Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
I'm asking this question just to help clarify things in my mind ...
Does the lexical form of a contract verb (e.g., τιμάω = "I honor" = 1st pers pres act indic) actually exist, or is it a theoretial form only? In other words, since the (contracted) 1st pers pres act indic of τιμάω = τιμῶ ("I honor"), then why isn't τιμῶ the lexical form we find listed in BDAG rather than τιμάω?
While in practice it's easy to find the lexical form (φιλέω) of a contract verb (φιλῶ) in BDAG, in theory it means we need to know lexical forms that we will never actually encounter when reading Greek? Seems kinda weird.
Does the lexical form of a contract verb (e.g., τιμάω = "I honor" = 1st pers pres act indic) actually exist, or is it a theoretial form only? In other words, since the (contracted) 1st pers pres act indic of τιμάω = τιμῶ ("I honor"), then why isn't τιμῶ the lexical form we find listed in BDAG rather than τιμάω?
While in practice it's easy to find the lexical form (φιλέω) of a contract verb (φιλῶ) in BDAG, in theory it means we need to know lexical forms that we will never actually encounter when reading Greek? Seems kinda weird.
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: May 20th, 2014, 10:13 am
- Location: west coast of Canada
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
No There is no such form as τιμάω. It is a contrived form, and the reason for its existence is to show you the stem vowel on the verb (α in this case). You're not the only one who thinks that it "Seems kinda weird." Quite a few here would agree with you, including Randall Buth and Stephen Carlson who would argue that the lexical form should be the infinitive, which is a real form and which also gives the critical information. For example: τιμᾶν for τιμάω or ποιεῖν for ποιέω. I believe there is also a suggestion that the aorist infinitive should be included as a standard part of the lexical information.WAnderson wrote:I'm asking this question just to help clarify things in my mind ...
Does the lexical form of a contract verb (e.g., τιμάω = "I honor" = 1st pers pres act indic) actually exist, or is it a theoretial form only? In other words, since the (contracted) 1st pers pres act indic of τιμάω = τιμῶ ("I honor"), then why isn't τιμῶ the lexical form we find listed in BDAG rather than τιμάω?
While in practice it's easy to find the lexical form (φιλέω) of a contract verb (φιλῶ) in BDAG, in theory it means we need to know lexical forms that we will never actually encounter when reading Greek? Seems kinda weird.
γράφω μαθεῖν
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
Thanks. Is this the case with the "lexical" form of all, most, or just some contract verbs?
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
As with most bold generalizations about a language, "never" is too strong a word: you will see uncontracted forms of verbs in Ionic dialect -- if you ever have occasion to read a text composed in Ionic (Herodotus and some others); it's generally the case with Attic and with the Koine that you'll regularly see ποιῶ, δηλῶ, τιμῶ rather than ποιέω, δηλόω, τιμάω. That's one reason why many of us have been voicing a preference for the present infinitive as the lexical form for verbs; the forms ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, τιμᾶν clearly indicate that these are contract verbs with stems in -ε-ειν, -ο-ειν, -α-ειν, respectively.WAnderson wrote:Thanks. Is this the case with the "lexical" form of all, most, or just some contract verbs?
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: May 6th, 2011, 1:48 pm
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
However it's done, it's helpful to make the distinction, and helps people to distinguish between shouting and becoming a cow.cwconrad wrote:As with most bold generalizations about a language, "never" is too strong a word: you will see uncontracted forms of verbs in Ionic dialect -- if you ever have occasion to read a text composed in Ionic (Herodotus and some others); it's generally the case with Attic and with the Koine that you'll regularly see ποιῶ, δηλῶ, τιμῶ rather than ποιέω, δηλόω, τιμάω. That's one reason why many of us have been voicing a preference for the present infinitive as the lexical form for verbs; the forms ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, τιμᾶν clearly indicate that these are contract verbs with stems in -ε-ειν, -ο-ειν, -α-ειν, respectively.WAnderson wrote:Thanks. Is this the case with the "lexical" form of all, most, or just some contract verbs?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
N.E. Barry Hofstetter, M.A., Th.M.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
Ph.D. Student U of FL
Instructor of Latin
Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy
καὶ σὺ τὸ σὸν ποιήσεις κἀγὼ τὸ ἐμόν. ἆρον τὸ σὸν καὶ ὕπαγε.
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
I never saw a purple cow;Barry Hofstetter wrote:However it's done, it's helpful to make the distinction, and helps people to distinguish between shouting and becoming a cow.cwconrad wrote:As with most bold generalizations about a language, "never" is too strong a word: you will see uncontracted forms of verbs in Ionic dialect -- if you ever have occasion to read a text composed in Ionic (Herodotus and some others); it's generally the case with Attic and with the Koine that you'll regularly see ποιῶ, δηλῶ, τιμῶ rather than ποιέω, δηλόω, τιμάω. That's one reason why many of us have been voicing a preference for the present infinitive as the lexical form for verbs; the forms ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, τιμᾶν clearly indicate that these are contract verbs with stems in -ε-ειν, -ο-ειν, -α-ειν, respectively.WAnderson wrote:Thanks. Is this the case with the "lexical" form of all, most, or just some contract verbs?
I never hope to see one;
but I can tell you this right now:
I'd rather shout than be one.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: May 20th, 2014, 10:13 am
- Location: west coast of Canada
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
-ε-ειν, -ο-ουν, -α-αν respectivelycwconrad wrote: ... That's one reason why many of us have been voicing a preference for the present infinitive as the lexical form for verbs; the forms ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, τιμᾶν clearly indicate that these are contract verbs with stems in -ε-ειν, -ο-ειν, -α-ειν, respectively.
γράφω μαθεῖν
-
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
I think the English idiom "she had a cow" is probably based on a mistranslation from the Greek.Barry Hofstetter wrote:However it's done, it's helpful to make the distinction, and helps people to distinguish between shouting and becoming a cow.
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: May 20th, 2014, 10:13 am
- Location: west coast of Canada
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
Or at least we all fervently hope that to be the case!Jonathan Robie wrote:I think the English idiom "she had a cow" is probably based on a mistranslation from the Greek.Barry Hofstetter wrote:However it's done, it's helpful to make the distinction, and helps people to distinguish between shouting and becoming a cow.
γράφω μαθεῖν
Re: Question about contract verbs (first principal part)
I'm not quite sure what is intended by that last line. What I intended to indicate was that contract verbs in -εῖν involve a contraction of ε + ειν, contract verbs in -οῦν involve a contraction of ο + ειν and contract verbs in -ᾶν involve a contraction of α + ειν. The infinitives are each contractions of the stem vowel ε, ο, or α with the infinitive ending -ειν.Thomas Dolhanty wrote:-ε-ειν, -ο-ουν, -α-αν respectivelycwconrad wrote: ... That's one reason why many of us have been voicing a preference for the present infinitive as the lexical form for verbs; the forms ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, τιμᾶν clearly indicate that these are contract verbs with stems in -ε-ειν, -ο-ειν, -α-ειν, respectively.
οὔτοι ἀπ’ ἀρχῆς πάντα θεοὶ θνητοῖς ὑπέδειξαν,
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)
ἀλλὰ χρόνῳ ζητέοντες ἐφευρίσκουσιν ἄμεινον. (Xenophanes, Fragment 16)
Carl W. Conrad
Department of Classics, Washington University (Retired)