From owner-riscy@pyramid.com  Fri Aug  6 04:48:13 1993
Received: from gossip.pyramid.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (4.1/tas-gen/1-30-93)
	id AA12742; Fri, 6 Aug 93 04:48:13 EDT
Received: from sword.eng.pyramid.com 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA03099; Fri, 6 Aug 93 01:48:04 -0700
Received: by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA02641; Fri, 6 Aug 93 01:46:58 -0700
Received: from goss.pyramid.com
	by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA02634; Fri, 6 Aug 93 01:46:56 -0700
Received: from mail.Germany.EU.net 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA03035; Fri, 6 Aug 93 01:47:51 -0700
Received: by mail.Germany.EU.net(EUnetD-2.3.0.g) via EUnet
	id CE18360; Fri, 6 Aug 1993 10:43:37 +0200
Received: from wegy
	by scotty.waldorf-gmbh.de with SMTP (5.65b/GEN-1.0.10)
	via EUnet for unido
	id AA01467; Fri, 6 Aug 93 10:39:32 +0200
Received: from resi 
	by wegy.waldorf-gmbh.de with SMTP (5.61/GEN-1.0.7)
	via EUnet for scotty
	id AA09061; Fri, 6 Aug 93 10:40:34 +0200
From: Andreas Busse <andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 10:39:37 +0200
Message-Id: <9308060839.AA14797@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de>
Received: by resi.waldorf-gmbh.de (5.61/GEN-1.0.7)
	via EUnet for wegy.waldorf-gmbh.de
	id AA14797; Fri, 6 Aug 93 10:39:37 +0200
To: riscy@pyramid.com
Subject: Re:  Decision
Sender: owner-riscy@pyramid.com
Reply-To: riscy@pyramid.com


> IMHO we should build the ARC 100 mips 4000 PC or IDT orion.

That's what I think too.

> But then again I, as a software person,  have nothing to offer the hardware 
> project in the way of expertise/services. 

In case we can get that ARC design, we hopefully don't need that much
expertise and service.

> I think those that do should make a decision and go for it.  Make a decision
> and see how many of us will follow.   That means you Andy, and Neil.

It's not that simple. Waldorf is not interested to produce a board
which nobody will buy. Waldorf is not a computer manufacturer. We would
produce the riscy-board only if we see a chance that there will be a user
base large enough to support Linux for Mips. More exactly spoken:
Waldorf would produce the board to force a Linux port, not to make money.
That means that we can't decide to use a R4400/75Mhz only because it's
nice and fast. We would rather use a R4200 *although* it's not that fast
but will be accepted by the riscy group because it's cheap enough.

> Each of us has there own agenda, the design by committee doesn't seem to be
> working particlarly well.

That's unfortunally true. So I make a suggestion:

1. We skip all R3x00 solutions. No matter how good, they will be
   obsolete by end of the year.

2. We should verify the NEC ARCset solution. If everything is fine
   and it isn't vaporware, it should be our choice.
   Verifying the ARCset means:
   - get *official* statements about price and availability
   - analyze it
   - buy it

3. We can then decide which CPU to use. Either NEC R4200 or
   IDT Orion. This depends on the price/power relations as
   well as on the availability. 

4. If 2. fails for whatever reasons, we have to wait.
   I'm absolutely sure that there *will* be solutions
   around the various R4x00 CPUs. If not now, then later.
   I'm sure because of the growing Windows NT market.

Can we go this way ?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Waldorf Electronics GmbH        | Phone:  +49 (0)2636-80294
              R&D Department            | Fax:    +49 (0)2636-80188
Neustrasse 9-12, 53498 Waldorf, Germany | email:  andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
From owner-riscy@pyramid.com  Fri Aug  6 05:45:06 1993
Received: from gossip.pyramid.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (4.1/tas-gen/1-30-93)
	id AA13915; Fri, 6 Aug 93 05:45:06 EDT
Received: from sword.eng.pyramid.com 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA07720; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:45:07 -0700
Received: by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA07280; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:43:56 -0700
Received: from goss.pyramid.com
	by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA07273; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:43:53 -0700
Received: from boulder.Colorado.EDU 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA07710; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:44:50 -0700
Received: from agua.Colorado.EDU by boulder.Colorado.EDU with SMTP id AA03044
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <riscy@pyramid.com>); Fri, 6 Aug 1993 03:42:35 -0600
Received: by agua.colorado.edu (cu.generic.890828)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 03:40:13 MDT
From: Alan Krantz <atk@agua.Colorado.EDU>
Message-Id: <9308060940.AA01976@agua.colorado.edu>
To: riscy@pyramid.com
Subject: Re:  Decision
Sender: owner-riscy@pyramid.com
Reply-To: riscy@pyramid.com

  From owner-riscy@pyramid.com Fri Aug  6 02:45:17 1993
  Subject: Re:  Decision


  3. We can then decide which CPU to use. Either NEC R4200 or
     IDT Orion. This depends on the price/power relations as
     well as on the availability. 

