[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Yorker Pile-on
This is more than a thread, it's a veritable cable!
As a professional formerly in the museum field (collections and exhibitry) I
have to echo that certain objects must be carefully examined, valued and
weighted for long-term preservation -- especially as exhibitable artifacts.
Even newspapers. Specimen samples, of course.
Although newspapers (and other commercial periodicals) are abundant beyond
belief, well-preserved examples will have a great deal more value two to
three generations-plus from now -- if only for the technology(ies) they
represent.
Kevin (I still can't hold MF or Video up to a candle to read by night)
Bunker
Student Assistant
California State Archives
> ----------
> From: Michael Knies[SMTP:kniesm2@uofs.edu]
> Reply To: Archives & Archivists
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 12:18 PM
> To: ARCHIVES@LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU
> Subject: Re: New Yorker
>
> As an archivist who has recently become very involved in rare book
> studies, I have become very sensitive to the physical aspects of
> documents. There has been a bias toward intellectual history in this
> discussion in the sense that content matters much more than the physical
> properties of the document. But the physical properties of a book or a
> newspaper, particularly one produced before approximately 1800, provide
> substantial information concerning labor history (printing shop practice),
> business history (how the printing trade in general operated), etc.
> For instance, a single book printed in Germany might contain paper made in
> Switzerland, Italy, and France (identifiable by watermarks). This tells
> the book historian information about the economic organization of the
> paper and book industries, as well as information about how a printing
> shop used its materials. Not all of this information can be reproduced by
> microfilm or digitization. If the artifact is discarded this information
> is lost.
>
> Content is completely irrelevant to these lines of inquiry. To paraphrase
> one historian of printing, the only thing we do not do with a book is read
> it.
>
> I will, of course, state the obvious and say that we cannot save
> everything. But representative examples of everything should be saved or
> else where we are choosing to only save intellectual history and throw
> away material history.
>
> Michael Knies
> Special Collections Librarian
> University of Scranton
>
> A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List!
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to listserv@listserv.muohio.edu
> In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
> *or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
> To post a message, send e-mail to archives@listserv.muohio.edu
>
> Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
> http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
>
> Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <rschmidt@lib.muohio.edu>
>
A posting from the Archives & Archivists LISTSERV List!
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send e-mail to listserv@listserv.muohio.edu
In body of message: SUB ARCHIVES firstname lastname
*or*: UNSUB ARCHIVES
To post a message, send e-mail to archives@listserv.muohio.edu
Or to do *anything* (and enjoy doing it!), use the web interface at
http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html
Problems? Send e-mail to Robert F Schmidt <rschmidt@lib.muohio.edu>