vtca <vtca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: adiyEn was not stating on my own that sEshatvam is ("might be") destroyed. I was only quoting what pUrvAcharyas have said and what latter day acharyas have coommented on them. Mumukshuppadi says clearly "azhikkum pOdhu" and all commentaries that I have seen and heard on this state that this refers to sEshatvam. One member in this forum said that this means that simply the bhAvam is destroyed. I do not buy that argument, as it sounds like the jIva is trying to fool the Lord. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Sriman Venkatesan, By SEshatva bhAvam, I meant any ahankAram associated with it, i.e. we are SEsham on our own. As I have been saying, we remain for Him in a way He wishes. Take the case of BG 14-6. No commentary explains how sattva guNa binds us. Someone thought and analyzed. According to her, it is not on its own but because of our associated ahankAram. Otherwise it looks as if BG 14-6 supports advaitam. Vishnu --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/.itolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |