[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)

To: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
Subject: Fwd: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
From: terry@albert.animats.net
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 12:34:00 +1000 (EST)
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 1 Oct 1999 02:34:16 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <t-pg_B.A.0kF.n2B93@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

On 30 Sep, David Lawyer wrote:

>>Is there any good reason why we can't use the OpenSource Definition?
>>
> Yes.  First, it's for software, not docs.  But mainly it does not require 
> that licenses be free.

The latter is the best reason.

thanks
Terry

-- 
terry@albert.animats.net, terry@linux.org.au




--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Prev by Date: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: General Positive Feedback re: revision of site (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread