plummeting Oil Price
    8. Social Revolution (Fall of Capitalism)
    9. Religious Revolution (Fall of Vatican)=* recognition of many
    other God created intelligent beings *
    10. Pollution, Hunger and Traffic Free Society
    11. Honeymoon to the Mars and Pluto

    E-mail me if you have any questions. I'm

    1. Looking for experimentalists who would perform the test.
    2. Looking for a developer/developers of this idea.
    3. Looking for someone to promote this finding to become the national
       debate.
    4. Looking for someone to promote this finding to become the
       subject of cyber conference among physicists/scientists.

    EueJin Jeong Ph.D.
    E-mail Address: Euejin@Chollian.dacom.co.kr

cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudenejeong cudln cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 /   /  New Gravitational force
     
Originally-From: ejeong@pinet.aip.org (euejin_jeong)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: New Gravitational force
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 02:38:10 GMT
Organization: AIP



The message is not going out somehow what is wrong ?

cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudenejeong cudln cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszS cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 /   /  Re: Quantum Mechanics is dead.
     
Originally-From: ejeong@pinet.aip.org (euejin_jeong)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Quantum Mechanics is dead.
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 02:45:51 GMT
Organization: AIP


Very interesting. I'll look carefully for its success. Does it
explain everything that the QM has been doing so far ?

cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudenejeong cudln cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszS cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / Robin Spaandonk /  Re: Any cool cold fusion?
     
Originally-From: rvanspaa@netspace.net.au (Robin van Spaandonk)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Any cool cold fusion?
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 10:33:14 GMT
Organization: Improving

On 7 Jul 1995 13:05:26 GMT, prasad, 71155.3116@compuserve.com wrote:

[snip]
>Sure.  The invention & patent is mine alone, so if you're serious about
>exploring more may contact me directly.

Prasad,

Could you post the patent number, so that we can look it up?




Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk <rvanspaa@pop.netspace.net.au>
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Man is the creature that comes into this world knowing everything,
Learns all his life,
And leaves knowing nothing.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

cudkeys:
cuddy09 cudenrvanspaa cudfnRobin cudlnSpaandonk cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / Richard Schultz /  Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
     
Originally-From: schultz@garnet.berkeley.edu (Richard Schultz)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
Date: 9 Jul 1995 12:57:41 GMT
Organization: Philosophers of the Dangerous Maybe

In article <3tervv$9b9@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>,
Tom Potter  <tdp@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>I certainly intend to expose flamers at every opportunity as they
>are the problem, rather than the solution.
>They inhibit shy and modest people from sharing their ideas.
>They are the main cause of noise in the system; due to their posts,
>the indignation of the people they attack, and the posts of people,
>like me, who can't tolerate their negative impact on society.

Which is all fine and good, except that he had earlier written, in 
article <3susto$ivk@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>, that

> I am an equal opportunity flamer.
> I have no inhibitions about flaming Blacks, Whites, Christians,
> Jews, conservatives or liberals where truth is involved.

Any time you want to take your own advice, Mr. Potter, and stop 
bothering us, it will be fine with me.
--
					Richard Schultz

"You don't even have a clue as to which clue you're missing." -- Miss Manners
cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudenschultz cudfnRichard cudlnSchultz cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / Tom Potter /  Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
     
Originally-From: tdp@ix.netcom.com (Tom Potter )
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
Date: 9 Jul 1995 16:55:20 GMT
Organization: Netcom

In <3tojo5$snh@agate.berkeley.edu> schultz@garnet.berkeley.edu (Richard Schultz) writes: 

>Any time you want to take your own advice, Mr. Potter, and stop 
>bothering us, it will be fine with me.
>--
>					Richard Schultz

"Stop bothering us?" 
I didn't know you were pregnant Schultze.

I knew you folks in "the City" had strange and perverted ways,
but pregnant??? How did this happen?

cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudentdp cudfnTom cudlnPotter cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszS cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / Tom Potter /  Universal time per charge constant, derived.
     
Originally-From: tdp@ix.netcom.com (Tom Potter )
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Universal time per charge constant, derived.
Date: 9 Jul 1995 17:07:51 GMT
Organization: Netcom

I would like to correct an error I made in my first post on the
"charge per time constant", and show how this constant is derived.

Here is how time ( and mass ) and charge are related:
I will use the hydrogen atom as an example.

C    = the universal space per time constant. ( the speed of light )
G    = the universal gravitational constant.

mass[a] = proton mass
mass[b] = electron mass
t[c] = 1 / 2 / Rydberg constant / C   = a time common to both masses.
f[a] = the proton fine structure constant.
v[a] = velocity of mass[a] = f[a] * C
f[b] = the fine structure constant. ( for the electron )
v[b] = velocity of mass[b] = f[b] * C
mu   = the permeability of space
per  = the permittivity of space

  m[a] * G * velocity[a]^3 * t[c] / C^6
= m[a] * G * f[a]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= m[b] * G * velocity[b]^3 * t[c] / C^6
= m[b] * G * f[b]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= Q^2 * G * mu / 2 / C^4
= Q^2 * G / 2 / per / C^6
= 1.3322429 * 10^-88 in MKS units.

