[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal

To: poet@linuxports.com
Subject: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:25:39 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: dave@lafn.org, ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org, ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007210919370.23138-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>(message from Poet/Joshua Drake on Fri, 21 Jul 2000 09:42:27 -0700(PDT))
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007210919370.23138-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
Resent-date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 18:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <Qx-r4C.A.ARH.n9he5@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

The OpenContent license as I last checked it did not qualify as a free
license, so I hope you won't include it in your list.  (If you think
it has changed and I should recheck it, please let me know.)

The Open Publication license does qualify as a free license *if* the
options A and B are *not* used.  Please ask people to refrain from
using these options if they use the Open Publication license.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>

References:
- Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by Date: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread