From: Michael Neylon (mneylon@engin.umich.edu)
Date: 3-Apr-95 (12:5:15 GMT)
Subj: More Msg 9
Ok, this is the strangest (and most puzzling) message yet.
Here is a quick intepretation of the symbols...
'9' is a honeycomb-like structure
2 '9's are a part of a TCian.
[is '9' a body part? Eyes? Brain? Genders?]
Block Arguement...
Time 0 [Big Bang? Genesis?]
'3' '-m-' (TCEarth or infinity)
Nothing is part of TCEarth
'3' '-$-'
'3' and '-$-' is water or '3' [*]
'3' '-*-' (TCEarth or water)
'x'
End block
[*] This line could also be ('3' and Water) || ('3' and '-$-'),
but we've never seen H in a non-triple use.
To me, the last block is definitely thoughts about
the beginnings of time and the universe. We begin with
t=0, the ultimate beginning, and end with a simple statement
of 'light' ('x' = bright/hot or could be taken as 'light')
'3' seems to be some concept of either God or the whole
of existance. '-m-' seems to be 'existing' or 'created'
(definitely a verb of some form). However, this use
sorta conflicts with its 'definition' in Message 8..
G-m-PGQAQHXHXGP-m-G (or '-m-' is "0+x=x")
where -m- seems to be 'everything'. Although...thinking
back to how '-H-' and '-P-' was used, then this usage for
'-m-' might be to imply truth (0+x=x is true), and truth
implies existance. Hmmm. Of course, existance is
a part of the whole of existance (-m-^3^-m-)
Also, why water? It *is* interesting that they write it
as HOH, which fits confortably into their language, so
maybe they think of water as a basis for life ('Water of Life'
for example). So in this case, maybe 'water' isn't the
actual thing, but a spritial term implying ...err. the
breath of life? I dunno.
Anyway, to restate that last part, IMO...
At time 0,
TCEarth or infinity existed in the whole of existance
Nothing was a part of TCEarth
The whole of existance "moved"(?)
The whole of existance and "moving" made "Water of life"
or the whole of existance
The whole of existance '-*-' TCEarth or the "Water of life"
Light.
Weird...very weird.
Back
Forward
Index