How does the performance/price of the Orion compare to the R4200?
As I understand it if you go with the IDT then people who wish to spend
more can go with the R4000pc (i.,e they are pin compat). While personally
I find the R4200 to have a very  attractive price/performance we might
want to consider the above. (Of course it's likely a R4200 pin compat chip 
with hardware fpu will be avail. in the future).

atk

 
From owner-riscy@pyramid.com  Fri Aug  6 05:50:46 1993
Received: from gossip.pyramid.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (4.1/tas-gen/1-30-93)
	id AA14038; Fri, 6 Aug 93 05:50:46 EDT
Received: from sword.eng.pyramid.com 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA08045; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:50:40 -0700
Received: by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA07619; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:49:34 -0700
Received: from goss.pyramid.com
	by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA07612; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:49:31 -0700
Received: from kinglear.cs.colorado.edu 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA08035; Fri, 6 Aug 93 02:50:28 -0700
Received: from localhost by kinglear.cs.Colorado.EDU with SMTP id AA15429
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <riscy@pyramid.com>); Fri, 6 Aug 1993 03:49:26 -0600
Message-Id: <199308060949.AA15429@kinglear.cs.Colorado.EDU>
To: riscy@pyramid.com
Subject: Re: Decision 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Aug 1993 10:39:37 +0200."
             <9308060839.AA14797@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de> 
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1993 03:49:25 -0600
From: Drew Eckhardt <drew@kinglear.cs.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: owner-riscy@pyramid.com
Reply-To: riscy@pyramid.com


    1. We skip all R3x00 solutions. No matter how good, they will be
       obsolete by end of the year.

Agreed, especially given the technical issues (we probably have 
a suitable, integrated 4000 series chipset now, the same thing for
the 3051 family isn't shipping), performance inssues, and pricing
although this hasn't been formally verified.
    
    2. We should verify the NEC ARCset solution. If everything is fine
       and it isn't vaporware, it should be our choice.
       Verifying the ARCset means:
       - get *official* statements about price and availability
       - analyze it
       - buy it

IMHO, this is the most viable solution that we've seen that's actually
shipping.
    
    3. We can then decide which CPU to use. Either NEC R4200 or
       IDT Orion. This depends on the price/power relations as
       well as on the availability. 

Agreed, the -design- will be essentially the same for the 
4200 and 4000PC/Orion (when available).

    4. If 2. fails for whatever reasons, we have to wait.
       I'm absolutely sure that there *will* be solutions
       around the various R4x00 CPUs. If not now, then later.
       I'm sure because of the growing Windows NT market.

Agreed, doing all of the support stuff ourselves would be too 
sloppy and the only other chips we've seen are 3051 family and 
either not shipping or unsuitable.
    
    Can we go this way ?

IMHO, definately.
    
 
From owner-riscy@pyramid.com  Fri Aug  6 11:14:06 1993
Received: from gossip.pyramid.com by SunSITE.unc.edu (4.1/tas-gen/1-30-93)
	id AA25786; Fri, 6 Aug 93 11:14:06 EDT
Received: from sword.eng.pyramid.com 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA04477; Fri, 6 Aug 93 08:14:01 -0700
Received: by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA20905; Fri, 6 Aug 93 08:12:31 -0700
Received: from goss.pyramid.com
	by sword.eng.pyramid.com (5.61/Pyramid_Internal_Configuration)
	id AA20898; Fri, 6 Aug 93 08:12:29 -0700
Received: from mail.Germany.EU.net 
	by gossip.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx5.1a Pyramid-Internet-Gateway)
	id AA04465; Fri, 6 Aug 93 08:13:22 -0700
Received: by mail.Germany.EU.net(EUnetD-2.3.0.g) via EUnet
	id CP06856; Fri, 6 Aug 1993 17:09:07 +0200
Received: from wegy
	by scotty.waldorf-gmbh.de with SMTP (5.65b/GEN-1.0.10)
	via EUnet for unido
	id AA03582; Fri, 6 Aug 93 17:05:58 +0200
Received: from resi 
	by wegy.waldorf-gmbh.de with SMTP (5.61/GEN-1.0.7)
	via EUnet for scotty
	id AA11279; Fri, 6 Aug 93 17:05:55 +0200
From: Andreas Busse <andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 17:04:58 +0200
Message-Id: <9308061504.AA16039@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de>
Received: by resi.waldorf-gmbh.de (5.61/GEN-1.0.7)
	via EUnet for wegy.waldorf-gmbh.de
	id AA16039; Fri, 6 Aug 93 17:04:58 +0200
To: riscy@pyramid.com
Subject: Re:  Decision
Sender: owner-riscy@pyramid.com
Reply-To: riscy@pyramid.com

>  3. We can then decide which CPU to use. Either NEC R4200 or
>     IDT Orion. This depends on the price/power relations as
>     well as on the availability. 
>
> How does the performance/price of the Orion compare to the R4200?
> As I understand it if you go with the IDT then people who wish to spend
> more can go with the R4000pc (i.,e they are pin compat). While personally
> I find the R4200 to have a very  attractive price/performance we might
> want to consider the above. (Of course it's likely a R4200 pin compat chip 
> with hardware fpu will be avail. in the future).

Yes, the Orion will be pin-compatible with the R4000PC and the R4400PC. 
Price/power relation means "how many specmark per dollar" too,
but the migration path is more important, I believe.
In case the Orion is available in near future, what we have to find
out, and it's not much more expensive than the R4200, then it might
be a better choice.
The most important thing is availability. The Orion is surely a very
interesting thing, but I would take the CPU which I can *really* buy
when I need it.

Andy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Waldorf Electronics GmbH        | Phone:  +49 (0)2636-80294
              R&D Department            | Fax:    +49 (0)2636-80188
Neustrasse 9-12, 53498 Waldorf, Germany | email:  andy@resi.waldorf-gmbh.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
