ἦν δ̓ ἡ λάρναξ τούς τε τοίχους καρτερὰ καὶ τὸν ὄροφον, ὡς μηδαμόθεν ἐπικλύζεσθαι μηδ̓ ἡττᾶσθαι τῆς τοῦ ὕδατος βίας
I am puzzled as to how the two accusative fit in here, I can’t see a verb that they could be governed by unless I am somehow to take them as the subjects of the infinitive in the next clause, which doesn’t seem right.
Any ideas?
Antiquities 1:78
Forum rules
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
Please quote the Greek text you are discussing directly in your post if it is reasonably short - do not ask people to look it up. This is not a beginner's forum, competence in Greek is assumed.
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
Could it be an accusative of respect, "the ark, with respect to the walls and roof"?
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
Yes, but construed with the adjective καρτερά ("strong in its walls and roof").Matthew Longhorn wrote: ↑November 10th, 2020, 3:42 pm Could it be an accusative of respect, "the ark, with respect to the walls and roof"?
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
Thanks
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
I don't have access to some of my grammars, I was wondering why someone may use an accusative of respect rather than a dative of respect.
I see that there was a shift towards the dative during the koine period, is there any kind of difference in meaning between the two constructions?
I see that there was a shift towards the dative during the koine period, is there any kind of difference in meaning between the two constructions?
-
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: May 11th, 2011, 10:51 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
There's a certain division of labor. The accusative of respect is most seen with body parts or things that are analogous to body parts. There are some others; consult Smyth for more details.Matthew Longhorn wrote: ↑November 11th, 2020, 10:54 am I don't have access to some of my grammars, I was wondering why someone may use an accusative of respect rather than a dative of respect.
I see that there was a shift towards the dative during the koine period, is there any kind of difference in meaning between the two constructions?
Stephen C. Carlson, Ph.D.
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: November 10th, 2017, 2:48 pm
- Contact:
Re: Antiquities 1:78
Thanks, when I next have access to Smyth I will give it a read
Re: Antiquities 1:78
It's online at PerseusMatthew Longhorn wrote: ↑November 13th, 2020, 3:56 am Thanks, when I next have access to Smyth I will give it a read
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... 99.04.0007
Accusative of Respect:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... ction%3D91