This is way out of my league both in treeing, computing and linguistics, but to answer it in another way, I'm still forming my ideas about beauty and balance in sentences structures, but wouldn't what you are trying to represent be the same way that you would represent other balances in the way that the language is expressed? Have a look at some of them...
John 17:10 wrote:καὶ τὰ ἐμὰ πάντα σά ἐστιν, καὶ τὰ σὰ ἐμά·
1-3*2(>4) + 1-3[*2(>4)] (first element balanced with the third on the second leading onto the fourth.
The balancing element (in the centre), the πάντα is not spelt out in the second part of the expression, but because it has the things that need it to balance on, it is sort of expected there,
Hebrews 8:1 wrote:τοιοῦτον ἔχομεν ἀρχιερέα
1-3*2>the relative clause (as 4th).
Hebrews 8:1 wrote:ὃς ἐκάθισεν ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ θρόνου τῆς μεγαλωσύνης ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς,
If the ὃς is read with a pause after it, 1-5*(2-4*3). The ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ θρόνου τῆς μεγαλωσύνης has the balance around the τοῦ θρόνου, and the ἐκάθισεν and the ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς are balanced around ἐν δεξιᾷ τοῦ θρόνου τῆς μεγαλωσύνης phrase as a whole.
For this type of noun phrases that you are looking at the balances are similar.
Luke 1:8 wrote:ἐν τῇ τάξει τῆς ἐφημερίας αὐτοῦ
ἐν+1-(3-5*4)*2 (τῇ balanced with the phrase τῆς ἐφημερίας αὐτοῦ (which itself consists of the balance of τῆς and αὐτοῦ on ἐφημερίας) on the word τάξει).