Hi, vishNu means "one who pervades" from the sanskrit root "viz - to pervade". In Rg veda, he appears as yonger brother of Indra and lauded for making "three steps". Traditionl Indian scholars interpreted this as sun's daily movement across earth, firmament and sky. European scholars generally accepted this, but proposed other theories of sun's annual movement instead of daily one. However, in shathapatha brAhmaNa of shukla yajurveda the equation vishNu = sacrifice appears. If you read my previous post, beheading of vishNu appears in the context of pravargya rite, in which the sacrifice loses its head. The same story with variations occur in taittriya samhita & maitrAyaNIya samhita. It is connected with a parallel legend of dadhyanc AtharvaNa learning to fix the head of sacrifice from Indra and teaching it to Ashvins. vishNu as omnipresent, omniscient, all-powerful is a purANic concept. {Moderator's note: The above statement is an opinion of sri. Anshuman, and does not seem to be supported by our AchAryAs; Sri anshuman - please preface your opinions as such, and do not make general statements like the above) Regards, KK P.S. Thanks for pointing out my deficiency in sanskrit. I've seen trishtub as trishtup only in compounds like trishtup-chanda: etc. --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Vishnu" <vsmvishnu@xxxx> wrote: > Hi amshuman, > > Vishnu means ominpresent. How do we behead or break something which > is infinite? > > --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "amshuman_k" <amshuman_k@xxxx> wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > The first legend about "beheading of vishNu; dadhyanc AtharvaNA > > story" was posted earlier. > > > > This legend occurs during the explanation of darsha-pUrNamAsa ishti > > in S.Br. > > > > Once there was a clash between asuras and devas and the latter were > > worsted. The asuras started dividing this earth among themselves by > > spreading out ox-hide from west to east. When the devas saw this, > > they also wanted a share of this earth. They went to the asuras > with > > vishNu as their head, as vishNu is verily the sacrifice, and asked > > for a share. The asuras grudgingly agreed, but allowed a share > > corresponding the the size of vishNu. > > Now this vishNu was a dwarf (****). The devas didn't care anyway > and > > agreed to the condition. They enclosed vishNu with gAyatrI metre on > > the south-side, trishtub on the west-side and jagatI on the north. > > It is not trishtub but trishtup. We are supposed to recite dwayam, > gAyatrI etc. correctly and know the basic differnece bewteen sanskrit > letters pa, pha, ba, bha etc. before writing on sandhyAvandanam, > vEdas etc. > > Again how something which is infinite can be enclosed? > > Regards > Vishnu
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |