Re: RAID HOWTOs

[Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc@cu-portland.edu>]

Greg Ferguson wrote:
> 
> On Jan 20,  9:06am, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > Subject: Re: RAID HOWTOs
> > ...
> > This would also help people who want to help out
> > with the LDP by taking up maintence of HOWTOs that aren't being
> > maintained.
> 
> Would it help if I put together a list of those HOWTO's that haven't
> been modified in "X" amount of time, with pointers to the docs
> themselves?

I've noticed that a lot of the HOWTOs use a timespan of six months in
"dating" the document.  I.E. if this document is older than six months,
then check URL for more information.  Does this sound like a reasonable
timespan for the LDP to adopt?  I realize that some documents will last
much longer, and some won't last anywhere near that long, but on
average.

> 
> We would then have to determine if the doc itself is still relevent,
> in a given context.

This should just be a matter of having someone familiar with the subject
read over it.

> 
> This is something that could be done quickly. Perhaps the
> page containing this info would have a "mailto:"; pointer
> that would come back to this list? - "If you are interested in
> working on/modifying/etc this document click...".

Sounds good to me. 
	Greg

> 
> just a thought; lmk.
> 
> regards,
> 
> --
> Greg Ferguson     - s/w engr / mtlhd         | gferg@sgi.com
> SGI Tech Pubs     - http://techpubs.sgi.com  | 410-785-2334
> Linux Doc Project - http://www.linuxdoc.org  |
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org