Are there morphologies that we should be considering?
Is this still worth converting?
A philological introduction to Greek and Latin for students (1883)
Author: Baur, Ferdinand Christian, 1792-1860; Paul, C. Kegan (Charles Kegan), 1828-1902
https://archive.org/details/philologicalintr00baurrich
I assume that the German is less accessible for most people ... if you had to pick between the German original and a translation, which way would you go, and why?
Morphologies?
-
- Posts: 4172
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Morphologies?
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 883
- Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
- Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Morphologies?
It's worth converting, and the English is preferable in this case.Jonathan Robie wrote:Is this still worth converting?
A philological introduction to Greek and Latin for students (1883)
Author: Baur, Ferdinand Christian, 1792-1860; Paul, C. Kegan (Charles Kegan), 1828-1902
https://archive.org/details/philologicalintr00baurrich
I assume that the German is less accessible for most people ... if you had to pick between the German original and a translation, which way would you go, and why?
Ken M. Penner
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Morphologies?
I'm afraid this work is quite out-of-date. For example, it claims that the aorist sigma ending comes from the verb to be (e.g. ἐσ- τί), which no one has believed for a very long time.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 4172
- Joined: May 5th, 2011, 5:34 pm
- Location: Durham, NC
- Contact:
Re: Morphologies?
Are there any morphologies that are more or less current, but old enough to be out of copyright (before 1923, or author died at least 70 years ago?)
ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
http://jonathanrobie.biblicalhumanities.org/
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Morphologies?
For morphology, I get by using Smyth. If one is interested in the Koine period morphology, no reference will be up-to-date unless it takes into account the papyri that was published throughout the 20th century. So ideally one would want Gignac or maybe Mussies. But yeah, the copyright cut-off is rather unfortunate for us.
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia