You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - Feb 2006

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00086 Feb 2006

 
Feb 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Dear Sri MadhavakaNNan svAmi and Sri Balaji,

Here is yet another reason for sparing the life of mahabali.

dAsan
vanamamalai padmanabhan.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Padmanabhan 
To: ramanuja ; Oppiliappan ; vanamamalai ; divyadesams 
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: Magnanimity 5


thrivikramA towards mAvali

 A person gets property in possession of the other by  doing some con tricks. 
What happens/ The whole world abuses the trickster but never goes into the 
background. The fact that the possessor of the property is not the legal owner 
is never considered at all. The trickster is blamed. The giver to the trickster 
is left unassessed.

Here the trickster is none other than the Almighty and the tricked is 
'mahA-bali'

This is what poizhgai AzhwAr opines 'koNdAnai allAl koduthArai yAr pazhippAr?" 
mudhal thiruvandhAdhi 79;

What is the real background? one may ask. Well. As everyone would agree the two 
thathvam-s namely chith and achith are subservient to the third -Eswaran. This 
being so, mahA-bali overlooking the subservience of the worlds to the Lord 
started taking possession of the land and in the process made indhrA landless. 

The real snatcher of the property was thus was mahA-bali and not the other way 
round, as is perceived. What happens to a person who steals the property of the 
Almighty. He is bound to get death sentence. Did this happen?

No. Why? The Lord felt that since, this mahA-bali had a good attitude of giving 
to one and all, his life should be spared.
'vATTamilA vaN kai" says nam-AzhwAr in the thiruvoizmohi 7-5-6  ; The tireless 
giving arms is considered as the saving grace for otherwise he is posessed with 
egoism and egotism. Akin to rAvaNA who took away the property of perumAL, 
mahA-bali also took away the property. Hence, similar to rAvaNA he was also to 
have died.
This is what is mentioned in the Edu to the vyAkyAnam to the aformentioned 
pAsuram
" rAvaNAdhigaLai p pOle thalaiayai aRuthup pogadavoNNAmaikku 
nibandhanamuNdAgaiyAlEa, azhiyach seidhilan" 

Therefore, we should realise that though mahA-bali should also have attained 
death like rAvaNA, he was spared due to his 'audhArya'guNam 
which again highlights the Lord's
'audhAryam"

dAsan
vanamamalai padmanabhan


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/XUWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list