[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DocBook Guidelines

To: markk@cgipc.com, Mark Komarinski <markk@cgipc.com>, Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>
Subject: Re: DocBook Guidelines
From: David Merrill <dcmerrill@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 21:26:49 -0400
Cc: ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
In-reply-to: <393FBA80.DD577FEF@cgipc.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006080659030.21308-100000@crazypenguins.commandprompt.com> <393FBA80.DD577FEF@cgipc.com>
Resent-date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 21:32:42 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <Ow1WGB.A.mFB.9kEQ5@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

On Thu, 08 Jun 2000, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > 
> Uhm...H-H says we accept GIF, but acknowledge patent disputes.
> And .EPS won't show up in web or htmldoc versions:
> 
> For images use [JPG or GIF] and EPS
> 
> > 3. No short tags. No exceptions.
> > 4. No deprecated tags.
> 
> Sounds fair.  How depreciated do we want to go?  <graphic> isn't being taken
> out until 5.0, and 4.0 is barely off and running, but there are better reasons
> than depreciation to use <mediaobject>.

Wouldn't the project, and DocBook in general, be best served by supporting the
most current recommended usage of the language? Especially for new submissions?

-- 
David Merrill
dcmerrill@mindspring.com


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DocBook Guidelines
  - From: Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>
- Re: DocBook Guidelines
  - From: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl

References:
- DocBook Guidelines
  - From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>
- Re: DocBook Guidelines
  - From: Mark Komarinski <markk@cgipc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Authorship
Next by Date: RE: More HOWTO-HOWTO Recommendations
Previous by thread: Re: DocBook Guidelines
Next by thread: Re: DocBook Guidelines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread