From: Jayasree Saranathan <jayasree.saranathan@...>
Date: Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:50 pm
Subject: Re: Is she capable - continuation 3
In Smt. Jayasree's mail I am adding my comments. Dhasan M.G.Vasudevan.
JS is Smt. Jayasree
MGV is myself.
JS: Respected Swamin, My humble pranams to you. Kindly pardon me for making an
interruption in this wonderful write-up you have been giving from time to time.
In my opinion some amount of psychological empathy goes into understanding why
Rama was on meager diet and why Sita thought of His condition as giving her
both amrutham and poison.
MGV: Thank you, madam, for your mail. Interruptions and comments are always
welcome from all. That too from such a knowledgeable, serial and serious writer
in and as JS is 'at once' welcomed.
'From time to time' - please excuse me for that - for I am in service and have
official and other commitments.
Besides some amount of knowledge deficiency is also there, which has to be
overcome from supplement sources of knowledge. This is done by me in the form
of a discussion with a colleague, with whom every topic, I write, is discussed
in detail [particularly on sreemadh raamaayaNam].
JS: First of all, the dhukkam that both Rama and Sita were undergoing is
something unparalleled. Even on reading about it, people like us are not able
to eat or remain calm. Hey SithE, unaaku inda dhukkamaa?
Hey Raama, unakku kooda dhukkamaa?
We also empathise with Hanuman, "Alas, can I ever get to see Sita?"
We catch Sita's emotions, "Hey SeethE podum podum, innum dhukka-p-paddathE"
We feel like telling, "Hey Hanuman, oru kai paarthudum."
MGV: these all show the capacity of sage vaalmeeki - the aadhi kavi - the first
poet - to make the reader - even a casual one like MGV to get fascinated with
his simple and lucid presentation. Then become a serious one like JS - then to
get emotionally involved with the characters of the epic.
JS: But thinking of Raama, I have this complaint against Valmiki. When he went
into details about all the sufferings, when he went on to say how the vanaras
celebrated the good news of having found out Sita, why was he with such paucity
of words to express some goodness felt by Raama on receiving the news?
MGV: the hero if he reacts with high emotion such as happiness when the
servants are enjoying on account of the hero, in my opinion, then the rasa
anubhavam of enjoyment of the servants gets diminished. For a good father the
children's pleasure is his pleasure.
That is why perhaps vaalmeeki underplayed that aanandham of raama. Also as
naaradha says, not once but twice, 'raama does not show his emotions so easily
and highly'. See both slokams in the very first sargam of baala kaaNdam.
ikshvaaku vamsa prabhavO raamO naama janai: srutha: |
niyatha aathmaa mahaaveeryO dhyuthimaan dhruthimaan vasee || 1-1-8
meaning: "One emerged from Ikshvaku dynasty and known to people as Rama by his
name, and he is conscientious, highly valorous, resplendent, steadfast and a
controller of vice and vile, and his own senses, as well.
Dharmajna: sathya sandha: cha prajaanaam cha hithE ratha: |
yasasvee jnaana sampanna: suchi: vasya: samaadhimaan || 1-1-12
meaning: "He is the knower of rectitude, bidden by the truth, also his concern
is in the welfare of subjects, proficient in prudence, clean in his conduct,
self-controlled and a diligent one, thus he is glorious.
This word vasee and vasya denotes the controlling of senses. 'Senses' is a
complete word, and exhibiting aanandham or pleasure is part of that.
JS: There is just the information about goose pimples experienced by Raama and
Lakshmana on hearing from Shugreeva that there is some good news about Sita. It
is because of the fact that Rama was not happy except for having found her
whereabouts. Because the dhukkam was of such high magnitude. The dhukkam was of
such high magnitude, that Raama, Lakshmana and Sita could not have remained
calm or caring for their body on those occasions.
MGV: replied as above.
JS: Then where comes even the thought of using the mantras Bhala and Ati bhala?
What they needed were sedatives and not mantras for keeping awake or
appetite-free! And Sita could have never thought of even a sedative (if offered
as we wish) for who knows what kind of danger would come to her from Ravana, if
she is asleep or loses her conscious vigilance even for a second. Recall the
way the kavi describes how she shrank herself physically, when Ravana visited
her in the late hours of night. And didn't Rama know of this danger to Sita?
How could he have slept or eaten anything when he was under constant worry
about Sita and her safety? Anybody undergoing that dhukkam would have been so
without any aid of bhala or ati bhala.
MGV: Since thee is no evidence from vaalmeeki whether the manthraas are used or
not, we cannot conclude that it was not used. Further anybody undergoing a
suffering would seek some remedy - for certain people by weeping, for certain
by walking some distance, for certain people changing the place, for certain
others some meditation etc. May be for raama that came from bala and athibala.
We must give the benefit of doubt to the beneficiary of the manthra and not
rule out that since kavi has not expressed that openly.
JS: Also these mantras were taught to Raama and Lakshmana by the sage at a time
when they were required to keep round the clock vigil over the yajnas that the
sages in the forest were doing and they as very young princes who have until
then had grown in the luxuries of princely life would not have got used to
keeping awake and even going without food for days in their vigil over the
yajnas. Certainly those mantras would in no way be in the thought of Raama
while in search of Sita, and whatever he ate was the basic minimum required to
keep him alive and strong enough, because he had that formidable task of
looking for Sita and vanquishing the one who had abducted his dear wife.
MGV: 'whatever given like the bala and athibala are not sufficient. Hey sage
visvaamithra give more to raama' was the comment of indhra made just after
raama killed thaataka. So sage also gave all sasthraas and asthraas, later
paved way for getting seethaa also. Shall we call this also a gift from
visvaamithra?
When raama has used later all the asthraas, sasthraas and seethaa also - just
recall seethaa saying for 12 years we enjoyed all materialistic life before
raama was called upon to be coronated, - is there no chance that he would not
use these two manthraas.
JS: In this context the comparison with "what is great in Bheeshma?" looks out
of place.
MGV: it is just a point just came to mind, which I wanted to share with all,
and definitely not a comparison. If it is interpreted as a comparison then I am
sorry.
JS: Raama could have as well reached Lanka soon after the abduction, or could
have reached the parNashala in time to thwart Ranavana's efforts and killed him
then and there. But He had scripted the sequences in such a way that (it looks
that) He and Sita deliberately parted and suffered presumably to make room for
other players such as Shugreeva and Hanuman, other samhaarams such as Vali's
and establishment of Dharmas such as sharanagathi to Vibheeshana with Piratti
not being physically present, but by extending purushakaarathwam in absentia
(via hanuman). This purushakaarathwam of Sita is the interpretation I see for
the second part of your mail! She is one who is bearing the suffering on behalf
of all jivas, to drive home the point that come whatever may, bhagavan will not
leave us in the lurch, that bhagavan is indeed suffering more in His search for
the jivas He has lost in samsara. - Will she ever think that she is the one who
is really suffering with no armoury that Rama has?
MGV: 'purushakaarathwam'- etc are beyond my capacity to grasp and hence I offer
no point / comment.
JS: Likewise will she ever think that while she is suffering, what is so great
about Rama not eating or sleeping? She is one takes the sufferings of others
and suitably recommend to Him that they are indeed eligible for His kataaksham.
Can such a person ever think that she is suffering more and compare it with
Raama's? Even if she were to think about Rama's suffering, She would be
thinking of taking that suffering too for herself. That is the characteristic
of any Bharateeya naari. That is all the more true for a pati-vrathai. And that
is Absolute Truth for Piratti! She could not even stand the news of fire in
Hanuman's tail. She, who did not think of cleaning her body resorted to
cleaning by athma shuddhi before invoking Agni bhagavan not to burn Hanuman.
Can such a Sita ever think that it is a monkey statement and that Raama has
better armoury unlike her, to ward of hunger and sleep? Another dimension to
this is the supreme Trust between the couple in marriage, here the divine
couple. They know each other how the other would be in their absence. They
followed the acharam of each other in the absence of each other. Even if
Shugreeva has brought food and compelled Raama to eat, what would have Rama
told, "How can I eat this food when Sita wont be touching anything offered by
that abductor." Rama's constant bickering, asking even the trees and animals
whether they had seen Sita is to be seen that He could not think of anyone
other than Sita.
MGV: these all are high-class interpretations by JS. Similarly I also
interpreted that as monkey statement.
JS: But Sita did ask whether He was thinking about her. It was due to the delay
in Raama reaching to her. Coupled with it were all sorts of self-doubts about
herself. Such a Sita will be cursing herself or her fate more and more than
thinking that Rama is in a better position than hers. Even when she was
thinking that Rama might complete his vana vasam and go back to Ayodhya without
tracing her, she considered it as her Dhur-bhagyam and not find it as Rama
being better placed. That is about the way women think.
MGV: again a good defense lawyer's argument in support of her client.
JS: As such it is not a monkey statement. Monkey statement is something else -
which she says later when Hanuman declared that he can take her to Rama. There
again Hanuman was initially led to think that it is to do with his physical
prowess. But after Sita explained the intricacies in it, he realized the
un-tenability of his declaration or offer. Here it is amrutham visha
sampruktham.
MGV: since that comes later we cannot place the sentences of kavi to suit our
argument or convenience. Kavi has placed this amrutham visha sampruktham here.
JS: She receives the news that Raama is always thinking of her. It is amrutham
for that gives her tremendous strength to brave any kind of suffering. It is
visham, for he is suffering on account of her. This is unbearable to her, for
she can never have Rama suffer on any account particularly for her sake.
MGV: that is what is given in the first interpretation. Second is just a
different one given with main intention to introduce that such marvelous krithi
of thyaagaraaja.
JS: she, who entered agni for his sake and who took up life in exile as a
pregnant woman for the sake of his honour! There is no such scope here (in the
context under discussion) for her to do something to thwart his suffering. She
could have embraced death (which she seriously contemplated) but that would
bring dishonour to Him. She could have killed Ravana by herself or by power of
pati vratham. But that would bring dishonour to Him. She could have even
accepted Hanuman's offer of taking her back to Raama. But that would bring
dishonour to Him. All options available to her are tied to this dishonour
aspect to Rama. That is the crux of this entire issue!
MGV: as seethaa herself stated she did not have the mandate of raama to
eliminate raavaNa. It means that she is capable all the while but just
restrains herself for the sake of honour of her husband. That was the highlight
in the previous 8 [5 + 3] posts on this topic.
Further when raama was about to meet sage sarabhanga indhra was there waiting
to lead or take the rishi to nether world. Indhra said I do not want to talk to
raama now and till he finishes his avathaara kaaryam of elimination of such
evil forces like raavaNa so that it will show to the world who is raama, and
left the place without talking to raama. Seethaa, and lakshmaNa were also there
by the side of raama. When indhra sidetracked to meet raama, she would
definitely, have realized whose responsibility it is to do such kaaryam of
elimination.
Dhasan
Vasudevan m.g
DISCLAIMER:
This Message and its contents is intended solely for the addressee and is
proprietary.Information in this mail is for L&T Business Usage only. Any Use to
other than the addressee is misuse and infringement to Proprietorship of L&T
ECC.If you are not the addressee please return the mail to the sender.L&T ECC
DIVISION
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/XUWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |