Re: gennawing males

From: Daniel L Christiansen (dlc@multnomah.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 02 1999 - 00:47:03 EST


Jim West wrote [snipped]:

> I realize "fathered" is problematic for us. But for both the Israelites of
> the Psalm and the Christians of Clement's day, it would have held no
> problems at all.

    And, of course, this is exactly the question at hand . . . Neither the
Christians of Clement's day, nor the Israelites in the day of the Psalmist would
have had any comprehension of "fathered," since it is a term in a language which did
not yet exist. But, would they have had a problem with a term which denotes a male
parent being "gerunded" as a verb which may denote either/neither gender of
ancestor? Certainly, GENNAW is used without respect to gender; I suppose I am still
uncertain as to whether we can keep that ambiguity in an English verb, and also hold
onto the personal/familial connotations present in GENNAW.

--
Daniel L. Christiansen
Department of Bible
Multnomah Bible College
8435 NE Glisan Street
Portland, OR  97220
(Also Portland Bible College, Prof of Biblical Languages)
e-mail: dlc@multnomah.edu

--- B-Greek home page: http://sunsite.unc.edu/bgreek You are currently subscribed to b-greek as: [cwconrad@artsci.wustl.edu] To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-greek-329W@franklin.oit.unc.edu To subscribe, send a message to subscribe-b-greek@franklin.oit.unc.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:40:47 EDT