ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Forum rules
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
Mitch Tulloch
Posts: 59
Joined: November 4th, 2017, 2:52 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Contact:

ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Mitch Tulloch »

παραγενόμενος δὲ τῶν ἀνασωθέντων τις ἀπήγγειλεν Αβραμ τῷ περάτῃ αὐτὸς δὲ κατῴκει πρὸς τῇ δρυὶ τῇ Μαμβρη ὁ Αμορις τοῦ ἀδελφοῦ Εσχωλ καὶ ἀδελφοῦ Αυναν οἳ ἦσαν συνωμόται τοῦ Αβραμ

Although the NETS LXX translates this mechanically as "...Now he, Amoris, used to live near the oak of Mambre, the brother of Eschol and..." it seems obvious to me that the αὐτὸς refers to Abram and that Αμορις is simply an (unattested elsewhere) Greek spelling for Amorite. But does the Greek phrase πρὸς τῇ δρυὶ τῇ Μαμβρη ὁ Αμορις make any sense grammatically? Wouldn't πρὸς τῇ δρυὶ του Μαμβρη του Αμορις have been the proper way to phrase this? And is it ever OK grammatically to keep the Nominative ὁ in a (compound) name like Μαμβρη ὁ Αμορις regardless of what the declension is of the article that preceeds the name?
Cheers,
Mitch Tulloch
Mitch Tulloch
Posts: 59
Joined: November 4th, 2017, 2:52 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Mitch Tulloch »

Sorry I meant "case" of the article not "declension".
Cheers,
Mitch Tulloch
Ken M. Penner
Posts: 881
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Ken M. Penner »

Here's Wevers' comment on this.
Wevers 194 2023-12-17 150124.png
Wevers 194 2023-12-17 150124.png (361.71 KiB) Viewed 13041 times
Ken M. Penner
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Co-Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
Ken M. Penner
Posts: 881
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Ken M. Penner »

Brayford depends on Wevers.
Brayford 295 2023-12-17 185935.png
Brayford 295 2023-12-17 185935.png (98.54 KiB) Viewed 12939 times
Ken M. Penner
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Co-Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
Ken M. Penner
Posts: 881
Joined: May 12th, 2011, 7:50 am
Location: Antigonish, NS, Canada
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Ken M. Penner »

FWIW, John Chrysostom reads the genitive case here, in Homilies on Genesis 35.12.
Ken M. Penner
Professor and Chair of Religious Studies, St. Francis Xavier University
Co-Editor, Digital Biblical Studies
General Editor, Lexham English Septuagint
Co-Editor, Online Critical Pseudepigrapha pseudepigrapha.org
Mitch Tulloch
Posts: 59
Joined: November 4th, 2017, 2:52 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Mitch Tulloch »

Fascinating. So Chrysostom says Μαμβρη was Abram's neighbor (ὅμορος)? It seems like Chrysostom must have read ὁ Αμορις and thought, No that can't be right, and found a more logical (and similar-sounding) Greek word to replace it. Was Chrysostom translating from the Hebrew in his commentary, or was he using (and paraphrazing or correcting) the LXX (or some LXX alternative)? Because of the φημὶ etc.

Also, what Wevers says about ὁ Αμορις being a "phrase which is anomalously here in the nominative as a frozen phrase" just sounds like a cop-out to me. Better to say that the LXX translator simply goofed here ;)

But it still leaves the question in my mind whether grammatical constructions like "τῇ (or the article in G, D or A but *not* N) Bob ὁ Canuck" exist anywhere else in the early Greek corpus.

And why τῇ Μαμβρη instead of τῷ Μαμβρη? Aren't names of males always masculine case?
Cheers,
Mitch Tulloch
wwzeitler
Posts: 1
Joined: June 17th, 2016, 10:29 am

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by wwzeitler »

Here's Wevers' comment on this
i know who Wever is, but I'm not figuring out the reference.

Thanks!!
William Zeitler
Jean Putmans
Posts: 153
Joined: August 3rd, 2018, 1:01 am
Location: Heerlen; Netherlands
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Jean Putmans »

It’s not necessary that Chryststom himself changed to ομορος, possibly he had a manuscript with that reading:

https://archive.org/details/oldtestamen ... ew=theater
Jean Putmans
Netherlands
gotischebibel.blogspot.com
Devenios Doulenios
Posts: 230
Joined: May 31st, 2011, 5:11 pm
Location: Carlisle, Arkansas, USA
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by Devenios Doulenios »

Jean, the work you linked to on archive.org looks very useful for textual criticism. What is the title?
Dewayne Dulaney
Δεβένιος Δουλένιος

Blog: https://letancientvoicesspeak.wordpress.com/

"Ὁδοὶ δύο εἰσί, μία τῆς ζωῆς καὶ μία τοῦ θανάτου."--Διδαχή Α, α'
James Spinti
Posts: 103
Joined: June 1st, 2011, 6:01 pm
Location: Red Wing MN
Contact:

Re: ὁ Αμορις in Gen 14:13

Post by James Spinti »

The Old Testament in Greek: According to the text of Codex Vaticanus, supplemented from other uncial manuscripts, with a critical apparatus containing the variants of the chief ancient authorities for the text of the Septuagint. Volume 1, The Octateuch.

You can find the title by scrolling all the way to the top of the file linked to. I believe that Cambridge University Press brought these back out in paperback about 10 years ago. Quite useful. But, because they are old (1917!), they are in the public domain. You can download them from Internet Archive. If you click on the three dots to the left side, you will get a download option for that one.

HTH,
James
Proofreading and copyediting of ancient Near Eastern and biblical studies monographs
Post Reply

Return to “Septuagint and Pseudepigrapha”