Re: Current summit

[Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@bigfoot.com>]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:40:16AM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> This would be a "suggested" license correct? Not a Required license?

You're right :

1. we would provide a set of requirements that are currenly spread
between the manifesto and the former LDPL ; any license compatible with
the requirements would be allowed (for ex OPL-a-b, GFDL and MPL - that
would save us trouble)

2. we would just explain why we recommand either license if we do
recommand it (each license can have its advocate and its section).

-- 
Guylhem P. Aznar                               http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu                    http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -----  Benjamin Franklin


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org