You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Dec 2005

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00012 Dec 2005

 
Dec 2005 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


brahman is trascendental to all forms of duality including good and bad. of 
course the lord is beyond good and bad. also it is actions and their results 
that are described as good and bad. but the lord is beyond action and inaction. 
   
  but this does not mean that good and bad dont have relative value. good 
actions recommended in sastras have the effect of purifying the consciouness 
and thereby helping us understand sastras and higher truths about god. so 
protection of dharma is useful.
   
  when the lord appears he does cause the death of the good ones. through their 
death he protects dharma. if bhishmacharya had not dies, kauravas and hence 
adhrma would have won. not only the death of bhishma but that of the 700 
million great souls who fought on the side of pandavas had the opportunity die 
remembering the lord in devotion. it is the greatest good because they returned 
to the abode of the lord.
   
  suresh iyengar <kp_suresh512@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Dear Bhagavathas

Adiyen knows nothing on Shastra Gnanam. As it occured
in adiyen's thought process wanted to share with all
to get my internal questions clarified.

When ever people talk about avatara and its purpose,
they quote many slokas and say that is to remove evil
and protect good. But many times the evil alone is not
removed along with that so call good is removed too.
Example in Mahabarata war great learned persons such
as Bhishmacharya etc were given death. Same way in any
wars between the nations in order to defend their
borders many good souls die. So if we consider the
good and bad attributed to persons then what is
happening should be called "aniyayam". On the other
hand I was going through some of the articles on Sri
Vaishnavam on other groups. What they described the SV
is "Sharira and Sharirik" Bhava. If that is the case
any thing and every thing should be part of "him".
Weather good or evil and hence there should be no
qualification for any act, since it is part of him and
why he should punish one part of his "body" and allow
another part to perish for his own action? is that
called his play his maya? Where from that good or bad
comes unless it is part of him? If it is part of him
why it is bad?

It will be great help if some one can answer these
doubts from Gnanasunyam.

Dasan

Suresh


            
__________________________________________ 
Yahoo! DSL ? Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 





  SPONSORED LINKS 
        Religious education   Beyond belief   Jehovah witness beliefs 
    
---------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS 

    
    Visit your group "SriRangaSri" on the web.
    
    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    
    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 

    
---------------------------------
  

  


                
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Personals
 Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
 Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/VkWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list