Subject: [[email-masked]: Re: Mi Mi fired the third round petition letter!]

From: [email-masked] (Mi Mi)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 93 12:11:36 CDT

Date: 04 Oct 93 13:06:13 EDT
>From: [email-masked] (Donglin Mi)
Subject: Re: Mi Mi fired the third round petition letter!
To: [email-masked]

--- You wrote:

Hi, Zuojun Cao:

Recruiting LC was the first thought of our committee. But, the LC-L survey 
shows the support to our lads-net's petition letter is only 31%, much less
than the percentage who support lobbying an unconditional PR for every 
LC, and those who support lobbying an unconditional work permit for every
LC. Even with presummed 100% support from lads-net, we only got 600 or 
less signatures out of the pool of over 1000 subscribers (many co-signers
are really dependents rather than subscribers). Remember this number also
includes some LC, since we have posted to CND-US, Social.culture.china,
talk.politics.china (?), ccnl, China-Nt, lc-l (by lc-l working committee) 
many times, at least 10 days to all the public posting addresses and some
I have the posting previliges. Huge amount of privat e-mail messages were
addressed to individuals to get their support. If Clinton had to do this 
and achieve what we had, he had better to set up his own Law Office.

This petition drive has reached its limit already. For those who support
us, we express here our sincerely thanks. For those onlookers, well, 
please remember IT IS YOUR PROBLEM, if you do not do it, or even do not
support those who are doing it for you, than everything has a limit. There
have been too many free lunches. 

Mi Mi 

--- end of quoted material ---

Hi, Mi Mi:

I think that it is time that we are lobbying our CSPA principals arround our
local area to support our petition. There are at least about 30,000 people
among all of CSPA principals in the universities or colleges. If we  get one
third of them, we can have 10,000 signatures. I think that it is a low-cost,
high-efficient campaign.
 
Donglin Mi