[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hidden cameras to catch speeders
rlooney@csc.com (Richard Looney) wrote:
>Photo radar is being used not to supplement the observations of an
officer,
>but to REPLACE an officer. You are being accused and convicted by a
machine
>and there is nothing you can do about it. That is WRONG. Surveillance
used
>without just cause for suspicion is a tool of oppression.
This really isn't a case of "surveillance used without just cause" at all;
from what I understand of the systems, a sensor of some sort detects a
violation, which at that point activates the camera and records the image.
The sensor's detection, in essence, is the "just cause" that activates
the surveillance. I know this is how the systems set up to detect
red-light runners are set up, and am fairly certian the speeding systems
work the same way. While a sensor may activate in error, so too can real
live police officers make a mistake.
Also, it is specious to argue that "You are being accused and convicted by
a machine and there is nothing you can do about it." All avenues
available to you had the violation been detected by an officer are still
available; you can contest the citation and appear before a judge or
magistate, etc. Theoretically, you could appeal the conviction all the
way to the Supreme Court if you had a valid avenue of appeal. The fact
that the evidence is strong and makes it hard to contest a citation does
not mean that you are being denied your constitutional rights, and
certianly does not constitute a "tool of oppression" (at least among the
non-paranoid).
S. Pierre Paret
Washington, D.C. "Through Reason, or By Force."
spierre@aol.com
Follow-Ups:
References: