You are right: In German and Dutch we have strong verbs (vowel-change in stems in different tenses) and weak verbs (using tense-suffixes) and even some verbs with a mix of weak and strong tenses.
Languages are not mathematical constructs, so “irregularities” are the spices of the linguistic-fun!
Search found 153 matches
- April 15th, 2024, 2:02 am
- Forum: Greek Language and Linguistics
- Topic: English irregular verbs and Greek stem changes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2949
- February 8th, 2024, 5:15 am
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: NT - Manuscript-Transcriptions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2000
- February 8th, 2024, 3:10 am
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: NT - Manuscript-Transcriptions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2000
Re: NT - Manuscript-Transcriptions
I forgot to open the file as shared with everybody with the link!
Now it is shared1
Now it is shared1
- February 7th, 2024, 2:47 pm
- Forum: New Testament
- Topic: NT - Manuscript-Transcriptions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2000
NT - Manuscript-Transcriptions
The INTF and the IGNTP both have a lot of manuscript-transcriptions, but it is not possible on their Websites to search a specific reading in all transcriptions. So I collected all available Transcripts of both institutes and built a kind of raw database (in ascii). Now I can search (with some simpl...
- December 20th, 2023, 2:00 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23146
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
Ken, You are probably right, six Chrysostom-mss seem to have ομορος instead of ομορου. TLG points for Chrys. tot PG53, p. 326 line 30 (that is Homilie XXXV: http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/20vs/103_migne_pg_g/1815-1875,_Migne,_PG_053_(04-01)_Joannes_Chrysostomus._Opera_Omnia,_GM.pdf. This Volu...
- December 20th, 2023, 11:23 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23146
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
I don’t find any witness in the Chrysostom-Migne Edition with Μαμβρη and Αμορις/ομορις/ομορος/ομορου etc.
Mind: The Cambridge Septuagint used the Chrysostom quotations based on notes of De Lagarde, so to say “second hand”.
Maybe someone with admission to the Göttingen Sept. could check that.
Mind: The Cambridge Septuagint used the Chrysostom quotations based on notes of De Lagarde, so to say “second hand”.
Maybe someone with admission to the Göttingen Sept. could check that.
- December 20th, 2023, 8:45 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23146
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
Regarding τηι δρυι τηι Μαμβρη i looked in Migne Patrologia Graeca (good OCR’s here: http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/pgm/PG_Migne/) and I found some readings with Μαμβρηι instead of Μαμβρη, so probably Μαμβρη was read as the name of the tree, not the name of the owner. ATHANASIUS-D-GR/De sancta trinitat...
- December 19th, 2023, 1:37 pm
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23146
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
The so called “Cambridge Maior” can be downloaded at Archive.org (there search for: Brooke Cambridge Septuagint) and You will find the published books, free download! The Cambridge-Edition was never completed, since the Göttingen Septuaginta Projekt was started (https://adw-goe.de/en/forschung/abges...
- December 19th, 2023, 2:51 am
- Forum: Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha
- Topic: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
- Replies: 18
- Views: 23146
Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13
It’s not necessary that Chryststom himself changed to ομορος, possibly he had a manuscript with that reading:
https://archive.org/details/oldtestamen ... ew=theater
https://archive.org/details/oldtestamen ... ew=theater
- December 5th, 2023, 1:39 am
- Forum: Greek Language and Linguistics
- Topic: Ιησους-paradigmn
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7704
Re: Ιησους-paradigmn
I gave the LXX-Paradigm of Thackaray:
ιησους - ιησου - ιησοι/ιησου - ιησουν.
That is exactly the question:
The non-biblical papyri have a different paradigm from the biblical texts (LXX and NT etc).
In Kata-Biblon one can find the ιησοι-dative in LXX.
ιησους - ιησου - ιησοι/ιησου - ιησουν.
That is exactly the question:
The non-biblical papyri have a different paradigm from the biblical texts (LXX and NT etc).
In Kata-Biblon one can find the ιησοι-dative in LXX.