You are here: SriPedia - SriRangaSri - Archives - Nov 2006

SriRangaSri List Archive: Message 00105 Nov 2006

 
Nov 2006 Indexes ( Date | Thread | Author )
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]


 Post 4

Dear sri vaishNava perunthagaiyeer,



In the previous three posts we saw on lakshmana donning four roles, being

   - the baalya sakhaa, the friend in young or childhood days of raama,
   - the vazhith thuNaivan ? companion for raama in the 'long trekking'
   from mithila to sidhDhaasrama and from there to mithila, along with sage
   visvaamithra,
   - the husband of oormiLa ? his beloved wife
   - the assistant administrator of ayOdhyaa.



In this the 'husband' role of lakshmaNa, the role was taken up by him with
the consent of the 'father and king' dhasaratha ? for ? we have already seen
that raama did not agree to the marriage, once the siva dhanus was broken by
him ? message was sent to king dhasaratha and after he came to mithila and
gave his consent to the proposal of marriage of raama and seethaa, then only
the marriage took place. This is as said by seethaa to sage athri's wife
anasooya, in the forest, when she described her marriage events. [Re MGV's
article earlier]



The 'administrator' role of lakshmaNa, - this role was simply offered by
raama, without lakshmaNa asking for it. Perhaps you may have noticed the
words stated by vaalmeeki ? just to repeat it again -



gathE cha bharathE raamO *lakshmaNa: cha* mahaabala: || 1-77-20
pitharam dhEva sankaa*s*am poojayaamaasathu: thadhaa |



Point: please note here raama did the administration for welfare of people
"with lakshmaNa". So whatever raama did for people, it is 'along with
lakshmaNa'. So that 'assistant administrator' role is a natural flow of
authority from raama. But whatever raama did, was with the consent of father
and king dhasaratha.



Now let us take up the next role ? the angry younger brother of raama -
ready even to fight against the revered father just in front of his admired
elder brother raama. This role is a 'self assigned one' for lakshmaNa, for
raama did not offer, or for that matter nobody else. That role lakshmaNa
played, is out of sheer love for raama and his welfare.



Let us go into the details. Perhaps we have to go a bit lengthy [may be one
or more posts] to understand that role and its full magnitude.



The proposal of coronation was made in the durbar of king dhasaratha.
Arrangements were being made in all places. Meanwhile king went to meet his
3rd wife kaikEyee, and after a long chain of happenings, raama was called to
the palace of kaikEyee. On being informed by sumanthra, the minister, that
father dhasaratha is calling from the palace of kaikEyee, *when raama went
there he did not go alone* [or to that palace or room where kaikEyee and
dhasaratha were there]. *He went with lakshmaNa. *



See slOkams ? why all these preludes - is to prove that from the time raama
was being informed about his vana vaasam, it was not a surprise to
lakshmaNa, and thus he did not become angry suddenly.



parvathaath iva nishkramya simhO giri guhaa*s*aya: |

lakshmaNam dhvaari sO~apasyath praanjaliputam sthhitham | | 2-16-26



meaning: That Raama who came out [out of his room in raamaa's palace], like
a lion residing in a mountain cave from out of the mountain, saw Lakshmana
standing at the door, bowing with palms of the hand joined and put to the
forehead as a mark of respect.



chhathra chaamara paaNi: thu lakshmaNa:  raaghava anuja: | 2-16-32

jugOpa bhraatharam  bhraathaa rathham aasthaaya  prushTatha: | |



meaning: Lakshmana, Raama's younger brother mounted the chariot in the
back-side and protected Raama with umbrella and chaamara fan.



*Points:* There, in the palace, when mother kaikEyee informed raama [along
with lakshmaNa] about this '14 years of forest living' raama did not show
any reaction. But when both raama and lakshmaNa came out lakshmaNa's face
was drawn down with sorrow, and that itself sent signals across to all, that
things are not in right direction for the coronation.



In many a upanyaasams, when the speakers describe these incidents, they just
trot out, as though raama was alone, and later when lakshmaNa came to know
about this 'forest going affair' of his elder, LakshmaNa became angry. But
vaalmeeki shows us, all along lakshmaNa was there with raama. [Of course the
speakers intentions are to cover the course of the main story, and as such
may skip this point]. But for us while studying in detail about lakshmaNa,
this is a big and important point.



raamasya thu vacha sruthvaa bhrusam dhu:kha gatha:  pithaa |

sOkaath a*s*aknuvan bhaashpam prurOdha maahaasvanam | | 2-19- 27



meaning: On hearing raama, father became extremely sad and shed tears and
became unconscious.



tham bhaashpa paripoorNa aksha: prushTathO anujagaama ha |

lakshmaNa: parama krudhdha: sumithraa aanandha vardhana: || 2-19-30



meaning: Lakshmana, the son of Sumitra, felt very angry, with his eyes
filled with tears and accompanied behind Raama.



*Point:* See here ? when raama left the palace of kaikEyee, lakshmaNa
accompanied raama and he did not react, but only felt angry and sad.



tham guNai: samathaam praapthO bhraathaa vipula vikarama: |

soumithri: anuvavraaja Dhaarayan dhu:kham aathmajam | | 2-19- 39



meaning: Lakshmana, *who got virtues equal to Raama*, *who was having great
heroic valour* and *who was the brother*, kept the grief within himself and
went along with Raama.



Point: See the descriptions of vaalmeeki here about lakshmaNa. LakshmaNa
kept the sorrow within for a while, when he was in kaikEyee's chamber and in
front of father. But later only he burst out.



Starting from kaikEyee's palace raama, with lakshmaNa, went straight to
inform mother kousalyaa. When he talked to mother, see what raama said ?



dhEvi noonam na jaaneeshE mahath bhayam upasthhitham |

idham thaa cha dhu:khaaya vaidhEhyaa lakshmaNasya cha | | 2-20 ? 27



meaning: Oh, mother! You do not know that a great dismay is approaching now.
It brings grief to you, to Seethaa and to Lakshmana.



Again see the point here ? raama does not express any sort of discomfort or
sadness or anguish in his being ordered to go to forest ? only mother,
seethaa and lakshmaNa are going to get grief and not himself. Already
lakshmaNa is experiencing that.



Yet another important point is here. Perhaps that is not so relevant to our
main discussion on lakshmaNa. But since that is very important and gives a
good new twist, I thought of sharing with you all [for many may have a
different version of story]. Raama says to mother kousalyaa -



chathurdhasa hi varshaaNi vathsyaami vijanE vanE |

madhu moola phalai: jeevan hithvaa munivadh aami*s*am || 2-20-29

* *

Meaning: I shall live in a solitary forest like a sage for fourteen years,
leaving off meat and living with roots, fruits and honey".



So it is not a surprise that when hanumaan meets seethaa in asOkha vanam and
says raama is neither eating meat, nor drinking madhu ? wine etc, it is not
a surprise, which she also knows fully well. And that is as per his talk or
assurance, here, to his mother - he lives true to his word ? raamO
vigrahavaan dharma: Further please do not forget that he had that two
powerful manthraas bala and athibala given by sage visvaamithra when they
set out on mission kill thaataka.



Here paravaak kottai srimadh aaNdavan swamy in his book 'raama piraanaik
karpOm' gives a side story to this assurance ? swamy says ? brahmaa gave a
boon to raavaNa as asked by him - that raavaNa cannot be killed by anybody
else, except a person, who lives like a sage in forest for 14 long years,
eating only roots, fruits, leaves. So when this boon was granted by brahma
to raavaNa, raavaNa thought he just cannot be killed by anybody, for who
will live like that in a forest, that too for 14 long years.



MGV adds perhaps raavaNa was thinking that if such a human ? a naran ? frail
human personality - could live like that, there in the forest, for such a
long time, then he will not have enough strength to fight a monster like
himself ? so he was so much happy to get such a boon from brahma.



Now I expect some questions here from the elite readers.



Sinc length of the post applies brakes we will continue in next post.



Dhasan




-- 
Vasudevan MG


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SriRangaSri/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:SriRangaSri-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:SriRangaSri-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    SriRangaSri-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index ] [Thread Index ] [Author Index ]
Home Page
http://www.ibiblio.org/sripedia
srirangasri-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To subscribe to the list