In this week's Gospel, John 14: 8 - 17, there is a lot of use of the word ἐν. I wonder if I am oversimplifying by substituting the English in, or if I should investigate further how ἐν is used.
οὐ πιστεύεις ὅτι ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ πατρὶ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί ἐστιν; τὰ ῥήματα ἃ ἐγὼ λέγω ὑμῖν ἀπ' ἐμαυτοῦ οὐ λαλῶ: ὁ δὲ πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοὶ μένων ποιεῖ τὰ ἔργα αὐτοῦ. 11πιστεύετέ μοι ὅτι ἐγὼ ἐν τῷ πατρὶ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἐν ἐμοί: εἰ δὲ μή, διὰ τὰ ἔργα αὐτὰ πιστεύετε....13καὶ ὅ τι ἂν αἰτήσητε ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου τοῦτο ποιήσω, ἵνα δοξασθῇ ὁ πατὴρ ἐν τῷ υἱῷ: 14ἐάν τι αἰτήσητέ με ἐν τῷ ὀνόματί μου ἐγὼ ποιήσω.
In verses 16 and 17 - κἀγὼ ἐρωτήσω τὸν πατέρα καὶ ἄλλον παράκλητον δώσει ὑμῖν ἵνα μεθ' ὑμῶν εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα ᾖ, τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας, ὃ ὁ κόσμος οὐ δύναται λαβεῖν, ὅτι οὐ θεωρεῖ αὐτὸ οὐδὲ γινώσκει: ὑμεῖς γινώσκετε αὐτό, ὅτι παρ' ὑμῖν μένει καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται. - the παράκλητον is amoung - μεθ' ὑμῶν ᾖ, remaining around - παρ' ὑμῖν μένει , and being in - ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται us.
Is this just adding some variety to the repitition, or is there significance to the different prepositions?
ἐν, μεθ', παρ'
Forum rules
This is a beginner's forum - see the Koine Greek forum for more advanced discussion of Greek texts. Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up.
When answering questions in this forum, keep it simple, and aim your responses to the level of the person asking the question.
This is a beginner's forum - see the Koine Greek forum for more advanced discussion of Greek texts. Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up.
When answering questions in this forum, keep it simple, and aim your responses to the level of the person asking the question.
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: ἐν, μεθ', παρ'
In my opinion, this author is particularly prone to use variety as a means of reinforcing the common meaning of the various words.Allan Rumsch wrote:Is this just adding some variety to the repitition, or is there significance to the different prepositions?
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: March 14th, 2013, 7:40 am
Re: ἐν, μεθ', παρ'
ὅτι παρ' ὑμῖν μένει καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται
I personally would see a distinction in this context, not so much because of the prepositions used but because of the tenses used and the larger context of John (e.g. 7:39; 14:16 and 16:7). This context implies a change from what they currently had to what they would have with reference to the Spirit. For that reason I would see a distinction between the Spirit's ministry "with them" during Jesus's ministry and "in them" after.
I personally would see a distinction in this context, not so much because of the prepositions used but because of the tenses used and the larger context of John (e.g. 7:39; 14:16 and 16:7). This context implies a change from what they currently had to what they would have with reference to the Spirit. For that reason I would see a distinction between the Spirit's ministry "with them" during Jesus's ministry and "in them" after.
Jonathan Boyd
ABWE missionary - Colombia
ABWE missionary - Colombia
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: ἐν, μεθ', παρ'
Thanks for your good comment, though it's not clear from the spelling whether the present μένει or the future μενεῖ was meant, for the earliest manuscripts did not write the accents.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: March 14th, 2013, 7:40 am
Re: ἐν, μεθ', παρ'
κἀγὼ ἐρωτήσω τὸν πατέρα καὶ ἄλλον παράκλητον δώσει ὑμῖν ἵνα μεθ' ὑμῶν εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα ᾖ, τὸ πνεῦμα τῆς ἀληθείας, ὃ ὁ κόσμος οὐ δύναται λαβεῖν, ὅτι οὐ θεωρεῖ αὐτὸ οὐδὲ γινώσκει: ὑμεῖς γινώσκετε αὐτό, ὅτι παρ' ὑμῖν μένει καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται
Stephen, I'd thought of that possibility, and of course there's also discussion on whether ἔσται is the correct reading, but in the way I understand the text it's better to read μένει as present so that John is giving a reason for what precedes: ὑμεῖς γινώσκετε αὐτό, ὅτι παρ' ὑμῖν μένει. You know him because he dwells/resides with you. In other words, they already know something of the Spirit because he has been with them, not because he will be with them. I would then understand the second half of the sentence (καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν ἔσται) to explain v. 16 (κἀγὼ ἐρωτήσω τὸν πατέρα καὶ ἄλλον παράκλητον δώσει ὑμῖν ἵνα μεθ' ὑμῶν εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα ᾖ).Thanks for your good comment, though it's not clear from the spelling whether the present μένει or the future μενεῖ was meant, for the earliest manuscripts did not write the accents.
Jonathan Boyd
ABWE missionary - Colombia
ABWE missionary - Colombia