Dear SvAmi,
Till the explanations - Divyartha Dhepikai-s are along with the vyAkyanam-s
it is okay. Once it does not go along with the vyAkyAnam it is very
difficult to digest.
There is no doubt that Sri EmperumAnar wanted more VyAkyanam-s and emerged
the five great commentaries for 'TiruvAimozhi'.
The anubhavam-s should not stop definitley it should go on and that is what
we are having while interacting in the groups.
However, the limit is crossed when we transgress the original texts.
If we, for the sake of anubhavam interpret to our likings then it will lead
to chaos, as i would interpret to my liking and you to yours.
Therefore, it is always better to stick to the original version and keep
these explanations as guide.
As you would appreciate, guides cannot be substitues and dhivyartha
dhepikais cannot supersede the original vyAkyAnam.s
Neither you nor me can reduce the greatness of Svami Desikan.
Mentioning in Rahaysa thrayam as parrot is one thing, mentioning that AzvAr
pays obesience to Svami Desikan is another. Is it not? Is UthamUr svAmi
actually menitoning that AzvAr is paying obesience to svAmi Desikan? pls.
clarify.
It is better always to refer to orignal vyAkyanam-s also while following
these dhepikai-s. It will avaoid all such confusion.
Further, skipping on selective basis just bacause it is given by UthamUr
svami will not be in good taste. Please understand that i am not against
UthamUr svamy, if that is what you mean by skipping .However at the same
time, let us understand that once these things come in groups, this comes
into public glare and therfore will attract queires.
If still you want me to skip reading these, please unsubscribe me from the
group.
dasan
vanamamalai padmanabhan
----- Original Message -----
From: "balaji_gop" <balaji_gop@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Padmanabhan" <aazhwar@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 12:31 AM
Dear Padmanaban swamin,
It is well known that one of the reasons for Udaiyavar not giving a
vyakyanam for Azhwar srisookthis is that people usually dont comment
on a moolam which Udaiyavar already had commented. Thus Udaiyavar did
not want to stop the divyanubhavams of his sishyas from pouring out as
vyakyanams. If PVP swamin's commentary has to be the only commentary
and all anubhavams should be revolving about it then it would mean
that Swami Desikan had committed apacharam by writing Nigama Parimalam.
Coming to the parrot episode. Swami Desikan in Sampradaya prakriya
bhaagam of Srimad Rahasya Traya Saram mentions that he is a mere
parrot who was taught to speak by Appullar. Appullar and Swami Desikan
are Acharya purushaas belong to our Emperumaanaar Darsanam. So it is
apt to mention the anubhavam of Uthamoor swami alluding to Desikan and
Appullar. When Madhavakannan swami clearly mentions that he is giving
us the divyanubhavams of Uthamoor swami, there is no reason for
confusion. Those who feel that Uthamoor swami's vyakyanams are
saampradayic would relish others would skip it.
Dasan,
Aravindalochanadasanudasan
------------------------------------
Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan
http://www.sadagopan.org Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Oppiliappan-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:Oppiliappan-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |