You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Nov 2006

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00027 Nov 2006

 
Nov 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


 

 

 

Srimate SrivanSatakopa Sri Vedanta Desika yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama:

 

To Eat or Not to Eat

 

The other day my friend, a true Bhaagavata, brought me some "Prasaadam" 
("Pongal", to be precise) from the nearby Srinivasan Sannidhi. All of us at 
home accepted it with gratitude and consumed it with relish, as it was 
delightful fare. Incidentally, have you ever noticed how prasaadams from the 
temple "madaippalli" (kitchen) taste somehow more delightful than food cooked 
at home, even though we might prepare the latter with the choicest and highest 
quality ingredients? For instance, my mother is considered an expert at making 
"Sarkkarai Pongal": however, the same delicacy from Sri Parthasarathy Sannidhi  
is somehow more delectable and its taste lingers on the palate for days 
together. The Tirupati Laddu is another delicious example-you can never hope to 
imitate at home its taste, fragrance and longevity, whatever be the ingredients 
you may use. The obvious reason is that anything prepared solely for the Lord 
at duly consecrated places of worship and consumed by Him, becomes tastier and 
healthier too, ipso facto.

 

However, an acquaintance of mine belonging to a different sect, who was present 
at the time the prasaadam was brought home, was horrified at our ready 
acceptance and consumption of the same. According to him, there were specific 
prohibitions against use of food which had been offered first to the Lord. 
Though he couldn't lay his finger on the specific texts which proscribed 
consumption of prasaadam, he said he would consult Shivaachaaryas and let me 
know. I do not know whom he consulted, but he did come up with a few credible 
scriptural texts, which apparently forbade reuse by us of food and other items 
offered to Emperuman.

 

The first and foremost argument against consumption of divine prasaadam was 
that it represented "left overs" or "ecchil" ("Ucchisshttam" in Sanskrit), 
which we have been taught time and again from childhood to eschew. We might 
have bitten from the same mango as our friend during childhood in ignorance, 
but after upanayanam especially, the standards of "ecchil" and "theettu" have 
been so ingrained in us that we would be horrified to partake of anything that 
has already been partly consumed by someone else. However high and mighty the 
person who has consumed the food first, the fact remains that the left over is 
indeed "ecchil" and as such unfit for consumption by another. Even if the Lord 
is the person to whom the food has been offered first, it remains a left over 
and how can we even think of its consumption, leave alone relish and revere it? 
These were the questions raised by the scriptural texts furnished by my 
acquaintance.

 

I was puzzled. This had never occurred to me before and with good reason too, 
for we have been following from time immemorial the practice of eating only 
food offered first to the Lord and it has been a hallowed tradition with Sri 
Vaishnavas to consume only Bhagavat Prasaadam. Though I put the vexing question 
on the back burner, it continued to trouble me, till I happened to peruse the 
"Sat Charitra Raksha" of Swami Desikan. It should have occurred to me much 
earlier that whatever be the question, if it dealt with subtle points of 
Shastram, then an answer would surely be found in the works of Swami Desikan, 
the Master Teacher who left nothing to doubt. The very question which had been 
put to me, I found, was dealt with elaborately by the Acharya, with scores of 
scriptural texts adduced in support. The work dealt not only with my problem, 
but with several other connected issues where doubts could arise in the minds 
of the uninformed like me. As the matter occupied the entire third chapter of 
the work, I presumed that even in those days there must have been people 
opposed to consumption of Bhagavat Prasaadam. And since Swami Desikan had cited 
portions of Sri Alavandar's Aagama Praamaanyam and Varadaraja Pandita's 
Sanmaarga Deepikaa, the question must indeed have lingered for more than a 
thousand years.

 

There are indeed some apparent objections in the Dharma Shastras to food first 
offered to the Lord being consumed by us. Maharshi Manu, while listing items of 
food which are to be avoided, includes food offered first to the 
Lord-"anupakrita maamsam cha devaannani haveemshi cha". Another Smriti tells us 
that if one happens to eat food left over after offering to Gods, we should 
perform atonement in the form of "Chaandraayanam"-"nirmalyam cha nivedyam cha 
bhuktva chaandrayanam charet". Since there is a general prohibition of food 
left over after consumption ("ecchil"), it would apply to Lord's left overs 
too. It can't be said that just as the left overs of the husband can be 
consumed by the wife and those of the father by his children, "ecchil" of the 
Lord too is admissible food for us, who are but His children-for, here, the 
father-child relationship is indirect, flowing from the fact that the Lord is 
the root-cause of all universe and not our direct father. If we were to admit 
this, then the left overs of Brahmaa, who is touted to be actual creator of all 
beings, should also, by the same token, be acceptable to Sri Vaishnavas.

 

Though Shastras permit consumption of one's father's left over, they extend no 
such concession in respect of food consumed by one's mother. And since Shastras 
tell us that the Lord, apart from being the Universal Father, is a common 
mother too to all of us-"Mata pita bhraata nivaasa: sharanam suhrit". By this 
token, since the Lord is our mother too, His left over should not be consumed 
by us.

 

Some Paancharatra texts like the Sanatkumara Samhita tell us that such left 
overs-not only food, but also flowers and fruits-- of the Lord are to be 
avoided with effort-

 

"Niveditam to yat dravyam pushpam phalam athaapi vaa

tat Nirmaalyam iti proktam tat prayatnena varjayet"

 

And strict atonement or praayaschittam is prescribed for eating such food 
offered to the Lord-that of drinking only milk for a whole month, the whole 
time reciting the holy Ashtaakshara mantra, for regaining purity lost due to 
the intake of prasaadam-

 

"Nirmaalyam bhakshayitvaa evam ucchishttam agururorapi

maasam payovratee bhootvaa ashtaaksharam japan sadaa

Brahma koorcha: tato peetvaa shuddhi: bhavati maanava:"

 

"Nirmaalyaani cha na asneeyaat na jighret na cha langhayet"

 

Not only should such food and flowers offered to the Lord not be partaken of, 
they should not even be smelt or stepped over.

 

However, against these negative texts, there are a thousand other quotes from 
the scripture which categorically lay down that it is only bhagavat prasaadam 
that is to be consumed by us. For instance, the Mahopanishad tells us that we 
should eat and drink only that food which has been offered to the Lord, smell 
only that which He has worn-"Vishnunaa attam asnanti, Vishnu peetam pibanti, 
Vishnunaa ghraatam jighranti, Vishnu rasitam rasayanti, tasmat vidvaamso Vishnu 
uphritam bhakshayeyu:". The Lord Himself tells us in the Gita that whatever we 
eat or drink should first be dedicated to Him-

 

"Yat karoshi yat asnaasi yat juhoshi dadaasi yat

Yat pasyasi Kounteya! Tat kurushva mat arpanam"

 

Every morsel of food unoffered to God that we partake represents a great morsel 
of sin that we contract, says the Bhagavat Gita

 

Such is the insistence of Shastras on the prior offering of food to Lord, that 
even items of food which have not been offered to the Lord, but which were 
received only at the time of the meal, are supposed to be offered to the Lord 
at least mentally, before being partaken of by us. The Paarameswara Samhita 
tells us that such bhagavat prasadam should not only be consumed as a matter of 
course, but is to be partaken of for ridding oneself of all sin-

 

"Tatastu Bhagavat bhuktam praasneeyaat niyata; svayam. 

Kshayaaya sarva paapaanaam koshtta siddhyayepi cha"

 

Such prasaadam, which is the holiest of holies, is not only to be consumed by 
us, but also to be shared with all bhaagavatas and bhaktas and with the entire 
family-

 

"Dattam bhaagavata shreshttai: Vishnave prabhavishnave

tat pavitram pavitraanaam pavanaanaam cha paavanam

daatavyam dvijaateenam bhaktaanaam paavanaaya cha"

 

If the mere touch of the prasaadam purifies us beyond measure and makes us 
sacred and eligible for all karmas, should we say anything about eating and 
drinking bhagavat prasadam?+

 

"Svayam chaapi tat asneeyat sarva papa visuddhaye

Tasya samsparsanat bhojanaat dhaaranaat sadaa

Suchi: bhavati Viprendra! Sarva karmasu sammata:"

 

The Paadma Samhita tells us that partaking of bhagavat prasadam, which is the 
most sacred of foods, is a must and failure to do so would be sinful and lead 
to our down fall. While food offered to the Lord, His Consorts, Garuda, 
Sudarsana and other Ayudhas is to be accepted and consumed with eagerness, that 
offered to Brahma, Rudra, et al is to be avoided at all cost and not even to be 
touched-

 

"Brahma Eesaanaadi devaanaam naiva bhojyam niveditam

na sprisyam no langhaneeyam chandaadeenaam tathaiva cha

Deveenaam tu Sriyaadeenaam Vinata nandasya cha

Chakradeenaam Ayudhaanaam vastu yat yat niveditam

Bhoktavyam eva sarvesham vipradeenaam asankitam

Vishno: niveditam sarvam paavanaanaam cha paavanam

Praapanam durlabham bhojyam na tyaajyam syaat kadaachana

Bhunjaanaanaam edhate Sree:tyajataam pariheeyate

Vrata upavaasa tulitam asanam tasya paavanam"

 

Just as young men covet the "taamboolam" that has been sweetened by the saliva 
of their sweet hearts, bhaktas and Rishis long for bhagavat prasadam-

 

"Sesha bhuktim prasamsanti Munyaya: tattva darsina:

yuvaana:khalu vaanchanti taamboolam tarunee mukhaat"

 

Eating is akin to a Yagam-it is known as Anuyaagam. And the mantras used in 
this yaagam are, "praanaaya svaaha, apaanaaya svaahaa" etc., to the 
accompaniment of which food is to be taken with the middle finger, etc.

 

Srimad Ramayanam tells us that Sri Rama took prasaadam offered first to Sriman 
Narayana, on the night prior to His coronation-

 

"Mahate daivataaya aajyam juhaava jvalitenale

sesham cha havishastasya praasyaat aatmana: priyam

dhyaayan Narayanam devam"

 

Though several Pancharatra Samhitas have been quoted above to the effect that 
food offered to the Lord is to be partaken of as prasadam, Smritis are clear 
that such prasaadam should not be given to those ineligible for it-

 

"Apaatraanaam abhaktaanaam naastikaanaam duraatmanaam

mantrapootam cha naivedyam nishiddhanaam cha dadaati ya:

siddhopi yaati paatityam aarurukushustu kim puna:

 

Prasaadam is to be preserved with effort from such ineligible people, as also 
from dogs, cats, monkeys, birds and rats. In case such prasaadam happens to be 
partaken of by such people or animals, one should perform praayaschittam by 
reciting the Ashtaaksharam a 108 times with concentration.

 

We are indeed puzzled-there is a host of texts prescribing compulsory 
consumption of food offered to the Lord, while there appear to be many others 
proscribing the same. Swami Desikan tells us that such apparent dichotomy among 
the Smirits can be reconciled, if only we realize that both prescription and 
proscription of bhagavat prasaadam are true, but relate to food offered to 
different deities. While those offered to the Lord are indeed sacred and are to 
be partaken of with eagerness, those offered to other devatas like Brahma and 
Rudra are to be avoided at all cost, says the Brahma Puranam-

 

"Vishno: niveditam shuddham munibhi: bhojyam uchyate

anyat nivedyam nirmaalyam bhuktvaa chaandraayanam charet

 

Thus, Nirmaalyam/Nivedyam or left over, refers only to fruits, flowers and food 
offered to other deities like Rudra and it is to such food that the scriptural 
texts advocating avoidance should be attributed, says Swami Desikan.

 

Food or other items set apart for offering to the Lord is known as "Devaannam" 
and should not be used by us prior to such offering. If this is done, we 
attract sin, which is washed away only by due atonement, says Sri Poushkara 
Samhita-

 

"Praak saadhitam cha yaagaartham devataanaam prayatnata:

Tat samarpana paryantam yaavat devaannam uchyate

Anyatha bhakshanam tasya yadi mohaat kritam Dvija!

Praayaschitta shatai: cheernai: succhi: bhavati maanava:"

 

Manu's strong advice to avoid Devannam  (that which is set apart for offering 
to the Lord), indicates that food should not be used by us prior to being 
offered to Emperuman. After offering, it becomes prasaadam and it is perfectly 
in order for us to partake of the same.

 

Decrying or disregarding such prasaadam, whether it be food offered to the 
Lord, sandal paste, flowers, etc., is sure to make us rot in hell, as is 
pointed out by Sri Rudra to Skanda, in Ishwara Samhita. The same Samhita tells 
us whatever has come off the Lord's divine body-Kumkumam, Chandanam, Tulasi, 
flowers, fragrant powder, etc.-are extremely sacred and one who applies the 
same to his forehead reaps the fruits of having performed a hundred Ashwamedha 
yaagas. This should teach us not to leave kumukumam, Manjal kaappu etc. which 
we receive in temples, either smeared on the pillars or on shelves in the 
temple.

 

"Kumkumam chandanam chaiva karpooram cha anulepanam

Vishnu deha paraamrishtam tat vai paavana paavanam"

 

If such is the greatness of food, etc. offered to the Lord, what about water 
used to wash His holy feet? Sacred water from the Lord's feet is capable of 
washing away all sins and confers merits to be obtained from bathing in all the 
holy rivers of the land-

 

"Prithivyaam yaani teertthaani teshu snaanena yat phalam

Vishno: paadodakam moordhnaa dhaarayet sarvam aapnuyaat"

 

The Bhaagavata Puranam tells us that Sri Sankara has full realization of the 
holiness of water from the Lord's feet, for it is he who bears the Ganga on his 
head, the Ganga which originated from the Lord's tiruvadi during 
Trivikramaavataaram-

 

"Paadodakasya maahaatmyam jaanaati eva hi Sankara:

Vishnu paadodbhavaam Gangaaam shirasa adhaarayat hi sa:

 

Defining a Vaishnava, Bhaagavatam tells us that he is one who has Sriman 
Narayana's glorious form etched deep in his heart, the Lord's name on his lips, 
food offered to the Lord in his stomach and the water from His feet on his head-

 

"Hridi roopam mukhe naama naivedyam udare Hare:

Paadodakam cha nirmaalyam yasya moordhni sa Vaishnava:

 

Sri Paada Teerttham of Bhaagavaataas is as holy as sacred water from the Lord's 
feet

and is capable of destroying all our sins, says Sri Sounaka-

 

"Bhakta paadachutenaapi mat snaapita jalena vaa

nara: paapaat pramuchyeta snaana paanaadi karmabhi:"

 

Those who wear daily, garlands offered first to the Lord, are sure of a berth 
in paradise, says Sounaka again-

 

"Maalaam ya: dhaarayet nityam Vaishnaveem bhaktim aashrita:

sarva paapa vinirmukta: sa yaati paramaam gatim

 

>From this, it appears to follow that when we are offered the Lord's garland at 
>a sannidhi, we should not remove it from our necks immediately, but should 
>remember its holiness and the fact that it has had the fortune to adorn the 
>Lord's chest.

 

All of us eat food which has first been offered to the Lord during 
Tiruvaaradhanam. What if some item is served in the middle of breakfast, which 
has not been offered to the Lord first? We should, prior to consuming the same, 
offer it mentally to the lord, says the Bharadvaaja Samhita. This applies to 
anything and everything that we use-flowers, new clothes, jewels, 
etc-everything should first be offered to the Lord and then appropriated for 
our use, as bhagavat prasaadam. This is what Sri Periazhwar lays down as the 
principal attribute of the Lord's devotees-they wear only what the Lord has 
worn and cast off, they adorn themselves with flowers and Tulasi which have 
first had the good fortune of association with Emperuman's divine body-"Uduttha 
kalainda nin peethaka aadai, udutthu kalattha thundu, thoduttha tuzhaai malar 
soodi kalaindana soodum it tondarkalom"

 

The sacredness of bhagavat prasaadam can be gauged from the reverence with 
which Sri Vishvaksena is held. Though he is the Lord's Prime Minister, he is 
popularly known as one who consumes with relish the leftovers of the 
Lord-"Seshaasana:"-Tvadeeya bhukta ujjhita sesha bhoginaa"(Sri Alavandar).

 

Swmi Desikan says the practice in some places, especially in Kerala, of not 
consuming bhagavat prasaadam, is clearly wrong, in view of the aforesaid.

 

Another question that often troubles us is this--Does the Lord really eat what 
we place before Him during Tiruvaaradhanam? Since the quantum or variety of 
food that is offered doesn't diminish even a little even after the offering, is 
it not evident that the Lord does not partake of the food, with however much 
devotion and love it is offered and by however devoted a person? If such be the 
case, are we deluding ourselves that we are partaking of food offered to the 
Lord, as the Lord doesn't appear to accept the same? This calls into question 
the very basis of temple worship, for the huge quantities of food and other 
offerings to the Lord would apparently appear to be a waste, as the Lord 
doesn't care for them nor has any use for them.

 

Not so, says the Saatvata Samhita. Food consists of two parts-the gross and 
subtle. The Lord accepts the subtle portion of the offering, when it is done 
with devotion. Thus, though there is no apparent reduction in the quantity of 
offering commensurate with the Lord's acceptance thereof, the essence of the 
food-Rasam-is indeed consumed by Emperuman-

 

"Kapittasya phalam chaiva yathaa kunjara bhakshitam

tasya saaram cha grinheeyaat tathaa havirasam Prabhu:

 

When food is offered to other Devatas, is it proper to offer it first to the 
Lord and then to the former? For instance, while performing the annual ceremony 
(Pratyaabdhika shraaddham) for one's father, those who are to be propitiated 
are the Pitru Devatas. Since the ritual is performed principally for them, 
should not food be cooked separately, rather than our offering them the left 
overs of the Lord?

 

The Paadma Samhita clearly lays down that only food that has been offered to 
the Lord should be submitted to other Devatas, including Pitru devatas-

 

"Vishno: nivedita annena yashtavyam Devataantaram 

Pitrubhyascha tat deyam taccha aanantyaaya kalpate."

 

Thus, in Shraaddham as well as in Vaisvadevam, it is food that has been offered 
first to the Lord that is to be used.

 

Are you surprised that there is so much behind the prasaadam which we routinely 
accept and consume? Yes, indeed, and what I have indicated is only the barest 
outline. I would invite readers to have a feast by perusing the original works 
of Swami Desikan, each of which is an invaluable gem, capable of destroying 
darkness and ignorance with its luster and luminance.

 

Srimate Sri Lakshmi Nrisimha divya paduka sevaka SrivanSatakopa Sri Narayana 
Yatindra Mahadesikaya nama:

dasan, sadagopan

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:SriRangaSri-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:SriRangaSri-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list