As I have shown in previous articles:
X = a universal time per mass constant = G / C^3

If we replace G / C^3 with X in the equations above, we have:

  m[a] * X * velocity[a]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= m[a] * X * f[a]^3 * t[c]
= m[b] * X * velocity[b]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= m[b] * X * f[b]^3 * t[c]
= Q^2 * X * mu / 2 / C
= Q^2 * X / 2 / per / C^3

t[a] = the time equivalence of a mass[a] = mass[a] * X
t[b] = the time equivalence of a mass[b] = mass[b] * X

Replacing masses with their time equivalences we have:

  t[a] * velocity[a]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= t[a] * f[a]^3 * t[c]
= t[b] * velocity[b]^3 * t[c] / C^3
= t[b] * f[b]^3 * t[c]
= Q^2 * X * mu / 2 / C
= Q^2 * X / 2 / per / C^3

As can be seen, X / 2 / per / C^3 equates charge squared
to time squared so ( X / 2 / per / C^3 )^.5
equates charge with time.

U = universal charge per constant
  = ( X / 2 / per / C^3 ) ^-.5
  = ( 2 * per * C^3 / X )^.5
  = ( 2 * per * C^6 / G )^.5     ( X = G / C^3 )

So the correct universal charge per time ( U ) constant is:

U = ( 2 * permittivity * C^6 / G )^.5 = 1.3881044 X 10^25 amps

As can be seen, 2 * permittivity / C^3 is a universal constant,
much like G / C^3.

I would appreciate any feedback regarding typos or other
errors in this post. Please email me if you are reluctant
to make a public comment.

cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudentdp cudfnTom cudlnPotter cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / Thomas Zemanian /  Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
     
Originally-From: ts_zemanian@pnl.gov (Thomas S. Zemanian)
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
Date: 9 Jul 1995 19:12:08 GMT
Organization: Battelle PNL

In article <3tp1lo$aii@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, tdp@ix.netcom.com (Tom
Potter ) wrote:

> In <3tojo5$snh@agate.berkeley.edu> schultz@garnet.berkeley.edu (Richard
Schultz) writes: 
> 
> >Any time you want to take your own advice, Mr. Potter, and stop 
> >bothering us, it will be fine with me.
> >--
> >                                       Richard Schultz
> 
> "Stop bothering us?" 
> I didn't know you were pregnant Schultze.
> 
> I knew you folks in "the City" had strange and perverted ways,
> but pregnant??? How did this happen?

Allow me to add my voice to that of Dr. Schultz.  Can you not see, Mr.
Potter, that rabid flaming of the denizens of an entire newsgroup for the
crime of flaming (only a few of whom actually engage in such practices, by
the way) is a bit hypocritical?

It is common for the mad bomber to justify his violence by claiming to be
the defender of the weak and downtrodden.  It's still inappropriate. 
Claiming a lofty goal does not exonerate one's actions.

--Tom

--
The opinions expressed herein are mine and mine alone.  Keep your filthy hands off 'em! 
cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudents_zemanian cudfnThomas cudlnZemanian cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.08 / MARSHALL DUDLEY /  Re: Any cool cold fusion?
     
Originally-From: mdudley@brbbs.brbbs.com (MARSHALL DUDLEY)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Any cool cold fusion?
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 1995 19:49 -0500 (EST)

prasad, 71155.3116@compuserve.com writes:
 
-> Sure.  The invention & patent is mine alone, so if you're serious about
-> exploring more may contact me directly.
 
Please give me the patent number so I can look it up.  Thanks.
 
                                                                Marshall
 
cudkeys:
cuddy08 cudenmdudley cudfnMARSHALL cudlnDUDLEY cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszS cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.09 / C Harrison /  Periodic Post: Cold Fusion online at sunsite.unc.edu
     
Originally-From: harr@netcom.com (Charles (Chuck) Harrison)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Periodic Post: Cold Fusion online at sunsite.unc.edu
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 23:15:37 GMT
Organization: Fitful

This message is posted periodically to inform readers about on-line
data sources related to "cold fusion" which are located at the 
University of North Carolina SunSITE server.

Two public WAIS (Wide Area Information Server) sources are online:
(1) Dieter Britz's Bibliography (periodically updated), and
(2) A sci.physics.fusion archive (1989 to present).
WAIS provides for multiple keyword searches in these databases.  It
does _not_ support boolean logic in the searching :-(.

1.  If you are directly connected to Internet, you can log onto a public
    WAIS server at the University of North Carolina:
    %telnet sunsite.unc.edu
    ...
    login: swais
    ...
    TERM = (unknown) vt100
    It takes a minute to load ...

    <use ? for online help>
    <use /cold to locate the cold-fusion "Source" - the Britz biblio>
    < or use /fusion to locate the fusion-digest source>
    <follow the prompts to select the source and enter your keywords
     for searching>

2.  If you have a "gopher" client, you can use it for WAIS access.  Many 
    university campuses provide gopher as a public information service.
2a. On most systems, you first select an option labeled "Other Systems",
    then from that menu select "WAIS based information".  Since each
    gopher site creates its own menus, I can't tell you exactly where to
    go from there.
2b. If you can gopher to SunSITE, at UNC, navigate the menus down thru
    SunSITE archives..All archives..Academic..Physics..Cold-fusion.
    You will find the searchable databases (typically marked <?>), as
    well as the primary-literature files discussed below.
2c. If you can 'telnet' but not 'gopher', you may telnet to
    sunsite.unc.edu and login as 'gopher'.  Then follow 2a or 2b above.

3.  If you have World Wide Web (WWW) browser, such as Mosaic, Cello, or
    Lynx, you may use the following URL's:
     wais://sunsite.unc.edu/cold-fusion       Britz bibliography
     wais://sunsite.unc.edu/fusion-digest     newsgroup archive
     gopher://sunsite.unc.edu/11/../.pub/academic/physics/Cold-fusion

4.  If you have a WAIS client on your system (the most common ones are
    "swais" -- character-based, and "xwais" -- for X-Windows), use it.  The
    Britz source is called "cold-fusion" and it is listed in the 
    directory-of-servers.

    If you _want_ a WAIS client program to run on your system, several are
    available in the public domain.  Try ftp-ing to one of these sites:
      sunsite.unc.edu
      think.com

There are several additional files archived at sunsite (e.g. Bollinger's
Twist of Ribbon, preprints of the Fleischmann&Pons 1989 paper), which
are accessible by anonymous ftp.
    %ftp sunsite.unc.edu
    . . .
    >cd pub/academic/physics/Cold-fusion
    >dir
The collection (mostly primary papers) maintained by vince cate has been
copied over to pub/academic/physics/Cold-fusion/vince-cate.

Additional contributions are welcome; e-mail cfh@sunsite.unc.edu.
cudkeys:
cuddy9 cudenharr cudfnCharles cudlnHarrison cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.10 / Tom Potter /  Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
     
Originally-From: tdp@ix.netcom.com (Tom Potter )
Newsgroups: alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.physics,sci.physics.fusion,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: Has anyone convinced a crackpot?
Date: 10 Jul 1995 00:03:55 GMT
Organization: Netcom

In <ts_zemanian-0907951207060001@ts_zemanian.pnl.gov> ts_zemanian@pnl.go
 (Thomas S. Zemanian) writes: 

>It is common for the mad bomber to justify his violence by claiming to be
>the defender of the weak and downtrodden.  It's still inappropriate. 
>Claiming a lofty goal does not exonerate one's actions.
>
>--Tom

Why not?
cudkeys:
cuddy10 cudentdp cudfnTom cudlnPotter cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszS cudyr1995 
------------------------------
1995.07.10 / Scott Little /  Re: Potapov Device Test - Round 2
     
Originally-From: little@eden.com (Scott Little)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
Subject: Re: Potapov Device Test - Round 2
Date: 10 Jul 1995 00:14:42 GMT
Organization: EarthTech Int'l

In article <3tfdfj$m4m@netfs.dnd.ca>, wspage@ncs.dnd.ca (Bill Page) says:

>>In all of these tests, the bypass line was absent (see 
>>Discussion below).
>>
>
>Do you mean that the small outlet was closed?


Yes, it was plugged.

>In view of the similarities between the Potapov device and the
>Hilsch Tube heat pump, I think it would be interesting to
>look for any temperature differences between the small outlet
>and the large outlet. Can we assume that the "bypass line"
>(Is that the terminology used in the Yushmar literature? Or
>it this your assumed function of the line?) is there to feed
>water already at a higher temperature around the vortex?

In recent tests, with a "bypass" line that closely resembles the ones in
the various photos, I have made a rough attempt at measuring the
temperature of the line and found it to be essentially the same as the 
main tube (called the cavitation tube).  

As you will see in my next report, the bypass line is not a bypass at all
but rather a recirculation line.


>How difficult would it be for you to attach some sort of
>transducer (microphone) to the vortex tube? The purpose being
>to attempt to detect changes in the operating conditions.

Not difficult at all.  An interesting idea.  Subjectively speaking, the 
device is pretty quiet.  I hear some sounds that could be due to a water-
air interface slapping around...

A potential problem with the microphone is the presence of the pump
which is presently coupled to the P device with hard plumbing.  I'm
sure it makes some noise.

cudkeys:
cuddy10 cudenlittle cudfnScott cudlnLittle cudmo7 cudqt3 cudszM cudyr1995 
------------------------------
processed by cud.pl ver. 0.5 Mon Jul 10 04:37:03 EDT 1995
------------------------------
