You are here: SriPedia - Oppiliappan - Archives - May 2008

Oppiliappan List Archive: Message 00165 May 2008

 
May 2008 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


SrI:

Dear Members : For Your Information .
V.Sadagopan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxx>; <andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
<lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
<ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram


>
> Dear Swamin:It is said "avataaraa: asankhyEya:" meaning that the Avataras 
> taken by the lord are countless.
> Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 are considered to be 
> major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are considered auxiliary avataras.
>
> Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras.
> Swami Desikan mentions "thirty and odd" in "Tattva Traya Chintana 
> Adhikaara" of his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram"
> Most of these avtaras have been described in Paancha Raatra Samhita.
>
> The Puranic Buddha in question is called "Aadhi Buddha" and is found 
> described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta PuraaNa (1.3.24),
> Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). You may have to go 
> through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and the Paancha Raatra
> Samhita, if you need greater details about this Pre-historic "Aadhi 
> Buddha"
>
> Thus, he is totally different from the Post-Puranic, "historical" Buddha 
> known as "Siddhaartha" and "Gautama Buddha"
>
> Hope this clarifies.
> Dasoham
> Anbil Ramaswamy
>
>
> To: andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Wed, 28 May 
> 2008 05:27:16 -0700Subject: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram
>
>
>
>
>
> srimathe ramanujaya namaha
>
> namo narayana
>
>                       ananthakoti dhandangal to  all bagavathas .In 
> srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about  budha avataram
>
>                        In that its  been told  the budha avataram is not 
> goutama budha tht people are following now .its some other budha 
> .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha avataram..
>
>                        My doubt is If it is not this goutama budha who is 
> tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned in website .
>
>                        .If we are capable of telling he is not the one we 
> should also be able to tell who is that?? when he lived ??why he is 
> considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did ?any pramanams for 
> telling he is not goutama budha..and also pramanams for the budha 
> mentioned .
>
>                       If we are not able to tell which budha he is ,when 
> he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we should not tell it is not 
> goutama budha with full confidence .
>
>                      I am not challenging anything here ..its my long time 
> doubt which is disturbing me .
>
>
> adiyen
> srisaila ramanuja dasan


------------------------------------

Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan
http://www.sadagopan.org Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Oppiliappan-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Oppiliappan-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list