From dlq@u.washington.edu  Mon Jan 10 19:21:48 1994
Return-Path: <dlq@u.washington.edu>
Received: from carson.u.washington.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA02369; Mon, 10 Jan 94 19:21:48 CST
Received: by carson.u.washington.edu
	(5.65/UW-NDC Revision: 2.29 ) id AA04907; Mon, 10 Jan 94 17:20:07 -0800
X-Sender: dlq@carson.u.washington.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 1994 17:20:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Liqun Dong <dlq@u.washington.edu>
Subject: 
To: IFCSS Council <council-wn@ifcss.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9401101735.A28265-0100000@carson.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO

All of our council colleagues:

After the Finance Committee released the open letter, a fierce dispute 
has been aroused among the CSSs and many of our council members, SVCs and 
others. And I've received my calls and e-mails in just two days. Here I 
don't want to blame anyone for the releasement and to give my personal 
comment on the content and the possible consequence of the open letter at 
that moment. The only thing I want to remind all of our colleagues is 
that any subcommittee should not issue any formal announcement to the 
public, especially for such a sensitive topic. And I'd like to ask our 
finance committee to keep silent and hold your oppinions until the 
proposed round table meeting (or working meeting) in the beginning of 
February. We should follow the rules and regulations of IFCSS 
Constitution and Council's Bylaws, even though some of these seem not 
reasonable for you. 


Liqun  Dong



From zhan0002@gold.tc.umn.edu  Tue Jan 11 15:44:04 1994
Return-Path: <zhan0002@gold.tc.umn.edu>
Received: from gold.tc.umn.edu (gold1.tc.umn.edu) by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA11507; Tue, 11 Jan 94 15:44:04 CST
Received: by gold.tc.umn.edu; Tue, 11 Jan 94 15:42:29 -0600
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 1994 15:41:14 -0600 (CST)
From: Feng Zhang-1 <zhan0002@gold.tc.umn.edu>
Subject: 
To: Council-wn@ifcss.org
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9401111514.A3732-7100000@gold.tc.umn.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO

I am wondering how many people in council are going to DC for meeting. I
have got the ticket already.

Zhang Feng



From bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu  Thu Jan 13 15:55:16 1994
Return-Path: <bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Received: from rand.cc.rochester.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA02380; Thu, 13 Jan 94 15:55:16 CST
Received: by rand.cc.rochester.edu (5.57/1.16) id AA08299; Thu, 13 Jan 94 17:08:59 EST
Subject:  
To: council-wn@ifcss.org
From: Bing Qi <bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 94 16:59:14 -0500
Message-Id: <940113.165914.6563@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Status: RO

For the tele-conference I'll be home around 6pm. 716-2920033.

From bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu  Sun Jan 16 14:20:34 1994
Return-Path: <bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Received: from rand.cc.rochester.edu by ifcss.org (4.1/IFCSS-Mailer)
	id AA26155; Sun, 16 Jan 94 14:20:34 CST
Received: by rand.cc.rochester.edu (5.57/1.16) id AA23588; Sun, 16 Jan 94 15:34:22 EST
Subject:  
To: council-wn@ifcss.org
From: Bing Qi <bgqi@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 94 15:24:34 -0500
Message-Id: <940116.152434.6682@medinfo.rochester.edu>
Status: RO


Dear council members:


I totally agree with Liu Chen's letter about the selection of CPA recompilation. 
What he's written out is just the same experience and suspicion I've been 
undergoing at the inspection in D.C.and afterwards. I'd like to bring your 
attention to following two points which I want to emphasize:

1/ What the HQ is bidding for is a CPA to redo (!) what HQ treasurer should have  
   done as his or her job, which we pay $12,000 each year.  This is only the 
   first for a good accounting. We are still away from CPA-auditing.
   
2/ As Liu Chen said in the letter, we are not choosing somebody to cover up or 
   make up. We just don't want the accounting of IFCSS the same messy and 
   questionable as before!  What we want to stuggle for is a more professionized 
   and therefore better IFCSS, instead of saving the old habit of keeping 
   everything in the dark to the public, just as  what we've been coming to the 
   US for is to learn how a system works instead of warming up dirty political 
   tricks for the next generation China.
   
Thank you!

																																																Qi, Bing

