Dear Swamy,
I am so sorry for not being specific - I only meant about reading
tuqluq and not about Bhagavatha Puranam(why would I ever question
that??:)...
adiyEn,
rAmAnuja dAsan.
--- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, <aravamudhan@...> wrote:
>
> Narasimhan Swamin,
>
> Srimad Bhagavatha Mahapuram is one of the 6 satvika puranams and
per our Sri Vaishhava view it is considered authentic.
>
> I am also reading the series in the Thuklaq magazine. what the
editor of
> Thuklaq is writing is the same way as all advaitins have been
talking. It is not out of place to mention here about them
as 'Prachanna Saivities' (disguised Saivas)
>
> It is true that Dattatreya's account is mentioned . None of our
Acharyas would negate this.
>
> The very first slokam 'of Srimad Bhagavatam, beginning
with 'Janmasyatya' clearly establishes Vishistadvaita.
>
> In several places in Srimad Baghavatam, the paratvam of Peruman is
clearly established .
>
> Most of the quotes of our Alwars are only from Srimad Bhagavatam.
>
> The issue here is Sri Cho Ramaswamy (Editor, Thuklaq) chooses to
> elaborate only those place where it is convenient to advaitins and
establish something such as 'all Mumoorthies are same' (Mumoorthy
Samyam)
>
> From the view of Sarira Sariri Bhava of Sri Vishitadvaita, this is
true. However, viewing from Seshi/sesha relationship, Srimad
Bhagavatam clearly says which God is the primordial God.
>
> The blame need to go to the editor and not to the Srimad Bhagavata
Mahapurnam.
>
>
> Adiyen,
>
> Regards
> KM Narayanan
> ---- Lakshmi Narasimhan <nrusimhann@...> wrote:
> > First of all, is it worth reading such a book at all :) I wonder
many
> > a times what authenticity would such books bring in?!
> > adiyEn,
> > rAmAnuja dAsan
> >
> > --- In ramanuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vidyalakshmi <vidya_lr@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sri:
> > >
> > > I was reading this week's edition of 'Hindu Maha
> > > Samuthram' in Thuglak. This talks about Srimad
> > > Bhagavatham - 2nd Baagam, 42nd Adhiyayam
> > >
> > > In this, it is said that Atri Muni's performed
> > > rigorous penance and prayed to the lord of all worlds
> > > that he should get a son equivalent to the lord of all
> > > worlds. Brahma, Vishnu and Sivan appeared before him
> > > and granted that Atri Maharishi will get three sons as
> > > the amsam of each of them and that there is no
> > > difference between the three.
> > >
> > > Why is there a contradiction like this in Bhagavatha
> > > Puranam, in the same series, i was also reading about
> > > other puranams where such things have been said.
> > >
> > > Could someone please explain this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vidya.
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam
http://www.vedics.net
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ramanuja/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:ramanuja-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:ramanuja-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ramanuja-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
ramanuja-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |