Subject: A suggestion from a netter

From: Mi Mi <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 93 23:43:58 EDT

=====================================================
== The following are packed information on         ==
== Special Report  infor from  LAD-network         ==
== ADDRESS correspondences to the ORIGINAL SENDER  ==
== To sign on/off, mail to "[email-masked]"    ==
== To post,        mail to "[email-masked]" ==
=====================================================
== lads-net committee is a group of volunteers     ==
== who have lads just like you. If you have any    ==
== suggestions, criticisms, comments and concerns, ==
== please let us know. If you want to join us to   ==
== serve the lads-community, you are highly        ==
== encouraged to do so. Mi Mi.                     ==
=====================================================
Return-Path: <@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:[email-masked]>
Received: from CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
          (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0410; Sat, 14 Aug 1993 23:13:38 -0400
Date:         Sat, 14 Aug 1993 22:13:13 CDT
Reply-To:     [email-masked]
Sender:       Newsletter on Chinese Community <[email-masked]>
>From:         [email-masked]
Subject:      Forwarded note below
To:           Multiple recipients of list CCNL <[email-masked]>

=======================================================================
======================================================================== 29
Date:         Sat, 14 Aug 93 21:18:53 CDT
>From:         U42212@UICVM
Subject:      Suggestion
To:           [email-masked]

I would like to put in my 2 cents:
As I understand, American Lawyer Association ( maybe other name ) objected
CSPA at that time  we were labbing. But later on, ALA does not object it
strongly. May ALA realized they do not lose many chances of business since
we just use 300 from china quota.( They do not get other 700 if we do not
use it). That a lot of chinese turn to CSPA does not   mean there is a
 lack of chinces using china quato. The business from china quota still
  is there for them. But there is a lack of people using world quota.
   If we had not used world quato left this year, they still could not
    make money from this leftover quato.

ALA never help us in pushing CSPA. Right now ALA jumped in pushing INS to
let illigal-entering chinese qualified for CSPA. ( I do not object it at
 all). These chinese have to turn to their help. This is a motivation of
  ALA, I guess.

I got a suggestion here. We may turn to ALA for help. If Later-Arriving
-Dependents have to use china quato, most of us do not need any help from
lawyers. We use china quato. It definitely means they lose business.
 But if we can use world quato which can not be used up each year, it
  will befenit both us ( LADs & LCs ) and lawyers. So, ALA may be glad
   to help us, not just us.

We need  a stratagy to push ALA and let ALA push INS. We also need to
let ALA know this fact that they lose money if LADs use china quato.