What was the remark made by Kanchi Acharya? We can do business with Kanchi Acharya and Shaivates. If it is a valid remark we can discuss about it. It is important to have good relationship with Kanchi Acharya as he is the school of thought and a good peedam for a few centuries. Srirangam Chakravarthy shantha kumar <kmshantha_kumar@xxxx> wrote: SriMathe RamAnujAya Namaha: SriMadh Vara Vara Munaye Namaha: Dear Members, Here is more update on TTD published in The Hindu dated March 16. Link: http://www.hindu.com/2004/03/17/stories/2004031705910500.htm Vaishnavite seers criticise remarks by Kanchi Acharya By Our Special Correspondent CHENNAI, MARCH 16. Vaishnavite seers and mutt heads today strongly criticised the reported remarks by Sri Jayendra Saraswati of Kanchi in Hyderabad on the internal affairs of the Venkateswara temple at Tirumala. In a strongly-worded statement released at a press conference here, Sriperumbudur Embar Jeer, Melkote Yatiraja Jeer, Vanamamalai Kaliyan Ramanuja Jeer, Sriperumbudur Varada Yatiraja Jeer and Kanchi Azhagia Manavala Jeer said the Sankaracharya was in no way connected with the internal affairs of the Tirumala-Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD). They said Sri Tridandi Sriman Narayana Jeer made suggestions to the TTD for restoring `aagama' modalities and traditional customs and practices as reestablished by Sri Ramanuja and his disciple, Sri Anantaazhvaan, in the 11-12th centuries AD. As the Jeer's suggestions were given to preserve and enhance the temple's sanctity, the Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and the TTD received the suggestions in the spirit with which they were made and agreed to implement them. Rituals at Tirumala were being guided by Vykhanasa Agama, with which the Kanchi Acharya had no connection. He had no locus standi on the affairs of the Vaishnavite temple, they said. The Kanchi Mutt head would agree that no Vaishnavite seer would be given any role in the affairs of Siva temples. Legally too, as confirmed by a Privy Council judgment, one had no right to interfere in the affairs of temples belonging to other sects. The Jeers said they would not encourage or be party to any derogatory comment, which would disrupt harmony amongst Hindus. The common people were not interested in divisions between Vaishnavism and Saivism that would lead to confusion, they said. ================ (End of Article) Shantha Kumar Kazhiyur Mannar http://www15.brinkster.com/mudaliandan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. Yahoo! India Promos: Win a trip for 2 to Britain. Click here. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |