Subject: random thoughts

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 93 17:26:22 CDT

Hi:
  I have seen several messages recently regarding the lads issues
ignored by the IFCSS, presumably due to the objections of LC committee
members.  We will agree with the argument that that attitude will hurt
LCs more than Lads as they will compete for visa numbers in the same
category in the near future.  We should also bear in mind that there is
no great incentive for the LC committee members in the IFCSS or the
general LCs to lobby for lads world-wide-quote affairs.  Most LCs are
busy studying and have not realized the reality of visa problems except
those who are looking for jobs.
  I also want to mention that several messages carry an anti-undocumented-
Chinese feeling because they will have more lads.  As IFCSS argued in one
message that if the US goverment wants to legelize the Chinese students, 
no one can stop the action; the same is true with the undocumented Chinese.
INS has sent the cable that an undocumented Chinese will be eligible for
CSPA benefit if he or she reenters with an inspection.  Many of Chinese
cannot accept the fact those less educated Chinese also has a chance to
immigrate into the great American society, because of their vanity.  This
is another example of "Wu Shi Bu Xiao Bai Bu".  CSPA principals are
classified as EB-3, not EB-1 or EB-2, because as a whole it is not
considered to extraordinary professionals or special skilled professionals.
Remember, we are just skilled workers.
  We with lads are neglected as our number is small.  I agree that we
should push the move to put MI MI in the IFCSS, but we should also support
the move that undocumented CSPA people to benefit from CSPA because:
This is humanitarian.  This will increase the number of lads.  This will
create a great incentive for LCs to lobby for lads.  This will not hurt
those LC who has the potential to be "extraordinary" and "special" to 
benefit from EB-1 and EB-2, a category I used to consider myself in.