Subject: Did we do all wrong ;-?

From: [email-masked] ( )
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 93 04:46:57 -0400

Liqun,
        I just figure that probably we did all wrong in the last conference
for the HQ financial budget.

        For the financial budget proposed by HQ, we have 3 choice.
1. pass the whole package
2. reject the whole package
3. suggest HQ do some modification and we review it later.

Because the proposal should be the negotiating result between HQ and council,
we can only pass it or reject it, unless HQ want us to pass part of it.
Because by HQ's consideration, when they make change to one part, they may 
want change other part also to balance the whole thing.

This certainly implies the finance committee should negotiate with HQ to get
a satisfy result before it even present to the council, or we have to 
negotiate with HQ in the conference, which certainly is waste of time and
money.

Also, since the plan is not a resolution, 2/3 pass may not required. I am
not sure what's the vote result we need to pass it.

Why don't you check rules and some veteran to see what exactly we need to do 
here. The same thing apply to personal appointment.

_________________________(301)405-5025(office) (301)314-9437(fax)  _  /|
Dong Chen                 [email-masked]  (Express Mail)     \'o.O` 
Lab. for Plasma Research  [email-masked]     (Standard Mail)    =(___)=
University of Maryland                      "It's UNIX"              U   
College Park, MD20742, USA (Snail Mail)            -- Jurrasic Park