SrI: Dear Members : For Your Information . V.Sadagopan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ram Anbil" <Ramanbil@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxx>; <andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM Subject: RE: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram > > Dear Swamin:It is said "avataaraa: asankhyEya:" meaning that the Avataras > taken by the lord are countless. > Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 are considered to be > major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are considered auxiliary avataras. > > Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras. > Swami Desikan mentions "thirty and odd" in "Tattva Traya Chintana > Adhikaara" of his "Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram" > Most of these avtaras have been described in Paancha Raatra Samhita. > > The Puranic Buddha in question is called "Aadhi Buddha" and is found > described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta PuraaNa (1.3.24), > Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). You may have to go > through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and the Paancha Raatra > Samhita, if you need greater details about this Pre-historic "Aadhi > Buddha" > > Thus, he is totally different from the Post-Puranic, "historical" Buddha > known as "Siddhaartha" and "Gautama Buddha" > > Hope this clarifies. > Dasoham > Anbil Ramaswamy > > > To: andavan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lordsrinivasa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > malolan_net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > srirangasri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: shalu_holy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: Wed, 28 May > 2008 05:27:16 -0700Subject: [SriRangaSri] doubt on bhudha avataram > > > > > > srimathe ramanujaya namaha > > namo narayana > > ananthakoti dhandangal to all bagavathas .In > srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about budha avataram > > In that its been told the budha avataram is not > goutama budha tht people are following now .its some other budha > .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha avataram.. > > My doubt is If it is not this goutama budha who is > tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned in website . > > .If we are capable of telling he is not the one we > should also be able to tell who is that?? when he lived ??why he is > considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did ?any pramanams for > telling he is not goutama budha..and also pramanams for the budha > mentioned . > > If we are not able to tell which budha he is ,when > he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we should not tell it is not > goutama budha with full confidence . > > I am not challenging anything here ..its my long time > doubt which is disturbing me . > > > adiyen > srisaila ramanuja dasan ------------------------------------ Oppiliappan Koil Varadachari Sadagopan http://www.sadagopan.org Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Oppiliappan/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:Oppiliappan-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:Oppiliappan-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Oppiliappan-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
oppiliappan-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |