Subject: Re: Wit & Wisdom of Fascist LaRouche

From: [email-masked] (Tom Warner)
Date: 20 Sep 92 15:51:12 GMT

NLG Civil Liberties Committee <[email-masked]> writes:

>This "LaRouche Sampler" of LaRouchian quotes was first 
>published in the Chicago Lawyer newspaper, April 1986

>The Beatles

>"The Beatles had no genuine musical talent, but were a 
>product shaped according to British Psychological Warfare 
>Division (Tavistock) specifications, and promoted in Britain by 
>agencies which are controlled by British intelligence."
>          "Why Your Child Became A Drug Addict"
>          Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., 
>          Campaigner Special Report, Copyright 1978

:) :) :) :)

Oh thank you Chip for including that one. Thank you so much.
And thanks for the whole article. Great work.

>History

>"History as it is taught in leading American universities 
>today is a deliberate systematic fraud. History textbooks in our 
>public schools, in particular insofar as they pertain to the 
>American Revolution and the issues leading up to the Civil War, 
>are total frauds." 
>          Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., Radio broadcast, WGPR,           
>          Detroit, March 20, 1979

Oh shit, I almost agree with that one. :)

>"Episcopagans"

>"The inner hierarchy of the Episcopagan church is properly 
>viewed not merely as something within the established Church of 
>England, but as a coordinating agency for an array of forces with 
>arms not only among Catholic, Protestant, and Eastern 
>autocephalic denominations....It controls, with complicity of 
>Venice, Libya's psychotic Colonel Khadafy, and most of the New 
>York Council on Foreign Relations, as well as the psychological 
>warfare and assassination arm of British intelligence, the London 
>Tavistock Institute."
>          "Why the Anglicans Want to Eliminate the Pope",
>          Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.,
>          Executive Intelligence Review, June 2, 1981

Wow, now I really regret not going to see the new Archbishop of Canterbury
when he swung through town last week. And not going with my parents to this
Church which is obviously much more interesting than it appeared to be.

Wow, and all this time I thought they were just singing in the church
choir. Rehearsals, yeah, that's the ticket, rehearsals ....
Those crafty little devils. I guess this explains why they bought us
those Beatles albums when we were kids. :)

>Impotence

>"To the extent that my physical powers do not prevent me, I 
>am now confident and capable of ending your [NCLC members'] 
>political - and sexual - impotence; the two are interconnected 
>aspects of the same problem."
>          "The Politics of Male Impotence",
>          Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., (under pen name L. Marcus)
>          NCLC Internal Document, August 16, 1973

I'm sure they are ....
:) :) :)

But what is this physical limitation of Lyndon's, and what does
it have to do with his ability to cure impotence? Inquiring minds
want to know.

Also, is there any truth to the rumor that Lyndon LaRouche shared
a cell with James Bakker?
Inquiring minds just *can't bear* not knowing that one.

Oh boy, this is almost as much fun as alt.fan.dan-quayle before
the plague of alt.fan.rush-limbaugh cross-posters. :) :) :)

Tom Warner

---

From: NLG Civil Liberties Committee <[email-masked]>
Date: 27 Sep 92 18:02 PDT

Steve, it's the offhanded lies that will catch you every time. There are
photographs of the victims of LaRouche's "Operation Mop-Up." Several people
were hospitalized. The violence was systematic and happened in several
cities. I have interviewed both victims and former LaRouchians who were
ordered to go beat people up.
   You claim to be an intellectual yet you accept as fact material from
notorious and convicted liars. My evidence comes from interviewing
first-hand witnesses and participants for my articles on LaRouche.
Where do you get your evidence?
-Chip Berlet
(P.S. Steve: go for the big lies...it worked for Hitler)

---

From: NLG Civil Liberties Committee <[email-masked]>
Date: 05 Oct 92 19:02 PDT

Steve: The LaRouche publications lie and mislead on a regular basis. You
repeat those lies and then refuse to take responsibility for seeing the 
pattern of lies that you repeat. You choose to repeat these lies, Steve,
so you are responsile for their appearing on the net.
   I have written dozens of articles exposing the lies and fraudulent
fundraising practices of the LaRouchians. I can document what I say.
The LaRouchians have sued me twice and harassed me and my family. I can
prove any fact and defend any opinion. I challenge you to give me an
example of a misleading statement regarding any factual situation
involving the LaRouchians. Keep in mind the difference from facts and
my conclusions and opinions. I will post documentation for <EVERY> allegation
I have made.
   -Chip Berlet