From: Joe A. Friberg (JoeFriberg@email.msn.com)
Date: Fri Oct 08 1999 - 17:57:25 EDT
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Mullins <mullik@CHAMPINT.COM>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 10:49 AM
>
> I don't understand why EKLIPHi is singular here. Is it used as an
impersonal
> verb?
>
> Lk 16:9 KAI EGW hUMIN LEGW, hEAUTOIS POIHSATE FILOUS EK TOU MAMWNA THS
ADIKIAS,
> hINA hOTAN EKLIPHi DEXWNTAI hUMAS EIS TAS AIWNIOUS SKHNAS.
>
The 3sg. subject of EKLIPHi is coreferrential with TOU MAMWNA which is m.sg.
That is, it is the "mammon" (sg.) that will fail you (pl.). Mammon has a
generic reference, as to a general principle.
Joe Friberg
--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:41 EDT