From wangy@rintintin.Colorado.EDU  Thu Apr 14 10:51:43 1994
Return-Path: <wangy@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>
Received: from rintintin.Colorado.EDU by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA08084; Thu, 14 Apr 94 10:51:43 CDT
Received: (from wangy@localhost) by rintintin.Colorado.EDU (8.6.8.1/8.6.6/CNS-3.5) id JAA07478 for council-wn@ifcss.org; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 09:49:39 -0600
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 09:49:39 -0600
From: WANG  YU RAYMOND <wangy@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>
Message-Id: <199404141549.JAA07478@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>
To: council-wn@ifcss.org
Status: RO


I am here.
New #: 303-786-1780(h), 303-497-1563(w).
I prefer Cal State Haywood.

From liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu  Thu Apr 14 16:15:27 1994
Return-Path: <liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu>
Received: from wadsworth.ph.albany.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA19638; Thu, 14 Apr 94 16:15:27 CDT
Received: from violet (violet.ph.albany.edu) by wadsworth.ph.albany.edu (4.1/SMI-3.2)
	id <AA09042@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu>; Thu, 14 Apr 94 17:13:32 EDT
From: liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu (Cheng Liu)
Received: by violet 
        (920330.SGI//ident-1.0) id AA22832; Thu, 14 Apr 94 17:13:41 -0400 
Message-Id: <9404142113.AA22832@violet>
Subject: E-mail conference
To: council-wn@ifcss.org
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 17:13:41 -0500 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 219       
Status: RO

	Meeting chair:

	I will be present on net during the second E-mail conference, 6
pm, April 16, 1994.
	I approve the proposed meeting orders and rules.


               Cheng Liu (Signed)
               April 14, 1994 


From liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu  Fri Apr 15 11:51:54 1994
Return-Path: <liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu>
Received: from wadsworth.ph.albany.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA24188; Fri, 15 Apr 94 11:51:54 CDT
Received: from violet (violet.ph.albany.edu) by wadsworth.ph.albany.edu (4.1/SMI-3.2)
	id <AA17214@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu>; Fri, 15 Apr 94 12:49:54 EDT
From: liuc@wadsworth.ph.albany.edu (Cheng Liu)
Received: by violet 
        (920330.SGI//ident-1.0) id AA04796; Fri, 15 Apr 94 12:50:04 -0400 
Message-Id: <9404151650.AA04796@violet>
Subject: Site for 6da
To: council-wn@ifcss.org
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1994 12:50:03 -0500 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1091      
Status: RO

	Dear Dong Chen:
	I received you message on my answer machine. Among the applications
for hosting 6da, I think Madison should be our first choice. Because it
is at the center, so it is more convenient for people to attend. More
importantly this is not a resort like the Bay area in SF is, so delegte
will more likely to concentrate on the meeting rather than sight seeing.
	I talked with Zhengdong, my impression is that they are very
confident about what they are doing. And Madison is a region that IFCSS
has a deep root. And I know that significant number of council members are
favoring it over other universities. 
	Please inform Zhengdong as soon as possible to reserve domotories.
If you think otherwise, or the opinion that you collected proved otherwise,
please post the message that you received on the net plus explanations.
Because as you said there will not have enough time for a vote, if any
difference in opinion exist, we better do as much work as possible, so we
would not get into trouble again. Best wishes.


                                                 Cheng Liu  


From DING@vaxld.ameslab.gov  Thu Apr 14 09:34:36 1994
Return-Path: <DING@vaxld.ameslab.gov>
Received: from vaxld.ameslab.gov by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA05038; Thu, 14 Apr 94 09:34:36 CDT
Received: from alisuvax.bitnet by alisuvax.bitnet (PMDF V4.2-14 #5825) id
 <01HB5SA5CRCQ4DDFYY@alisuvax.bitnet>; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 09:32:46 CDT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 09:32:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: DING@vaxld.ameslab.gov
Subject: Re: What's your idea about 6da's  site ?
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Message-Id: <01HB5SA5CRCS4DDFYY@alisuvax.bitnet>
X-Vms-To: IN%"council-l@ifcss.org"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Status: RO


Since our email conference is yet to start (and a decision on the 6th Congress
site will be made then), and the issue is urgent as Chen Dong pointed out,
I suggest the following:

1.  Council members, please voice our your choice/concern/comment now
    for the Council to get a rough idea of the consent.

2.  We'll explore the possibility of postponing the deadline of making
    reservations with the bidding schools.


A formal call of the email conference will be sent out by me and Chen Dong
soon.



Yungui



From songlin@buphy.bu.edu  Thu Apr 14 09:37:00 1994
Return-Path: <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Received: from buphy.bu.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA05114; Thu, 14 Apr 94 09:37:00 CDT
Received: (songlin@localhost) by buphy.bu.edu (8.6.8/8.6.4) id OAA06907 for council-l@ifcss.org; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 14:35:07 GMT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 14:35:07 GMT
From: Songlin Ren <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Message-Id: <199404141435.OAA06907@buphy.bu.edu>
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Subject: Re:  What's your idea about 6da's  site ?
Status: RO

I prefer San Fancisco CA. 1da, 2da, 4da and 5da were in midwest, and 3da were i
in DC (east). This time should be in west. San Fancisco have a big airport,
the tiket may be lower. 

Songlin

From songlin@buphy.bu.edu  Thu Apr 14 10:00:14 1994
Return-Path: <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Received: from buphy.bu.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA05931; Thu, 14 Apr 94 10:00:14 CDT
Received: (songlin@localhost) by buphy.bu.edu (8.6.8/8.6.4) id OAA08032 for council-l@ifcss.org; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 14:58:21 GMT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 14:58:21 GMT
From: Songlin Ren <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Message-Id: <199404141458.OAA08032@buphy.bu.edu>
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Subject: Re: What's your idea about 6da's  site ?
Status: RO

The bay area of San Fransico is good place for 6da. Many schools in that area,
UC Berkeley, Stanford, UC San Francisco, San Fransico State U. and so on.
Also, there are very strong chinese community. The term to support 6da will
be very strong. The air tiket will be much lower than Madison. Madison
doesn't have big airport. Some of airline will only reach to Milwaukee, it
is not very convenient. The important thing is that IFCSS congress have
4 times in midwest, but never in west.

Songlin

From songlin@buphy.bu.edu  Thu Apr 14 10:21:13 1994
Return-Path: <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Received: from buphy.bu.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA06686; Thu, 14 Apr 94 10:21:13 CDT
Received: (songlin@localhost) by buphy.bu.edu (8.6.8/8.6.4) id PAA08943 for council-l@ifcss.org; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 15:19:17 GMT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 15:19:17 GMT
From: Songlin Ren <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Message-Id: <199404141519.PAA08943@buphy.bu.edu>
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Subject: Re:  Liu Cheng's report on MFN survey result (re-post as requested)
Status: RO

The issue of relation of US and China is very important, we should have a
discussion section of it in 6da. The MFN survey result is not an accurate
measuerment of the views of CCS. We don't how many % of CSS is on the
net. 

Songlin

From songlin@buphy.bu.edu  Thu Apr 14 11:50:39 1994
Return-Path: <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Received: from buphy.bu.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA10006; Thu, 14 Apr 94 11:50:39 CDT
Received: (songlin@localhost) by buphy.bu.edu (8.6.8/8.6.4) id QAA12651 for council-l@ifcss.org; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 16:48:47 GMT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 16:48:47 GMT
From: Songlin Ren <songlin@buphy.bu.edu>
Message-Id: <199404141648.QAA12651@buphy.bu.edu>
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Subject: E-mail Conference
Status: RO


.......................................................................
   Meeting Chair,

   I will be in presence for the Council First E-mail Conference starting
   5pm CST (6pm EST), Saturday, April 16, 1994, in the council email
   network.

   I approve (or disapprove) the proposed conference schedule, order
   and rules.

   Songlin Ren (signed)
   Member of IFCSS 5th Council
   Representing Region: NE 
 .......................................................................


From ejwang@titan.ucs.umass.edu  Thu Apr 14 12:03:33 1994
Return-Path: <ejwang@titan.ucs.umass.edu>
Received: from pobox.ucs.umass.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA10382; Thu, 14 Apr 94 12:03:33 CDT
Received: from twain.ucs.umass.edu by pobox.ucs.umass.edu (PMDF V4.2-14 #2573)
 id <01HB5YQQSNRK008Q82@pobox.ucs.umass.edu>; Thu, 14 Apr 1994 12:34:00 -0400
Received: from localhost (ejwang@localhost) by twain.ucs.umass.edu
 (8.6.4/8.6.4) id MAA15601 for council-l@ifcss.org; Thu,
 14 Apr 1994 12:34:00 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1994 12:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: ECHO WANG <ejwang@titan.ucs.umass.edu>
Subject: 6da site
To: council-l@ifcss.org
Message-Id: <199404141634.MAA15601@twain.ucs.umass.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 579
Status: RO

Chen Dong,

	Thanks for taking the responsibility.  Among the three candidate sites:

> 1. University of Wisconsin-Madison,
> 2. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill,
> 3. California State University-Hayward.

	For now, I prefer 3. CSU.  

	But if time ever allows, I'd suggest that both HQ and the Council   
should do some more research, like checking the airfare from each of the 
region and get some more details from each of the site candidate.  Might 
not sound practical when quick decision is needed.  We can probably do 
this for the upcoming e-mail mtg.

Wang Jing



