[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: all theory thread
Thanks Myk,
You have crystalised a thought that has been forming for sometime and
particularly amidst the chaos of this rich theory thread.
Perhaps the philosophy of Permaculture needs to be treated more as a
"social" issue, whereas the science/theory and in practice variations need
to be treated organically.
Sometimes putting too much into one string muddies the logic.
Or am I just being muddle headed???
Any thoughts???
Best wishes to you all.
Robert Jensen
>From: "Myk Rushton" <permaculture@wave.co.nz>
>Reply-To: "permaculture" <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
>To: "permaculture" <permaculture@franklin.oit.unc.edu>
>Subject: Re: all theory thread
>Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:05:09 +1200
>
>Greetings
>
>David Holmgren Wrote:
>
> > Perhaps inevitably working on the principles has led me into
> > a further reorganization and clarification of my
> > own understandings.
>
>How do we define what a permaculture principle actually is or does? As
>opposed to, as Toby says, rules of thumb, guidlelines, design tools or
>physical and biological laws.
>
>Myk
>--
>
>
>
>
>---
>You are currently subscribed to permaculture as: robertscroft@hotmail.com
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>$subst('Email.Unsub')
>To subscribe send email to lyris@franklin.oit.unc.edu
>with message text containing: subscribe permaculture
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com