ἔγειρε semantics and orthography--how would you parse this?

[S Walch]

προσενεγκε: At least 28 Mss have πρσοενεγκαι (04, 019, 038, 064, 0211, 18, 35, 176, 517, 569, 579, 719, 1840, 979, 1029, 1071, 1084, 1216, 1273, 1424, 1495, 1582, 1689, 2174, 2206, 2542, L387; and (not listed in the ECM:) 94, 1354

In some Mss. the original text has πρσοενεγκε, which was corrected to προσενεγκαι (427, 807, 872, 1654).

This is interesting. In the Mark passages looked at in my post, C (04), Θ (038), 176., 427., 1216., 1273., 1582., and 2174. had consistent ἐγειρε. Most of the others listed here had consistent ἔγειραι, so not surprised they had προσένεγκαι here.

What I forgot to note in my post was minuscules 1582 and 2193 all had their ἔγειρε corrected to ἔγειραι by a later corrector. 872 also had its ἔγειρε corrected to ἔγειραι in Mark 2:9, 11, 3:3, 5:41, yet had ἔγειραι corrected to ἔγειρε in Mark 10:49. Evidently even correctors weren't unaffected by an ε/αι confusion.

[Jason Hare]

Could Mk 1:44 bei "the other way around", Medium Imperative with active meaning ?

Just in passive, do you mean "middle" when you say "medium"?

[Jean Putmans]

Yes, medium => middle (I am, being a dutch germanist, used to "medium").

Why just "passive"? Shouldn't it be middle-passive MP, like Katabiblon does? Montanari splits the two in his φερω-lemma.

[Stephen Carlson]

Why just "passive"?

Looks like it’s a typo or word-play for “Just in passing” to me.