Concordance including all the versions?

[Stephen Hughes]

How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/

[Alan Bunning]

How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/

Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?

[Stephen Hughes]

How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/

Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?

Do you have a range of error codes to assign errors to different classes?

[Alan Bunning]

How does your algorithm deal with the extra ΤΑΥ in Codex Vaticanus in John 11:11 (659v, col.3, l.21)?

In the third column here.

The website for the manuscripts is presently http://greekcntr.org/

Right now it has it identified as an errant form of ουτοσ. I suppose I could just code it as an error. Do you have an alternative suggestion?

Do you have a range of error codes to assign errors to different classes?

I don't currently, but that is not a bad idea.

[Stephen Hughes]

It is not something that you need to think through from scratch. There are standard names for scribal errors which you could use as the basis for your error classification codes too. I think this one would be classified as "dittography".