Dear Members Let me expand the question a little bit more... is it true in the modern context, where an individuals profession is not inherited, the Varnam is inherited? I would like to present a couple of thoughts on some assumptions people (at least many Brahmins I have seen) have about caste system and Varnashrama system. It was interesting to note the following observation in the posting by Sri. Tenkasi Viswanathan (In the thread "Must Read...". > The question of caste become centarl only when there are economic issues. Now, I might be quoting him slightly out of context. However, the analysis stands. The underlying assumption here, to me, seems to be that as long as people happy with their economic situation, as long as they get fed every day, and have a shelter, they are are happy with their profession, for, caste was nothing but the profession of the individual. I beg to differ. In my humble opinion, the problem with caste system is not economic disparity, but social disparity it imposes and the denial of liberty. For example, this assumption ignores the interest a person may have in another profession, at which he/she may be more adept. Thus it indirectly, through the validation of caste system along with equitable economic distribution, impinges upon an individual's liberty to choose that profession in which he/she is really interested in and may excel in. This is directly contrary to what Sri.Viswanathan has argued is (or should be) the case, as we will see. It is interesting to note that while I have heard of many glowing portraits of saints who were 'became' Brahmins, nowhere have I seen a portrait praising a Brahmin who 'became' a Vaishya... or a Shudra. To me, what this says is that to be a Brahmin is considered inherently superior. The roubling thing is that it has been generalized and extended not only to people who by their sadhana, became enlightened, but also to Brahmins who were Brahmins only because they were born into a Brahmin family. Thus, it runs contrary to the notion of "Different, yet equal" that Sri.Viswanathan has tried to propound using Purusha Suktham. Stated otherwise, the question is, if I am from a family of priests, adn uncle took to business, and was hugely successful too, is he still a Brahmin? Or does he automatically become a Vaishya? This question, IMHO, forms the core of the discussion on caste system. Interestingly to note that this is the precisely the question addressed in the posting on "Who is a Brahmin?", where Prof.V.Rangarajan seems to opine that my uncle is not a Brahmin. I have been a member of SriRangaSri since its inception and Bhakthi List for three years. In all these months, I have not seen any composed and ordered discussion on Caste system and its future. Every instance where it was brought up, it either got mired in personal attacks, or got answered with an idealistic, even answers like "nothing stops the Sudra on the road from becoming a Brahmin, just ask him to be another Valmiki". If Dharma is indeed a way of life, our social relations automatically become a part of our spirituality. History has shown that it is the spiritual leaders and thinkers who validated every important social and religious reform in the past, and they had served their societies well by doing so. I would like to humbly request that the learned members of this group put their mind to the question and lead a discussion. Regards Ramakrishnan
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia |
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com To subscribe to the list |